Suppr超能文献

基于《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》框架的关节炎和肌肉骨骼疾病患者劳动生产力问卷内容比较。

Content comparison of worker productivity questionnaires in arthritis and musculoskeletal conditions using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health framework.

机构信息

ICF Research Branch of the World Health Organization-Collaborating Center, Family of International Classifications, Swiss Paraplegic Research, Guido A. Zach Strasse 4, 6207 Nottwil, Switzerland.

出版信息

J Occup Rehabil. 2009 Dec;19(4):382-97. doi: 10.1007/s10926-009-9193-0. Epub 2009 Jul 26.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Worker productivity outcome is essential in examining the rehabilitation of workers with arthritis and other musculoskeletal conditions. There is great variation in the contents of worker productivity questionnaires. The International Classification of Functioning Disability and Health (ICF) offers the possibility to serve as a reference to describe and compare the contents of these questionnaires.

METHODS

A literature review identified published self-report worker productivity questionnaires. All meaningful concepts were identified and linked to the corresponding ICF category according to established rules.

RESULTS

Eighteen questionnaires were identified which contained a total of 519 meaningful concepts and which were linked to 64 unique 2nd level ICF categories. All questionnaires addressed Activities and Participation, thirteen (72%) addressed Body Functions, seven (39%) addressed Environmental Factors, seven (39%) addressed Personal Factors and only one questionnaire (6%) for Body Structures component. Overall, Work Role Functioning (WRF) questionnaire addressed the most number of different categories while Quantity and Quality method contained only one ICF category. The Rheumatoid Arthritis-Work Instability Scale had the highest number of categories for Body Functions, the Work Activity Limitations Scale and WRF had the most number of categories for Activities and Participation. The Health and Labour Questionnaire had the highest number of categories referring to unpaid work participation. The Health and Work Questionnaire was the only that included contextualization of both Environmental and Personal Factors.

CONCLUSION

Self-report worker productivity questionnaires differed largely in their contents. This content analysis study could guide us in selecting an appropriate questionnaire for a specific study question.

摘要

背景

工人的生产力结果是评估关节炎和其他肌肉骨骼疾病患者康复情况的关键。工人生产力问卷的内容存在很大差异。国际功能、残疾和健康分类(ICF)提供了一种可能性,可以用来描述和比较这些问卷的内容。

方法

文献综述确定了已发表的自我报告工人生产力问卷。根据既定规则,识别所有有意义的概念,并将其链接到相应的 ICF 类别。

结果

确定了 18 份问卷,其中包含 519 个有意义的概念,这些概念与 64 个独特的二级 ICF 类别相关联。所有问卷都涉及活动和参与,13 份(72%)涉及身体功能,7 份(39%)涉及环境因素,7 份(39%)涉及个人因素,只有一份问卷(6%)涉及身体结构部分。总体而言,工作角色功能(WRF)问卷涵盖了最多的不同类别,而数量和质量方法仅包含一个 ICF 类别。类风湿关节炎-工作不稳定量表在身体功能方面涵盖了最多的类别,工作活动限制量表和 WRF 在活动和参与方面涵盖了最多的类别。健康和劳动问卷在提及非有偿工作参与方面涵盖了最多的类别。健康和工作问卷是唯一同时包含环境和个人因素背景化的问卷。

结论

自我报告的工人生产力问卷在内容上存在很大差异。这项内容分析研究可以帮助我们为特定的研究问题选择合适的问卷。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验