• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

元准确性差异的证据:人们了解自己给他人留下的不同印象。

Evidence of differential meta-accuracy: people understand the different impressions they make.

作者信息

Carlson Erika N, Furr R Michael

机构信息

Washington University, Department of Psychology, Campus Box 1125, St. Louis, MO 63130-4899, USA.

出版信息

Psychol Sci. 2009 Aug;20(8):1033-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02409.x. Epub 2009 Jul 23.

DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02409.x
PMID:19645692
Abstract

This article reexamines the prevailing conclusion that people are unaware of the different impressions they make, or that their differential meta-accuracy is poor. This conclusion emerged from research employing contextually undifferentiated designs that may have constrained differences in actual impressions, thereby limiting participants' ability to demonstrate differential meta-accuracy. We argue that an alternative, contextually differentiated approach may reveal evidence for differential meta-accuracy because (a) people tend to behave differently in different social contexts, (b) interaction partners from different social contexts witness differing behaviors and form differing impressions of a target person, and (c) contextual information used to infer the impression one makes on others is relatively differentiated across contexts, resulting in differentiated metaperceptions. We assessed differential meta-accuracy across social contexts (i.e., parents, hometown friends, and college friends) and found that, in contrast to researchers' prevailing conclusion, people can indeed detect the relative impressions they make on others.

摘要

本文重新审视了一个普遍的结论,即人们没有意识到自己给他人留下的不同印象,或者他们的元准确性差异很差。这个结论源于采用情境无差异设计的研究,这种设计可能限制了实际印象的差异,从而限制了参与者展示元准确性差异的能力。我们认为,一种情境有差异的替代方法可能会揭示元准确性差异的证据,因为:(a)人们在不同的社会情境中往往表现不同;(b)来自不同社会情境的互动伙伴见证了不同的行为,并对目标人物形成了不同的印象;(c)用于推断自己给他人留下的印象的情境信息在不同情境中相对有差异,从而导致元认知的差异。我们评估了不同社会情境(即父母、家乡朋友和大学朋友)下的元准确性差异,发现与研究人员的普遍结论相反,人们确实能够察觉到自己给他人留下的相对印象。

相似文献

1
Evidence of differential meta-accuracy: people understand the different impressions they make.元准确性差异的证据:人们了解自己给他人留下的不同印象。
Psychol Sci. 2009 Aug;20(8):1033-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02409.x. Epub 2009 Jul 23.
2
Do we know who values us? Dyadic meta-accuracy in the perception of professional relationships.我们知道谁重视我们吗?职业关系认知中的二元元准确性。
Psychol Sci. 2009 Sep;20(9):1081-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02396.x. Epub 2009 Jun 30.
3
The agreeableness asymmetry in first impressions: perceivers' impulse to (mis)judge agreeableness and how it is moderated by power.第一印象中的宜人性不对称:感知者(错误)判断宜人性的冲动及其如何受到权力的调节。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2008 Dec;34(12):1719-36. doi: 10.1177/0146167208323932. Epub 2008 Sep 10.
4
Personality impressions associated with four distinct humor styles.与四种不同幽默风格相关的个性印象。
Scand J Psychol. 2010 Apr 1;51(2):115-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2009.00734.x. Epub 2009 Jun 25.
5
Meta-insight: do people really know how others see them?元洞察:人们真的知道别人如何看待他们吗?
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011 Oct;101(4):831-46. doi: 10.1037/a0024297.
6
Knowing me, knowing you: the accuracy and unique predictive validity of self-ratings and other-ratings of daily behavior.了解我,了解你:日常行为自我评定与他人评定的准确性及独特预测效度
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008 Nov;95(5):1202-16. doi: 10.1037/a0013314.
7
Look at me, I'm happy and creative: The effect of impression management on behavior in social presence.看着我,我很开心很有创造力:印象管理对社交临场感中行为的影响。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2010 Dec;36(12):1591-602. doi: 10.1177/0146167210386239. Epub 2010 Oct 18.
8
Assimilation for affiliation and contrast for control: complementary self-construals.为归属而同化,为控制而对比:互补的自我构念
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 Dec;85(6):1049-61. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.6.1049.
9
Meta-accuracy among acquainted individuals: a social relations analysis of interpersonal perception and metaperception.熟人之间的元准确性:人际感知与元感知的社会关系分析
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1997 Jan;72(1):66-74. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.72.1.66.
10
Meta-accuracy and relationship quality: Weighing the costs and benefits of knowing what people really think about you.元准确性与关系质量:权衡了解他人对你真实看法的成本与收益。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2016 Aug;111(2):250-64. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000107. Epub 2016 Jun 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Alexithymia and Impaired Mentalization: Evidence from Self-, Informant-, and Meta-Perception Ratings on the 20-Item Toronto Alexithymia Scale.述情障碍与心理化受损:来自20项多伦多述情障碍量表的自我、知情者及元感知评分的证据
J Intell. 2025 Jul 21;13(7):89. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence13070089.
2
Predicting the Irrelevant: Neural Effects of Distractor Predictability Depend on Load.预测无关信息:干扰项可预测性的神经效应取决于负荷。
Eur J Neurosci. 2025 Jan;61(2):e70005. doi: 10.1111/ejn.70005.
3
Self-, other-, and meta-perceptions of personality: Relations with burnout symptoms and eudaimonic workplace well-being.
自我、他人和元认知人格:与职业倦怠症状和幸福型工作场所的关系。
PLoS One. 2022 Jul 28;17(7):e0272095. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272095. eCollection 2022.
4
Seeing through your daughter's eyes: Factors associated with maternal meta-accuracy.透过女儿的视角:与母亲元准确性相关的因素。
Pers Relatsh. 2017 Dec;24(4):820-836. doi: 10.1111/pere.12215. Epub 2017 Oct 30.
5
Do People Know How Their Romantic Partner Views Their Emotions? Evidence for Emotion Meta-Accuray and Links with Momentary Romantic Relationship Quality.人们是否了解他们的浪漫伴侣如何看待他们的情绪?情绪元准确性的证据及其与瞬间浪漫关系质量的关系。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2023 Mar;49(3):391-404. doi: 10.1177/01461672211068225. Epub 2022 Jan 22.
6
Personality captures dissociations of subjective versus objective hearing in noise.人格特征揭示了噪声环境中主观听力与客观听力的分离。
R Soc Open Sci. 2021 Nov 10;8(11):210881. doi: 10.1098/rsos.210881. eCollection 2021 Nov.
7
Understanding and combating misperceived polarization.理解和应对被误解的极化现象。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Apr 12;376(1822):20200143. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0143. Epub 2021 Feb 22.
8
Self-other personality agreement and internalizing problems in adolescence.青少年时期的自我与他人人格一致性及内化问题
J Pers. 2020 Jun;88(3):568-583. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12511. Epub 2019 Oct 17.
9
Specificity, contexts, and reference groups matter when assessing autistic traits.在评估自闭症特征时,特异性、背景和参照群体很重要。
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 13;12(2):e0171931. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171931. eCollection 2017.
10
The Role of Metaperception in Personality Disorders: Do People with Personality Problems Know How Others Experience Their Personality?元认知在人格障碍中的作用:有个性问题的人知道别人如何看待他们的个性吗?
J Pers Disord. 2015 Aug;29(4):449-67. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2015.29.4.449.