• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

乳腺癌风险沟通:标准化患者对初级保健医生的评估

Breast cancer risk communication: assessment of primary care physicians by standardized patients.

作者信息

Culver Julie O, Bowen Deborah J, Reynolds Susan E, Pinsky Linda E, Press Nancy, Burke Wylie

机构信息

Department of Bioethics and Humanities, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA.

出版信息

Genet Med. 2009 Oct;11(10):735-41. doi: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181b2e5eb.

DOI:10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181b2e5eb
PMID:19661809
Abstract

PURPOSE

To assess primary care providers' communication about breast cancer risk.

METHODS

We evaluated 86 primary care providers' communication of risk using unannounced standardized (simulated) patients. Physicians were randomly assigned to receive one of three cases: (1) moderate risk case (n = 25), presenting with a breast lump and mother with postmenopausal breast cancer; (2) high-risk (maternal side) case (n = 28), presenting with concern about breast cancer risk; and (3) high-risk (paternal side) case (n = 33), presenting with an unrelated problem. After the appointment, three qualitative parameters were assessed by standardized patients on a 3-point scale (3 = highest satisfaction, 1 = lowest): whether the physician took adequate time; acknowledged her concerns; and offered reassurance.

RESULTS

Mean satisfaction with physician communication was higher for the moderate risk case (2.92) than for the high-risk paternal case (2.25) or high-risk maternal case (2.42) (P < 0.0001). The score was not influenced by session length, medical specialty, or physician gender.

CONCLUSION

Physicians more consistently provided a moderate risk standardized patients with reassurance and support compared with the high-risk cases. Primary care physicians may be more unprepared or uneasy addressing the issues raised by more complex scenarios and may benefit from training in the assessment and communication of breast cancer risk.

摘要

目的

评估基层医疗服务提供者关于乳腺癌风险的沟通情况。

方法

我们使用未事先通知的标准化(模拟)患者评估了86名基层医疗服务提供者的风险沟通情况。医生被随机分配接受三种病例之一:(1)中度风险病例(n = 25),表现为乳腺肿块且母亲患有绝经后乳腺癌;(2)高风险(母系家族)病例(n = 28),表现出对乳腺癌风险的担忧;(3)高风险(父系家族)病例(n = 33),表现出一个不相关的问题。就诊结束后,标准化患者以3分制(3 =最高满意度,1 =最低满意度)评估三个定性参数:医生是否花了足够的时间;是否承认她的担忧;以及是否给予了安慰。

结果

中度风险病例中患者对医生沟通的平均满意度(2.92)高于高风险父系家族病例(2.25)或高风险母系家族病例(2.42)(P < 0.0001)。该评分不受就诊时长、医学专业或医生性别的影响。

结论

与高风险病例相比,医生更一致地为中度风险的标准化患者提供了安慰和支持。基层医疗医生可能对处理更复杂情况中出现的问题准备不足或感到不安,可能会从乳腺癌风险评估和沟通方面的培训中受益。

