• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

抗抑郁药物治疗的全国模式。

National patterns in antidepressant medication treatment.

作者信息

Olfson Mark, Marcus Steven C

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA.

出版信息

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2009 Aug;66(8):848-56. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2009.81.

DOI:10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2009.81
PMID:19652124
Abstract

CONTEXT

Antidepressants have recently become the most commonly prescribed class of medications in the United States.

OBJECTIVE

To compare sociodemographic and clinical patterns of antidepressant medication treatment in the United States between 1996 and 2005.

DESIGN

Analysis of antidepressant use data from the 1996 (n = 18 993) and 2005 (n = 28 445) Medical Expenditure Panel Surveys.

SETTING

Households in the United States.

PARTICIPANTS

Respondents aged 6 years or older who reported receiving at least 1 antidepressant prescription during that calendar year.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Rate of antidepressant use and adjusted rate ratios (ARRs) of year effect on rate of antidepressant use adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, annual family income, self-perceived mental health, and insurance status.

RESULTS

The rate of antidepressant treatment increased from 5.84% (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.47-6.23) in 1996 to 10.12% (9.58-10.69) in 2005 (ARR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.55-1.81), or from 13.3 to 27.0 million persons. Significant increases in antidepressant use were evident across all sociodemographic groups examined, except African Americans (ARR, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.89-1.44), who had comparatively low rates of use in both years (1996, 3.61%; 2005, 4.51%). Although antidepressant treatment increased for Hispanics (ARR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.60-1.90), it remained comparatively low (1996, 3.72%; 2005, 5.21%). Among antidepressant users, the percentage of patients treated for depression did not significantly change (1996, 26.25% vs 2005, 26.85%; ARR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.83-1.07), although the percentage of patients receiving antipsychotic medications (5.46% vs 8.86%; ARR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.31-2.38) increased and those undergoing psychotherapy declined (31.50% vs 19.87%; ARR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.56-0.72).

CONCLUSIONS

From 1996 to 2005, there was a marked and broad expansion in antidepressant treatment in the United States, with persisting low rates of treatment among racial/ethnic minorities. During this period, individuals treated with antidepressants became more likely to also receive treatment with antipsychotic medications and less likely to undergo psychotherapy.

摘要

背景

抗抑郁药最近已成为美国最常用的处方药类别。

目的

比较1996年至2005年美国抗抑郁药物治疗的社会人口统计学和临床模式。

设计

对1996年(n = 18993)和2005年(n = 28445)医疗支出面板调查中的抗抑郁药使用数据进行分析。

地点

美国的家庭。

参与者

年龄在6岁及以上且报告在该日历年至少接受过1次抗抑郁药处方的受访者。

主要观察指标

抗抑郁药使用率以及根据年龄、性别、种族/族裔、家庭年收入、自我感知的心理健康状况和保险状况调整后的年份对抗抑郁药使用率影响的调整率比(ARR)。

结果

抗抑郁药治疗率从1996年的5.84%(95%置信区间[CI],5.47 - 6.23)增至2005年的10.12%(9.58 - 10.69)(ARR,1.68;95% CI,1.55 - 1.81),即从1330万人增至2700万人。在所有接受调查的社会人口统计学群体中,除非洲裔美国人外(ARR,1.13;95% CI,0.89 - 1.44),抗抑郁药使用均显著增加,非洲裔美国人在这两年中的使用率相对较低(1996年为3.61%;2005年为4.51%)。尽管西班牙裔的抗抑郁药治疗有所增加(ARR,1.75;95% CI,1.60 - 1.90),但其使用率仍相对较低(1996年为3.72%;2005年为5.21%)。在抗抑郁药使用者中,因抑郁症接受治疗的患者比例没有显著变化(1996年为26.25%,2005年为26.85%;ARR,0.95;95% CI,0.83 - 1.07),尽管接受抗精神病药物治疗的患者比例有所增加(5.46%对8.86%;ARR,1.77;95% CI,1.31 - 2.38),而接受心理治疗的患者比例有所下降(31.50%对19.87%;ARR,0.65;95% CI,0.56 - 0.72)。

结论

从1996年到2005年,美国抗抑郁药治疗有显著且广泛的扩展,但种族/族裔少数群体的治疗率持续较低。在此期间,接受抗抑郁药治疗的个体更有可能同时接受抗精神病药物治疗,而接受心理治疗的可能性降低。

