Unité 678, Inserm/UPMC, 91 boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75634 Paris Cedex 13, France.
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2010 Feb;152(2):185-93. doi: 10.1007/s00701-009-0469-0. Epub 2009 Jul 29.
While the fundamental and clinical contribution of direct electrical stimulation (DES) of the brain is now well acknowledged, its advantages and limitations have not been re-evaluated for a long time.
Here, we critically review exactly what DES can tell us about cerebral function.
First, we show that DES is highly sensitive for detecting the cortical and axonal eloquent structures. Moreover, DES also provides a unique opportunity to study brain connectivity, since each area responsive to stimulation is in fact an input gate into a large-scale network rather than an isolated discrete functional site. DES, however, also has a limitation: its specificity is suboptimal. Indeed, DES may lead to interpretations that a structure is crucial because of the induction of a transient functional response when stimulated, whereas (1) this effect is caused by the backward spreading of the electro-stimulation along the network to an essential area and/or (2) the stimulated region can be functionally compensated owing to long-term brain plasticity mechanisms.
In brief, although DES is still the gold standard for brain mapping, its combination with new methods such as perioperative neurofunctional imaging and biomathematical modeling is now mandatory, in order to clearly differentiate those networks that are actually indispensable to function from those that can be compensated.
尽管大脑的直接电刺激(DES)的基础和临床贡献现在已得到广泛认可,但很长时间以来,其优势和局限性都没有得到重新评估。
在这里,我们批判性地回顾了 DES 能告诉我们关于大脑功能的哪些信息。
首先,我们表明 DES 对检测皮质和轴突的功能结构非常敏感。此外,DES 还为研究大脑连接性提供了一个独特的机会,因为每个对刺激有反应的区域实际上是一个大型网络的输入门,而不是一个孤立的离散功能部位。然而,DES 也有一个局限性:其特异性不理想。事实上,DES 可能导致一种解释,即由于刺激时诱导的短暂功能反应,一个结构是至关重要的,而(1)这种效应是由电刺激沿着网络向后传播到一个关键区域引起的,和/或(2)由于长期的大脑可塑性机制,刺激区域可以在功能上得到补偿。
简而言之,尽管 DES 仍然是大脑映射的金标准,但现在必须将其与围手术期神经功能成像和生物数学建模等新方法结合使用,以便从那些实际上对功能不可或缺的网络和那些可以补偿的网络中清楚地区分出来。