Catania Francesco, Gao Xiang, Scofield Douglas G
Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA.
J Hered. 2009 Sep-Oct;100(5):591-6. doi: 10.1093/jhered/esp062. Epub 2009 Jul 27.
Over 30 years since their discovery, the origin of spliceosomal introns remains uncertain. One nearly universally accepted hypothesis maintains that spliceosomal introns originated from self-splicing group-II introns that invaded the uninterrupted genes of the last eukaryotic common ancestor (LECA) and proliferated by "insertion" events. Although this is a possible explanation for the original presence of introns and splicing machinery, the emphasis on a high number of insertion events in the genome of the LECA neglects a considerable body of empirical evidence showing that spliceosomal introns can simply arise from coding or, more generally, nonintronic sequences within genes. After presenting a concise overview of some of the most common hypotheses and mechanisms for intron origin, we propose two further hypotheses that are broadly based on central cellular processes: 1) internal gene duplication and 2) the response to aberrant and fortuitously spliced transcripts. These two nonmutually exclusive hypotheses provide a powerful way to explain the establishment of spliceosomal introns in eukaryotes without invoking an exogenous source.
自剪接体内含子被发现以来的30多年里,其起源仍然不确定。一个几乎被普遍接受的假说是,剪接体内含子起源于自我剪接的II类内含子,这些内含子侵入了最后一个真核生物共同祖先(LECA)的不间断基因,并通过“插入”事件增殖。尽管这可能是内含子和剪接机制最初存在的一种解释,但强调LECA基因组中大量的插入事件忽略了大量的经验证据,这些证据表明剪接体内含子可以简单地从基因内的编码序列或更一般的非内含子序列中产生。在简要概述了一些最常见的内含子起源假说和机制之后,我们提出了另外两个广泛基于细胞核心过程的假说:1)基因内部复制和2)对异常和偶然剪接的转录本的反应。这两个并非相互排斥的假说提供了一种有力的方式来解释真核生物中剪接体内含子的建立,而无需引入外源。