相似文献

1
Breast cancer risk communication: assessment of primary care physicians by standardized patients.乳腺癌风险沟通:标准化患者对初级保健医生的评估
Genet Med. 2009 Oct;11(10):735-41. doi: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181b2e5eb.
2
Genetic assessment of breast cancer risk in primary care practice.初级医疗实践中乳腺癌风险的基因评估。
Am J Med Genet A. 2009 Mar;149A(3):349-56. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.32643.
3
Consultation planning to help breast cancer patients prepare for medical consultations: effect on communication and satisfaction for patients and physicians.咨询规划以帮助乳腺癌患者为医疗咨询做准备:对患者和医生沟通及满意度的影响
J Clin Oncol. 2002 Jun 1;20(11):2695-700. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2002.10.068.
4
Ratings of physician communication by real and standardized patients.真实患者和标准化患者对医生沟通的评分。
Ann Fam Med. 2007 Mar-Apr;5(2):151-8. doi: 10.1370/afm.643.
5
Patient satisfaction with two different models of cancer genetic services in south-east Scotland.苏格兰东南部患者对两种不同模式癌症遗传服务的满意度。
Br J Cancer. 2004 Feb 9;90(3):582-9. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601562.
6
Communicating with Daughters About Familial Risk of Breast Cancer: Individual, Family, and Provider Influences on Women's Knowledge of Cancer Risk.与女儿交流乳腺癌家族风险:影响女性癌症风险认知的个体、家庭和提供者因素。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2018 May;27(5):630-639. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2017.6528. Epub 2018 Jan 29.
7
Increasing confidence and changing behaviors in primary care providers engaged in genetic counselling.提高初级保健提供者在遗传咨询方面的信心和改变行为。
BMC Med Educ. 2017 Sep 13;17(1):163. doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-0982-4.
8
Patients' perceived support from physicians and the role of hospital characteristics.患者感知到的来自医生的支持与医院特征的作用。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2012 Oct;24(5):501-8. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzs048. Epub 2012 Aug 3.
9
Transitioning to breast cancer survivorship: perspectives of patients, cancer specialists, and primary care providers.过渡到乳腺癌生存:患者、癌症专家和初级保健提供者的观点。
J Gen Intern Med. 2009 Nov;24 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S459-66. doi: 10.1007/s11606-009-1000-2.
10
Patient-centered communication during oncology follow-up visits for breast cancer survivors: content and temporal structure.乳腺癌幸存者肿瘤学随访期间以患者为中心的沟通:内容与时间结构
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2009 Mar;36(2):E68-79. doi: 10.1188/09.onf.e68-e79.

引用本文的文献

1
Qualitative analysis of shared decision-making for chemoprevention in the primary care setting: provider-related barriers.初级保健环境中化学预防的共享决策定性分析:与提供者相关的障碍。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 Aug 4;22(1):208. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-01954-y.
2
Patient and Clinician Decision Support to Increase Genetic Counseling for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Syndrome in Primary Care: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.患者和临床医生决策支持以增加初级保健中遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌综合征的遗传咨询:一项集群随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jul 1;5(7):e2222092. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.22092.
3
Views of health professionals on risk-based breast cancer screening and its implementation in the Spanish National Health System: A qualitative discussion group study.
卫生专业人员对基于风险的乳腺癌筛查及其在西班牙国家卫生系统中的实施的看法:定性讨论组研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 4;17(2):e0263788. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263788. eCollection 2022.
4
Improving primary care identification of familial breast cancer risk using proactive invitation and decision support.利用主动邀请和决策支持提高初级保健机构对家族性乳腺癌风险的识别能力。
Fam Cancer. 2021 Jan;20(1):13-21. doi: 10.1007/s10689-020-00188-z. Epub 2020 Jun 11.
5
An Applied Framework in Support of Shared Decision Making about Genetic Testing.一个支持基因检测共同决策的应用框架。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2018 Dec 5;2018:961-969. eCollection 2018.
6
Study protocol: a cluster randomized controlled trial of web-based decision support tools for increasing BRCA1/2 genetic counseling referral in primary care.研究方案:一项关于基于网络的决策支持工具在初级保健中增加BRCA1/2基因咨询转诊的整群随机对照试验。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Aug 13;18(1):633. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3442-x.
7
Increasing confidence and changing behaviors in primary care providers engaged in genetic counselling.提高初级保健提供者在遗传咨询方面的信心和改变行为。
BMC Med Educ. 2017 Sep 13;17(1):163. doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-0982-4.
8
Young Women's Perceptions Regarding Communication with Healthcare Providers About Breast Cancer, Risk, and Prevention.年轻女性对与医疗保健提供者就乳腺癌、风险和预防进行沟通的看法。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2018 Feb;27(2):162-170. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2016.6140. Epub 2017 May 4.
9
Impact of a randomized controlled educational trial to improve physician practice behaviors around screening for inherited breast cancer.一项旨在改善医生在遗传性乳腺癌筛查方面实践行为的随机对照教育试验的影响
J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Mar;30(3):334-41. doi: 10.1007/s11606-014-3113-5. Epub 2014 Dec 2.
10
Comparative effectiveness of audit-feedback versus additional physician communication training to improve cancer screening for patients with limited health literacy.审计反馈与额外的医生沟通培训对改善健康素养有限患者癌症筛查的比较效果。
J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Aug;29(8):1113-21. doi: 10.1007/s11606-014-2782-4. Epub 2014 Feb 4.