• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

见木又见林:定性研究报告

Revealing the wood and the trees: reporting qualitative research.

作者信息

Blignault Ilse, Ritchie Jan

机构信息

University of New South Wales, Sydney.

出版信息

Health Promot J Austr. 2009 Aug;20(2):140-5. doi: 10.1071/he09140.

DOI:10.1071/he09140
PMID:19642963
Abstract

Qualitative research methodologies, which are oriented to better understanding of the context, meaning and experiences of people's lives, have much to contribute to health promotion. For researchers trained in quantitative methods, writing up qualitative research for a peer-reviewed journal can be a challenge, especially keeping within the prescribed word limits. How well you explain and disseminate your research will influence how others evaluate its quality; this has implications not only for what you write and the terminology you use but for how you structure your article. This paper provides a general guide to presenting qualitative research for publication in a way that has meaning for authors and readers, is acceptable to editors and reviewers, and meets criteria for high standards of qualitative research reporting across the board. We discuss the writing of all sections of an article, placing particular emphasis on how you might best present your findings, illustrating our points with examples drawn from previous issues of this Journal. Overall, we emphasise that reporting qualitative research involves sharing both the process and the findings, that is, revealing both the wood and the trees.

摘要

定性研究方法旨在更好地理解人们生活的背景、意义和经历,对健康促进有很大贡献。对于接受过定量方法培训的研究人员来说,为同行评审期刊撰写定性研究报告可能是一项挑战,尤其是要在规定的字数限制内完成。你对研究的解释和传播效果将影响他人对其质量的评估;这不仅对你所写的内容、使用的术语有影响,对你文章的结构也有影响。本文提供了一个总体指南,介绍如何以一种对作者和读者都有意义、能被编辑和审稿人接受且符合定性研究高标准报告标准的方式来呈现定性研究以使其得以发表。我们讨论文章各部分的撰写,特别强调如何最好地呈现你的研究结果,并通过从本期刊以前各期选取的例子来说明我们的观点。总体而言,我们强调报告定性研究涉及分享过程和结果,也就是说,既要见森林也要见树木。

相似文献

1
Revealing the wood and the trees: reporting qualitative research.见木又见林:定性研究报告
Health Promot J Austr. 2009 Aug;20(2):140-5. doi: 10.1071/he09140.
2
Journal article reporting standards for qualitative primary, qualitative meta-analytic, and mixed methods research in psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board task force report.心理学中定性原始研究、定性元分析研究和混合方法研究的期刊文章报告标准:APA 出版和传播委员会工作组报告。
Am Psychol. 2018 Jan;73(1):26-46. doi: 10.1037/amp0000151.
3
Sharing Your Practice Expertise: Writing Clinical Manuscripts for Publication.分享你的实践专长:撰写用于发表的临床稿件。
Adv Neonatal Care. 2015 Aug;15(4):229-32. doi: 10.1097/ANC.0000000000000214.
4
Writing tips for authors.作者写作小贴士。
Insight. 1998 Mar;23(1):24-7. doi: 10.1016/s1060-135x(98)90006-9.
5
Writing for academia: getting your research into print: AMEE Guide No. 74.学术写作:将你的研究成果发表:AMEE 指南第 74 号。
Med Teach. 2013;35(2):e926-34. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.742494. Epub 2012 Dec 11.
6
Writing for publication: ensuring you find the right audience for your paper.撰写发表文章:确保您为论文找到合适的受众。
Health Info Libr J. 2010 Dec;27(4):259-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2010.00918.x.
7
Writing for publication--a guide for new authors.撰写论文发表指南——给新手作者的指引
Int J Qual Health Care. 2001 Oct;13(5):417-21. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/13.5.417.
8
So you want to do research? 6: Reporting research.那么你想做研究?6:研究报告。
Br J Community Nurs. 2004 Jan;9(1):37-41. doi: 10.12968/bjcn.2004.9.1.11935.
9
Developing the "write" skills for publishing.培养发表文章的“写作”技巧。
Nutr Clin Pract. 2013 Apr;28(2):153-7. doi: 10.1177/0884533613480526. Epub 2013 Mar 1.
10
See your ideas in print: write for a professional journal.让你的想法付梓出版:为专业期刊撰稿。
Health Care Manag (Frederick). 2010 Jul-Sep;29(3):279-89. doi: 10.1097/HCM.0b013e3181da963f.

引用本文的文献

1
A Cross-Organisational Collaboration to Promote Healthy Eating and Active Living in Children: A Critical Reflection.促进儿童健康饮食与积极生活方式的跨组织合作:批判性反思
Health Promot J Austr. 2025 Jul;36(3):e70063. doi: 10.1002/hpja.70063.
2
Comprehensive Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (CCQR): Reporting Guideline for Global Health Qualitative Research Methods.全面报告定性研究的标准 (CCQR):全球健康定性研究方法报告指南。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Jul 30;21(8):1005. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21081005.
3
Feasibility, acceptability and potential efficacy of a virtual physical activity program in primary and secondary schools in New South Wales, Australia: A quasi-experimental study.
澳大利亚新南威尔士州中小学虚拟体育活动项目的可行性、可接受性和潜在效果:一项准实验研究。
Health Promot J Austr. 2023 Feb;34(1):70-84. doi: 10.1002/hpja.662. Epub 2022 Sep 23.
4
When open data closes the door: A critical examination of the past, present and the potential future for open data guidelines in journals.当开放数据关上大门:对期刊开放数据指南的过去、现在和潜在未来的批判性审视。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2023 Oct;62(4):1635-1653. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12576. Epub 2022 Sep 8.
5
Community health workers in Lesotho: Experiences of health promotion activities.莱索托的社区卫生工作者:健康促进活动的经验
Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2018 Feb 27;10(1):e1-e8. doi: 10.4102/phcfm.v10i1.1558.
6
Preliminary Checklist for Reporting Observational Studies in Sports Areas: Content Validity.体育领域观察性研究报告的初步清单:内容效度
Front Psychol. 2018 Mar 8;9:291. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00291. eCollection 2018.
7
Development and appraisal of a hand hygiene teaching approach for medical students: a qualitative study.医学生手部卫生教学方法的开发与评估:一项定性研究。
J Infect Prev. 2016 Jul;17(4):162-168. doi: 10.1177/1757177416645345. Epub 2016 May 6.
8
Evaluation of the enhanced meningitis surveillance system, Yendi municipality, northern Ghana, 2010-2015.2010 - 2015年加纳北部延迪市强化脑膜炎监测系统评估
BMC Infect Dis. 2017 Apr 24;17(1):306. doi: 10.1186/s12879-017-2410-0.
9
The Development of a Checklist to Enhance Methodological Quality in Intervention Programs.用于提高干预项目方法学质量的检查表的制定
Front Psychol. 2016 Nov 18;7:1811. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01811. eCollection 2016.
10
Quality end-of-life care for dementia: What have family carers told us so far? A narrative synthesis.痴呆症患者的优质临终关怀:到目前为止,家庭护理人员告诉了我们什么?一项叙述性综述。
Palliat Med. 2014 Jul;28(7):919-930. doi: 10.1177/0269216314526766. Epub 2014 Mar 13.