Rheumatology Unit, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2009 Jan-Feb;27(1 Suppl 52):S53-8.
To evaluate a standardized training program and a reliability exercise in colour Doppler ultrasound (CDUS) for giant cell arteritis (GCA).
Two workshops were conducted in 2007 and 2008 to train rheumatologists in CDUS for GCA ultrasound diagnosis. Twenty-nine and forty-three participants without previous experience in GCA ultrasound were admitted in 2007 and 2008, respectively. First, some theoretical knowledge about GCA ultrasound signs was provided; second, a reader evaluation session of temporal artery video recording examinations of 27 and 30 patients were projected in the 2007 meeting and the 2008 workshop, respectively (50% were cases and 50% were controls). Twenty-four cases were common to both reader sessions. A mean of six videos were shown of each patient. Each video had to be assessed as normal or pathologic. Finally, hands-on scanning training was performed. To assess the efficacy of the workshop: 1) a structured satisfaction questionnaire was graded (1-5 Likert scale), and 2) the reliability, specificity, and percentage of correctly classified cases by each participant were calculated.
The kappa coefficient of inter-reader agreement for the 29 and 43 participants was excellent (Kappa: 0.846) in 2007 and (Kappa: 0.848) in 2008. The intra-reader kappa result was also excellent (Kappa: 0.950). The satisfaction, sensitivity, specificity, and percentage of correctly classified patients and controls were very high.
The proposed learning method seemed to be effective and well accepted by the target audience. The inter-reader reliability of GCA ultrasound was excellent. These encouraging results support the need for planned standardized training programs.
评估巨细胞动脉炎(GCA)彩色多普勒超声(CDUS)的标准化培训计划和可靠性练习。
2007 年和 2008 年举办了两次研讨会,以培训风湿病学家进行 GCA 超声诊断的 CDUS。2007 年和 2008 年分别有 29 名和 43 名无 GCA 超声经验的参与者参加。首先,提供了一些关于 GCA 超声征象的理论知识;其次,在 2007 年的会议和 2008 年的研讨会上分别投影了 27 名和 30 名患者颞动脉视频记录检查的读者评估会议(50%为病例,50%为对照)。24 例为两个读者会议共有。每位患者显示平均 6 个视频。每个视频必须被评估为正常或病理。最后,进行了实际的扫描培训。为了评估研讨会的效果:1)用结构化的满意度问卷进行评分(1-5 级李克特量表),2)计算每位参与者的可靠性、特异性和正确分类病例的百分比。
2007 年和 2008 年,29 名和 43 名参与者的读者间一致性的kappa 系数均为优秀(kappa:0.846)和(kappa:0.848)。读者内的 kappa 结果也非常优秀(kappa:0.950)。满意度、敏感度、特异性和正确分类的患者和对照的百分比非常高。
所提出的学习方法似乎是有效和被目标受众接受的。GCA 超声的读者间可靠性非常优秀。这些令人鼓舞的结果支持需要计划的标准化培训计划。