• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

极低频电场与癌症:评估证据

Extremely low frequency electric fields and cancer: assessing the evidence.

作者信息

Kheifets Leeka, Renew David, Sias Glenn, Swanson John

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, UCLA School of Public Health, University of California-Los Angeles, 650 Charles E. Young Drive South, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1772, USA.

出版信息

Bioelectromagnetics. 2010 Feb;31(2):89-101. doi: 10.1002/bem.20527.

DOI:10.1002/bem.20527
PMID:19650076
Abstract

Much of the research and reviews on extremely low frequency (ELF) electric and magnetic fields (EMFs) have focused on magnetic rather than electric fields. Some have considered such focus to be inappropriate and have argued that electric fields should be part of both epidemiologic and laboratory work. This paper fills the gap by systematically and critically reviewing electric-fields literature and by comparing overall strength of evidence for electric versus magnetic fields. The review of possible mechanisms does not provide any specific basis for focusing on electric fields. While laboratory studies of electric fields are few, they do not indicate that electric fields should be the exposure of interest. The existing epidemiology on residential electric-field exposures and appliance use does not support the conclusion of adverse health effects from electric-field exposure. Workers in close proximity to high-voltage transmission lines or substation equipment can be exposed to high electric fields. While there are sporadic reports of increase in cancer in some occupational studies, these are inconsistent and fraught with methodologic problems. Overall, there seems little basis to suppose there might be a risk for electric fields, and, in contrast to magnetic fields, and with a possible exception of occupational epidemiology, there seems little basis for continued research into electric fields.

摘要

关于极低频(ELF)电场和磁场(EMF)的许多研究和综述都集中在磁场而非电场方面。一些人认为这种关注点不合适,并主张电场应成为流行病学和实验室研究工作的一部分。本文通过系统且批判性地回顾电场文献,并比较电场与磁场证据的总体强度,填补了这一空白。对可能机制的综述并未为关注电场提供任何具体依据。虽然关于电场的实验室研究较少,但这些研究并未表明电场应成为感兴趣的暴露因素。现有的关于住宅电场暴露和电器使用的流行病学研究并不支持电场暴露会对健康产生不良影响这一结论。靠近高压输电线路或变电站设备的工人可能会暴露于强电场中。虽然在一些职业研究中有关于癌症发病率增加的零星报告,但这些报告并不一致,且存在诸多方法学问题。总体而言,似乎几乎没有依据认为电场可能存在风险,并且与磁场不同,除了职业流行病学可能是个例外,似乎几乎没有继续研究电场的依据。

相似文献

1
Extremely low frequency electric fields and cancer: assessing the evidence.极低频电场与癌症:评估证据
Bioelectromagnetics. 2010 Feb;31(2):89-101. doi: 10.1002/bem.20527.
2
Electric and magnetic fields at power frequencies.工频电场和磁场。
Chronic Dis Can. 2010;29 Suppl 1:69-83.
3
Exposure assessment for power frequency electric and magnetic fields.工频电场和磁场的暴露评估。
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1993 Apr;54(4):165-77. doi: 10.1080/15298669391354522.
4
Variability and consistency of electric and magnetic field occupational exposure measurements.电场和磁场职业暴露测量的变异性与一致性
J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol. 1996 Jul-Sep;6(3):355-74.
5
Possible health hazards from exposure to power-frequency electric and magnetic fields--a COMAR Technical Information Statement.暴露于工频电场和磁场可能产生的健康危害——一份COMAR技术信息声明。
IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag. 2000 Jan-Feb;19(1):131-7.
6
[Carcinogenic risk of extremely-low-frequency electromagnetic fields: state of the art].[极低频电磁场的致癌风险:最新进展]
Med Lav. 1994 Nov-Dec;85(6):447-62.
7
Occupational and residential 60-Hz electromagnetic fields and high-frequency electric transients: exposure assessment using a new dosimeter.
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1988 Aug;49(8):409-19. doi: 10.1080/15298668891379981.
8
Low-level exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields: health effects and research needs.低水平射频电磁场暴露:健康影响与研究需求。
Bioelectromagnetics. 1998;19(1):1-19.
9
[Very low frequency electric and magnetic fields and the immune system].[极低频电场与磁场和免疫系统]
Ann Ist Super Sanita. 1995;31(3):369-80.
10
Annals of conflicting results: looking back on electromagnetic field research.
CMAJ. 1996 Nov 15;155(10):1443-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Occupational exposure to extremely low-frequency magnetic fields and brain tumor risks in the INTEROCC study.职业性接触极低频磁场与INTEROCC研究中的脑肿瘤风险
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2014 Sep;23(9):1863-72. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-14-0102. Epub 2014 Jun 16.
2
Residential distance at birth from overhead high-voltage powerlines: childhood cancer risk in Britain 1962-2008.出生时住所与头顶高压输电线的距离:1962 - 2008年英国儿童癌症风险
Br J Cancer. 2014 Mar 4;110(5):1402-8. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.15. Epub 2014 Feb 6.
3
The effects of extremely low-frequency magnetic fields on melatonin and cortisol, two marker rhythms of the circadian system.
极低频磁场对褪黑素和皮质醇这两种昼夜节律系统标志物节律的影响。
Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2012 Dec;14(4):381-99. doi: 10.31887/DCNS.2012.14.4/ytouitou.
4
Electromagnetic fields, oxidative stress, and neurodegeneration.电磁场、氧化应激与神经退行性变。
Int J Cell Biol. 2012;2012:683897. doi: 10.1155/2012/683897. Epub 2012 Sep 9.
5
Mobile phone radiation health risk controversy: the reliability and sufficiency of science behind the safety standards.手机辐射健康风险争议:安全标准背后科学的可靠性和充分性。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2010 Jan 27;8(1):2. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-8-2.