• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预测无关信息:干扰项可预测性的神经效应取决于负荷。

Predicting the Irrelevant: Neural Effects of Distractor Predictability Depend on Load.

作者信息

Lui Troby Ka-Yan, Obleser Jonas, Wöstmann Malte

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.

Center of Brain, Behavior, and Metabolism, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.

出版信息

Eur J Neurosci. 2025 Jan;61(2):e70005. doi: 10.1111/ejn.70005.

DOI:10.1111/ejn.70005
PMID:39853833
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11760630/
Abstract

Distraction is ubiquitous in human environments. Distracting input is often predictable, but we do not understand when or how humans can exploit this predictability. Here, we ask whether predictable distractors are able to reduce uncertainty in updating the internal predictive model. We show that utilising a predictable distractor identity is not fully automatic but in part depends on available resources. In an auditory spatial n-back task, listeners (n = 33) attended to spoken numbers presented to one ear and detected repeating items. Distracting numbers presented to the other ear either followed a predictable (i.e., repetitive) sequence or were unpredictable. We used electroencephalography (EEG) to uncover neural responses to predictable versus unpredictable auditory distractors, as well as their dependence on perceptual and cognitive load. Neurally, pairs of targets and unpredictable distractors induced a sign-reversed lateralisation of pre-stimulus alpha oscillations (~10 Hz) and larger amplitude of the stimulus-evoked P2 event-related potential component. Under low versus high memory load, distractor predictability increased the magnitude of the frontal negativity component. Behaviourally, predictable distractors under low task demands (i.e., good signal-to-noise ratio and low memory load) made participants adopt a less biased response strategy. We conclude that predictable distractors decrease uncertainty and reduce the need for updating the internal predictive model. In turn, unpredictable distractors might mislead proactive spatial attention orientation, elicit larger neural responses and put higher demand on memory.

摘要

干扰在人类环境中无处不在。干扰性输入通常是可预测的,但我们并不清楚人类何时以及如何利用这种可预测性。在此,我们探讨可预测的干扰因素是否能够减少更新内部预测模型时的不确定性。我们发现,利用可预测的干扰因素身份并非完全自动进行,部分取决于可用资源。在一项听觉空间n-back任务中,听众(n = 33)专注于呈现给一只耳朵的语音数字,并检测重复的项目。呈现给另一只耳朵的干扰数字要么遵循可预测的(即重复的)序列,要么是不可预测的。我们使用脑电图(EEG)来揭示对可预测与不可预测听觉干扰因素的神经反应,以及它们对感知和认知负荷的依赖性。在神经层面,目标与不可预测的干扰因素对会诱发刺激前阿尔法振荡(约10Hz)的符号反转侧向化以及刺激诱发的P2事件相关电位成分的更大振幅。在低记忆负荷与高记忆负荷条件下,干扰因素的可预测性增加了额叶负波成分的幅度。在行为层面,低任务需求(即良好的信噪比和低记忆负荷)下的可预测干扰因素使参与者采用了偏差较小的反应策略。我们得出结论,可预测的干扰因素会降低不确定性,并减少更新内部预测模型的需求。反过来,不可预测的干扰因素可能会误导主动的空间注意力定向,引发更大的神经反应,并对记忆提出更高要求。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b425/11760630/53c1d843b806/EJN-61-0-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b425/11760630/a6a28cc9af01/EJN-61-0-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b425/11760630/6cf703133725/EJN-61-0-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b425/11760630/8b8520ca67c4/EJN-61-0-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b425/11760630/53c1d843b806/EJN-61-0-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b425/11760630/a6a28cc9af01/EJN-61-0-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b425/11760630/6cf703133725/EJN-61-0-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b425/11760630/8b8520ca67c4/EJN-61-0-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b425/11760630/53c1d843b806/EJN-61-0-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Predicting the Irrelevant: Neural Effects of Distractor Predictability Depend on Load.预测无关信息:干扰项可预测性的神经效应取决于负荷。
Eur J Neurosci. 2025 Jan;61(2):e70005. doi: 10.1111/ejn.70005.
2
Alpha Oscillations in the Human Brain Implement Distractor Suppression Independent of Target Selection.人类大脑中的阿尔法振荡独立于目标选择实现干扰抑制。
J Neurosci. 2019 Dec 4;39(49):9797-9805. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1954-19.2019. Epub 2019 Oct 22.
3
Effects of explicit knowledge and predictability on auditory distraction and target performance.显性知识和可预测性对听觉分心及目标表现的影响。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2015 Nov;98(2 Pt 1):174-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2015.09.006. Epub 2015 Sep 18.
4
Neural effects of cognitive control load on auditory selective attention.认知控制负荷对听觉选择性注意的神经影响。
Neuropsychologia. 2014 Aug;61:269-79. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.06.009. Epub 2014 Jun 16.
5
Steady-state signatures of visual perceptual load, multimodal distractor filtering, and neural competition.视觉感知负荷、多模态干扰过滤和神经竞争的稳态特征。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 May;23(5):1113-24. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2010.21460. Epub 2010 Feb 10.
6
Alpha oscillations protect auditory working memory against distractors in the encoding phase.阿尔法振荡在编码阶段保护听觉工作记忆免受干扰。
Neuropsychologia. 2025 Jan 29;207:109058. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2024.109058. Epub 2024 Nov 28.
7
Working memory capacity affects the interference control of distractors at auditory gating.工作记忆容量会影响听觉门控中对分心物的干扰控制。
Neurosci Lett. 2012 May 10;516(1):62-6. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2012.03.057. Epub 2012 Mar 28.
8
The role of alpha oscillations in distractor inhibition during memory retention.记忆保持过程中 alpha 振荡在分心物抑制中的作用。
Eur J Neurosci. 2018 Oct;48(7):2516-2526. doi: 10.1111/ejn.13852. Epub 2018 Feb 19.
9
Tracking Cognitive Spare Capacity During Speech Perception With EEG/ERP: Effects of Cognitive Load and Sentence Predictability.使用 EEG/ERP 追踪言语感知过程中的认知备用容量:认知负荷和句子可预测性的影响。
Ear Hear. 2020 Sep/Oct;41(5):1144-1157. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000856.
10
Transient Distraction and Attentional Control during a Sustained Selective Attention Task.持续选择性注意任务中的短暂分心与注意力控制
J Cogn Neurosci. 2016 Jul;28(7):935-47. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00949. Epub 2016 Mar 11.

