Laboratory for Neuroregeneration, Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, An Institute of the Royal Academy of Arts and Sciences, Meibergdreef 47, 1105 BA, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Exp Neurol. 2010 May;223(1):207-20. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2009.07.021. Epub 2009 Jul 28.
Reimplantation of avulsed rat lumbar spinal ventral roots results in poor recovery of function of the denervated hind limb muscles. In contrast, reimplantation of cervical or sacral ventral roots is a successful repair strategy that results in a significant degree of regeneration. A possible explanation for this difference could be that following lumbar root avulsion, axons have to travel longer distances towards their target muscles, resulting in prolonged denervation of the distal nerve and a diminished capacity to support regeneration. Here we present a detailed spatio-temporal analysis of motoneuron survival, axonal regeneration and neurotrophic factor expression following unilateral avulsion and implantation of lumbar ventral roots L3, L4, and L5. Reimplantation prolongs the survival of motoneurons up to one month post-lesion. The first regenerating motor axons entered the reimplanted ventral roots during the first week and large numbers of fibers gradually enter the lumbar plexus between 2 and 4 weeks, indicating that axons enter the reimplanted roots and plexus over an extended period of time. However, motor axon counts show that relatively few axons reach the distal sciatic nerve in the 16 week post-lesion period. The observed initial increase and subsequent decline in expression of glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor and brain-derived neurotrophic factor correlate with the apparent spatio-temporal decline in the regenerative capacity of motor axons, indicating that the distal nerve is losing its capacity to support regenerating motor axons following prolonged denervation. These findings have important implications for future strategies to promote long-distance regeneration through distal, chronically denervated peripheral nerves.
腰脊神经根撕脱后再植入大鼠,其去神经后后肢肌肉功能恢复不佳。相比之下,颈或骶脊神经根再植入是一种成功的修复策略,可实现显著程度的再生。造成这种差异的一个可能解释是,腰脊神经根撕脱后,轴突必须向靶肌肉行进更长的距离,导致远端神经去神经时间延长,支持再生的能力降低。在此,我们对单侧腰脊神经根 L3、L4 和 L5 撕脱和植入后的运动神经元存活、轴突再生和神经营养因子表达进行了详细的时空分析。再植入可延长运动神经元的存活时间,最长可达损伤后 1 个月。最早再生的运动轴突在损伤后第 1 周进入再植入的脊神经根,大量纤维在 2 至 4 周之间逐渐进入腰丛,这表明轴突在较长时间内进入再植入的脊神经根和神经丛。然而,运动轴突计数显示,在损伤后 16 周,相对较少的轴突到达远端坐骨神经。胶质细胞源性神经营养因子和脑源性神经营养因子表达的观察到的初始增加和随后的下降与运动轴突再生能力的明显时空下降相关,表明在长时间去神经后,远端神经失去了支持再生运动轴突的能力。这些发现对未来通过远端、慢性去神经的周围神经促进长距离再生的策略具有重要意义。