Suppr超能文献

关于使用双标记水法估算绿海龟(蠵龟,Chelonia mydas L.)代谢率的验证:一则警示。

Validation of the use of doubly labeled water for estimating metabolic rate in the green turtle (Chelonia mydas L.): a word of caution.

作者信息

Jones T Todd, Hastings Mervin D, Bostrom Brian L, Andrews Russel D, Jones David R

机构信息

Department of Zoology, University of British Columbia, 6270 University Boulevard, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4 Canada.

出版信息

J Exp Biol. 2009 Aug;212(Pt 16):2635-44. doi: 10.1242/jeb.029330.

Abstract

Marine turtles often have extremely high water turnover accompanied by a low field metabolic rate (FMR), a combination that can contraindicate the use of doubly labelled water (DLW). Therefore, we conducted a validation study to assess the suitability of the DLW technique for determining FMR of marine turtles. Six green turtles (22.42+/-3.13 kg) were injected with DLW and placed in a tank of seawater with a respirometer for continuous monitoring of oxygen consumption (MR) over a 5-day period. Trials were conducted for turtles in both fed and fasted states. Respiratory exchange ratio (RER) was determined in a dry respirometer and used to calculate energy expenditure. For fed and fasted turtles, total body water (TBW) was 66.67+/-3.37% and 58.70+/-7.63% of body mass, and water flux rates were 9.57+/-1.33% and 6.14+/-0.65% TBW day(-1), respectively. Water turnover in fasted turtles was 36% lower than that of fed turtles but MR (from oxygen consumption) of fasted turtles (13.77+/-1.49 kJ kg(-1) day(-1)) was 52% lower than in fed turtles (28.66+/-5.31 kJ kg(-1) day(-1)). Deuterium to oxygen-18 turnover rate (k(d):k(o)) ratios averaged 0.91+/-0.02 for fed turtles and 1.07+/-0.16 for fasted turtles. Fed turtles had a mean group difference of 8% and a mean individual difference of 53% between DLW and respirometry. The DLW method gave negative MR values in fasted turtles and could not be compared with respirometry data. Researchers should use caution when applying the DLW method in marine reptiles, especially when high water flux causes >90% of the labeled oxygen turnover to be due to water exchange.

摘要

海龟的水转换率通常极高,同时基础代谢率(FMR)较低,这种组合可能不适合使用双标记水(DLW)技术。因此,我们进行了一项验证研究,以评估DLW技术用于测定海龟FMR的适用性。六只绿海龟(体重22.42±3.13千克)被注射了DLW,并放置在一个装有呼吸计的海水箱中,持续监测其5天内的耗氧量(MR)。对处于进食和禁食状态的海龟都进行了试验。在干式呼吸计中测定呼吸交换率(RER),并用于计算能量消耗。对于进食和禁食的海龟,总体水(TBW)分别占体重的66.67±3.37%和58.70±7.63%,水通量率分别为9.57±1.33%和6.??±0.65% TBW/天。禁食海龟的水转换率比进食海龟低36%,但禁食海龟的MR(根据耗氧量计算)(13.77±1.49千焦/千克/天)比进食海龟(28.66±5.31千焦/千克/天)低52%。进食海龟的氘与氧-18转换率(k(d):k(o))平均为0.91±0.02,禁食海龟为1.07±0.16。进食海龟在DLW法和呼吸测定法之间的平均组间差异为8%,平均个体差异为53%。DLW法在禁食海龟中得出了负的MR值,无法与呼吸测定数据进行比较。研究人员在将DLW法应用于海洋爬行动物时应谨慎,尤其是当高水通量导致>90%的标记氧转换是由于水交换时。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验