• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肥胖女性心率与身体活动回忆情况与双标水法的比较

Comparison of heart rate and physical activity recall with doubly labeled water in obese women.

作者信息

Racette S B, Schoeller D A, Kushner R F

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, IL 60637.

出版信息

Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1995 Jan;27(1):126-33.

PMID:7898328
Abstract

Comparison of heart rate and physical activity recall with doubly labeled water in obese women. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc., Vol. 27, No. 1, pp. 126-133, 1995. Accurate methods of estimating total daily energy expenditure (TDEE) that are inexpensive and differentiate activities of varying intensities are needed in obesity research. We compared minute-by-minute heart rate (HR) monitoring and the 7-d physical activity recall (PAR) questionnaire with doubly labeled water (DLW) for the measurement of TDEE and physical activity in 14 obese women (45% +/- 4% fat, mean +/- SD) before and during 12 wk of weight reduction. TDEE was measured over 2 wk by DLW. HR monitoring was conducted for 3 d, with individual VO2/HR calibrations applied to HR data above 3 METs. PAR revealed the amount of time spent in sleep, moderate, hard, and very hard activities during 1 wk, with time spent in light activities determined by difference. Mean TDEE values, expressed as the % difference from DLW, prior to weight loss were -5.2 +/- 10.8% by HR and 3.4 +/- 14.4 by PAR, and during the diet were + 0.9 +/- 14.1% by HR and + 0.9 +/- 14.7% by PAR. Individual variability was high for both HR (-24.0 to + 25.6%) and PAR (-27.4 to + 36.2%). Energy expended in physical activity prior to weight loss were 3.97 +/- 1.23 MJ.d-1 by DLW, 3.91 +/- 0.90 by HR, and 4.79 +/- 0.95 by PAR. During weight loss, physical activity values by DLW, HR, and PAR were 4.31 +/- 1.18, 4.84 +/- 2.22, and 4.64 +/- 1.06 MJ.d-1, respectively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

肥胖女性心率和体力活动回忆与双标水法的比较。《医学与科学:运动与锻炼》,第27卷,第1期,第126 - 133页,1995年。肥胖研究需要廉价且能区分不同强度活动的准确估算每日总能量消耗(TDEE)的方法。我们在14名肥胖女性(体脂率45%±4%,均值±标准差)减重前及减重12周期间,将逐分钟心率(HR)监测和7天体力活动回忆(PAR)问卷与双标水法(DLW)进行比较,以测量TDEE和体力活动。TDEE通过DLW在2周内进行测量。HR监测持续3天,对高于3代谢当量(METs)的HR数据应用个体VO2/HR校准。PAR揭示了1周内睡眠、中度、剧烈和极剧烈活动所花费的时间,轻度活动时间通过差值确定。减重前,以与DLW的百分比差异表示的平均TDEE值,HR法为 - 5.2±10.8%,PAR法为3.4±14.4%;节食期间,HR法为 + 0.9±14.1%,PAR法为 + 0.9±14.7%。HR( - 24.0至 + 25.6%)和PAR( - 27.4至 + 36.2%)的个体变异性都很高。减重前通过DLW、HR和PAR测得的体力活动能量消耗分别为3.97±1.23兆焦/天、3.91±0.90兆焦/天和4.79±0.95兆焦/天。减重期间,DLW、HR和PAR测得的体力活动值分别为4.31±1.18兆焦/天、4.84±2.22兆焦/天和4.64±1.06兆焦/天。(摘要截选至250字)