本文引用的文献

1
The Russian war in Ukraine increased Ukrainian language use on social media.俄罗斯对乌克兰的战争增加了社交媒体上乌克兰语的使用。
Commun Psychol. 2024 Jan 10;2(1):1. doi: 10.1038/s44271-023-00045-6.
2
Distractor inhibition by alpha oscillations is controlled by an indirect mechanism governed by goal-relevant information.α振荡对干扰项的抑制作用由与目标相关信息所支配的间接机制控制。
Commun Psychol. 2024;2(1):36. doi: 10.1038/s44271-024-00081-w. Epub 2024 Apr 24.
3
Prediction during language comprehension: what is next?语言理解中的预测:接下来是什么?
Trends Cogn Sci. 2023 Nov;27(11):1032-1052. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2023.08.003. Epub 2023 Sep 11.
4
Target enhancement but not distractor suppression in auditory neural tracking during continuous speech.连续言语过程中听觉神经追踪的目标增强而非干扰抑制。
iScience. 2023 May 12;26(6):106849. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.106849. eCollection 2023 Jun 16.
5
Evaluating the Evidence for the Functional Inhibition Account of Alpha-band Oscillations during Preparatory Attention.评估预备注意期间 alpha 波段振荡的功能抑制假说的证据。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2023 Aug 1;35(8):1195-1211. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_02009.
6
Involuntary shifts of spatial attention contribute to distraction-Evidence from oscillatory alpha power and reaction time data.空间注意力的非自主转移会导致注意力分散——来自振荡阿尔法波功率和反应时间数据的证据。
Psychophysiology. 2023 Oct;60(10):e14353. doi: 10.1111/psyp.14353. Epub 2023 May 29.
7
Effects of temporally regular versus irregular distractors on goal-directed cognition and behavior.时相规则与不规则分心物对目标导向认知和行为的影响。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jun 15;12(1):10020. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-13211-3.
8
Alpha oscillations reflect suppression of distractors with increased perceptual load.阿尔法振荡反映了在感知负荷增加时对干扰物的抑制。
Prog Neurobiol. 2022 Jul;214:102285. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2022.102285. Epub 2022 May 6.
9
Ten simple rules to study distractor suppression.十条简单规则学习抑制分心物。
Prog Neurobiol. 2022 Jun;213:102269. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2022.102269. Epub 2022 Apr 12.
10
Management of validation of HPLC method for determination of acetylsalicylic acid impurities in a new pharmaceutical product.高效液相色谱法测定新型药物中乙酰水杨酸杂质的验证管理。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jan 6;12(1):1. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-99269-x.