相似文献

1
National patterns in antidepressant medication treatment.抗抑郁药物治疗的全国模式。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2009 Aug;66(8):848-56. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2009.81.
2
Trends in Treatment and Spending for Patients Receiving Outpatient Treatment of Depression in the United States, 1998-2015.美国 1998-2015 年接受抑郁症门诊治疗患者的治疗和支出趋势。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2019 Aug 1;76(8):810-817. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.0633.
3
Outpatient prescriptions for atypical antipsychotics for African Americans, Hispanics, and whites in the United States.美国非裔、西班牙裔和白人的非典型抗精神病药物门诊处方。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2003 Feb;60(2):121-8. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.60.2.121.
4
A decline in depression treatment following FDA antidepressant warnings largely explains racial/ethnic disparities in prescription fills.美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)对抗抑郁药发出警告后,抑郁症治疗率下降,这在很大程度上解释了处方配给方面的种族/民族差异。
Depress Anxiety. 2017 Dec;34(12):1147-1156. doi: 10.1002/da.22681. Epub 2017 Sep 29.
5
National trends in the outpatient treatment of depression.抑郁症门诊治疗的全国趋势。
JAMA. 2002 Jan 9;287(2):203-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.2.203.
6
Racial and Ethnic Differences in Minimally Adequate Depression Care Among Medicaid-Enrolled Youth.医疗补助计划覆盖的青年人群中,在接受最基本的抑郁症治疗方面,不同种族和民族之间存在差异。
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2019 Jan;58(1):128-138. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2018.04.025. Epub 2018 Oct 17.
7
The relationship between antidepressant medication use and rate of suicide.抗抑郁药物使用与自杀率之间的关系。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005 Feb;62(2):165-72. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.62.2.165.
8
The relationship of antidepressant prescribing concentration to treatment duration and cost.抗抑郁药物处方浓度与治疗持续时间及成本的关系。
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2012 Mar;15(1):3-11.
9
National trends in the treatment for depression from 1998 to 2007.1998年至2007年抑郁症治疗的全国趋势。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2010 Dec;67(12):1265-73. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.151.
10
Racial-Ethnic Differences in Off-Label Antidepressant Use, by Insurance Type.种族-民族差异在保险类型下的抗抑郁药的标签外使用。
Psychiatr Serv. 2017 Dec 1;68(12):1271-1279. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201600445. Epub 2017 Aug 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychological Care Needs and Mental Health Service Use Among Adults with Diabetes: Evidence from the Diabetes, Distress, and Disparities (3D) Study.糖尿病成年人的心理护理需求与心理健康服务利用情况:来自糖尿病、困扰与差异(3D)研究的证据
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jun 14;13(12):1427. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13121427.
2
The Impact of Antidepressants on Surgical Outcomes Among Patients With Abdominal Cancer and Comorbid Depression.抗抑郁药对腹部癌症合并抑郁症患者手术结局的影响。
Psychooncology. 2025 Jun;34(6):e70210. doi: 10.1002/pon.70210.
3
Sertraline-Induced Bradycardia: A Case Report and Literature Review.
舍曲林所致心动过缓:一例报告及文献综述
Cureus. 2025 May 20;17(5):e84474. doi: 10.7759/cureus.84474. eCollection 2025 May.
4
Trend analysis of antidepressant consumption in Italy from 2008 to 2022 in a public health perspective.从公共卫生角度对2008年至2022年意大利抗抑郁药消费情况的趋势分析。
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 9;15(1):12124. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-96037-z.
5
Antidepressant Non-refill as a Proxy Measure for Medication Acceptability in Electronic Health Records.电子健康记录中抗抑郁药未再取药作为药物可接受性的替代指标
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2025;45(4):310-319. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0000000000002001. Epub 2025 Apr 7.
6
The role of education as a socialization mechanism in addressing the social gradient in depression treatment in Belgium (2004-2018).教育作为一种社会化机制在解决比利时抑郁症治疗中的社会梯度问题方面所起的作用(2004 - 2018年)。
Front Sociol. 2025 Mar 4;10:1204794. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2025.1204794. eCollection 2025.
7
Trends in research on novel antidepressant treatments.新型抗抑郁治疗的研究趋势。
Front Pharmacol. 2025 Jan 27;16:1544795. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1544795. eCollection 2025.
8
Grape Seed Extract Pretreatment Prevents Mitochondrial Dysfunction and NLRP3 Inflammasome-Induced Inflammatory Response in Glial Cells Exposed to Paroxetine and Quinolinic Acid.葡萄籽提取物预处理可预防暴露于帕罗西汀和喹啉酸的神经胶质细胞中的线粒体功能障碍和NLRP3炎性小体诱导的炎症反应。
Mol Neurobiol. 2025 Jun;62(6):7110-7123. doi: 10.1007/s12035-025-04730-x. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
9
The association between the fluoxetine use and the occurrence of coronary heart disease: a nationwide retrospective cohort study.氟西汀使用与冠心病发生的关联:一项全国性回顾性队列研究。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2024 Nov 9;24(1):628. doi: 10.1186/s12872-024-04280-5.
10
Mood and microbes: a comprehensive review of intestinal microbiota's impact on depression.情绪与微生物:肠道微生物群对抑郁症影响的综合综述
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Feb 9;15:1295766. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1295766. eCollection 2024.