相似文献

1
Comparison of heart rate and physical activity recall with doubly labeled water in obese women.肥胖女性心率与身体活动回忆情况与双标水法的比较
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1995 Jan;27(1):126-33.
2
The validity of the Stanford Seven-Day Physical Activity Recall in young adults.斯坦福七日体力活动回忆法在年轻人中的有效性。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003 Aug;35(8):1374-80. doi: 10.1249/01.MSS.0000079081.08476.EA.
3
Daily energy expenditure in free-living conditions in obese and non-obese children: comparison of doubly labelled water (2H2(18)O) method and heart-rate monitoring.肥胖和非肥胖儿童在自由生活条件下的每日能量消耗:双标记水(2H2(18)O)法与心率监测的比较。
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1995 Sep;19(9):671-7.
4
Validation of ActiReg to measure physical activity and energy expenditure against doubly labelled water in obese persons.验证ActiReg在肥胖人群中测量身体活动和能量消耗与双标水法对比的效果。
Br J Nutr. 2008 Jul;100(1):219-26. doi: 10.1017/S0007114507886363. Epub 2008 Jan 15.
5
Energy expenditure in lactating women: a comparison of doubly labeled water and heart-rate-monitoring methods.哺乳期女性的能量消耗:双标记水法与心率监测法的比较
Am J Clin Nutr. 1993 Apr;57(4):512-8. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/57.4.512.
6
Assessment of the physical activity level with two questions: validation with doubly labeled water.通过两个问题评估身体活动水平:用双标水进行验证
Int J Obes (Lond). 2008 Jun;32(6):1031-3. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2008.42. Epub 2008 Apr 8.
7
Free-living energy expenditure assessed by two different methods in rural Gambian men.通过两种不同方法评估冈比亚农村男性的自由生活能量消耗。
Eur J Clin Nutr. 1996 May;50(5):284-9.
8
Energy expenditure during an ultraendurance alpine climbing race.超耐力高山攀登比赛期间的能量消耗。
Wilderness Environ Med. 2009 Fall;20(3):225-33. doi: 10.1580/08-WEME-OR-217R3.1.
9
Underreporting of energy intake in Brazilian women varies according to dietary assessment: a cross-sectional study using doubly labeled water.巴西女性能量摄入报告不足情况因膳食评估方法而异:一项使用双标水法的横断面研究
J Am Diet Assoc. 2008 Dec;108(12):2031-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2008.09.012.
10
Physical activity questionnaire for adolescents validated against doubly labelled water.针对青少年的体力活动问卷,经双标水法验证
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2005 Mar;59(3):376-83. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602084.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical assessment for diet prescription.临床饮食处方评估。
J Prev Med Hyg. 2022 Oct 17;63(2 Suppl 3):E102-E124. doi: 10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2022.63.2S3.2753. eCollection 2022 Jun.
2
Role of Environment on Physical Activity Patterns of Older Adults Living With HIV in New York City.环境对纽约市感染艾滋病毒的老年人身体活动模式的影响
J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care. 2023;34(1):31-44. doi: 10.1097/JNC.0000000000000340. Epub 2022 May 27.
3
A systematic literature review of reviews on techniques for physical activity measurement in adults: a DEDIPAC study.
一项关于成年人身体活动测量技术的综述系统评价:DEDIPAC 研究。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2018 Feb 8;15(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0636-2.
4
Increased Physical Activity Associated with Less Weight Regain Six Years After "The Biggest Loser" Competition.《超级减肥王》比赛六年后,增加身体活动与较少的体重反弹相关。
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2017 Nov;25(11):1838-1843. doi: 10.1002/oby.21986.
5
Design and Evaluation of a Computer-Based 24-Hour Physical Activity Recall (cpar24) Instrument.基于计算机的24小时身体活动回忆(cpar24)工具的设计与评估
J Med Internet Res. 2017 May 30;19(5):e186. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7620.
6
Assessment of physical activity and energy expenditure: an overview of objective measures.体力活动和能量消耗评估:客观测量方法概述。
Front Nutr. 2014 Jun 16;1:5. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2014.00005. eCollection 2014.
7
Physical activity and change in estimated GFR among persons with CKD.身体活动与慢性肾脏病患者估算肾小球滤过率的变化。
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014 Feb;25(2):399-406. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2013040392. Epub 2013 Dec 12.
8
Practical guide to measuring physical activity.身体活动测量实用指南。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2014 Feb;114(2):199-208. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2013.09.018. Epub 2013 Nov 28.
9
Assessment of physical activity in chronic kidney disease.慢性肾脏病患者体力活动评估。
J Ren Nutr. 2013 Mar;23(2):123-31. doi: 10.1053/j.jrn.2012.04.008. Epub 2012 Jun 26.
10
Assessment tools in obesity - psychological measures, diet, activity, and body composition.肥胖评估工具——心理测量、饮食、活动和身体成分。
Physiol Behav. 2012 Aug 20;107(1):154-71. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2012.04.013. Epub 2012 Apr 24.