• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

卫生专业人员对基于风险的乳腺癌筛查及其在西班牙国家卫生系统中的实施的看法:定性讨论组研究。

Views of health professionals on risk-based breast cancer screening and its implementation in the Spanish National Health System: A qualitative discussion group study.

机构信息

Department of Nursing and Physiotherapy, University of Lleida-IRBLleida, Lleida, Spain.

Health Care Research Group (GRECS), Lleida, Spain.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 Feb 4;17(2):e0263788. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263788. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0263788
PMID:35120169
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8815913/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

With the aim of increasing benefits and decreasing harms, risk-based breast cancer screening has been proposed as an alternative to age-based screening. This study explores barriers and facilitators to implementing a risk-based breast cancer screening program from the perspective of health professionals, in the context of a National Health Service.

METHODS

Socio-constructivist qualitative research carried out in Catalonia (Spain), in the year 2019. Four discussion groups were conducted, with a total of 29 health professionals from primary care, breast cancer screening programs, hospital breast units, epidemiology units, and clinical specialties. A descriptive-interpretive thematic analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Identified barriers included resistance to reducing the number of screening exams for low-risk women; resistance to change for health professionals; difficulties in risk communication; lack of conclusive evidence of the benefits of risk-based screening; limited economic resources; and organizational transformation. Facilitators include benefits of risk-based strategies for high and low-risk women; women's active role in their health care; proximity of women and primary care professionals; experience of health professionals in other screening programs; and greater efficiency of a risk-based screening program. Organizational and administrative changes in the health system, commitment by policy makers, training of health professionals, and educational interventions addressed to the general population will be required.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the expressed difficulties, participants supported the implementation of risk-based screening. They highlighted its benefits, especially for women at high risk of breast cancer and those under 50 years of age, and assumed a greater efficiency of the risk-based program compared to the aged-based one. Future studies should assess the efficiency and feasibility of risk-based breast cancer screening for its transfer to clinical practice.

摘要

背景

为了提高收益并减少危害,基于风险的乳腺癌筛查已被提议作为基于年龄的筛查的替代方法。本研究从卫生专业人员的角度探讨了在国家卫生服务背景下实施基于风险的乳腺癌筛查计划的障碍和促进因素。

方法

这是 2019 年在西班牙加泰罗尼亚进行的社会建构主义定性研究。共进行了 4 次讨论小组,共有 29 名来自初级保健、乳腺癌筛查计划、医院乳房科、流行病学科和临床专业的卫生专业人员参加。进行了描述性解释性主题分析。

结果

确定的障碍包括抵制减少低风险女性的筛查检查次数;卫生专业人员对变革的抵制;风险沟通困难;缺乏基于风险的筛查益处的明确证据;经济资源有限;以及组织转型。促进因素包括基于风险的策略对高风险和低风险女性的益处;女性在其医疗保健中的积极作用;女性与初级保健专业人员的接近程度;卫生专业人员在其他筛查计划中的经验;以及基于风险的筛查计划的更高效率。需要对卫生系统进行组织和行政变革、政策制定者的承诺、卫生专业人员的培训以及针对普通民众的教育干预。

结论

尽管存在明显的困难,参与者仍支持实施基于风险的筛查。他们强调了其益处,特别是对于乳腺癌高风险和 50 岁以下的女性,并且假设基于风险的计划比基于年龄的计划效率更高。未来的研究应评估基于风险的乳腺癌筛查的效率和可行性,以便将其转移到临床实践中。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9da/8815913/c86373b4010c/pone.0263788.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9da/8815913/c86373b4010c/pone.0263788.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9da/8815913/c86373b4010c/pone.0263788.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Views of health professionals on risk-based breast cancer screening and its implementation in the Spanish National Health System: A qualitative discussion group study.卫生专业人员对基于风险的乳腺癌筛查及其在西班牙国家卫生系统中的实施的看法:定性讨论组研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 4;17(2):e0263788. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263788. eCollection 2022.
2
Barriers and Facilitators to the Implementation of a Personalized Breast Cancer Screening Program: Views of Spanish Health Professionals.实施个性化乳腺癌筛查计划的障碍和促进因素:西班牙卫生专业人员的观点。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 27;19(3):1406. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031406.
3
A qualitative study on a decision aid for breast cancer screening: Views from women and health professionals.一项关于乳腺癌筛查决策辅助工具的定性研究:女性和健康专业人员的观点
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2017 May;26(3). doi: 10.1111/ecc.12660. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
4
Knowledge, facilitators and perceived barriers for early detection of breast cancer among elderly Turkish women.土耳其老年女性乳腺癌早期检测的知识、促进因素及感知障碍
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2011;12(4):975-84.
5
A qualitative study on Singaporean women's views towards breast cancer screening and Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) gene testing to guide personalised screening strategies.一项关于新加坡女性对乳腺癌筛查和单核苷酸多态性(SNP)基因检测以指导个体化筛查策略的看法的定性研究。
BMC Cancer. 2017 Nov 21;17(1):776. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3781-8.
6
European women's perceptions of the implementation and organisation of risk-based breast cancer screening and prevention: a qualitative study.欧洲女性对基于风险的乳腺癌筛查和预防的实施和组织的看法:一项定性研究。
BMC Cancer. 2020 Mar 24;20(1):247. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-06745-0.
7
Opportunities and Barriers to Breast Cancer Screening in a Rural Community in Coastal Karnataka, India: A Qualitative Analysis.印度卡纳塔克邦沿海农村社区乳腺癌筛查的机遇与挑战:定性分析。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2020 Sep 1;21(9):2569-2575. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2020.21.9.2569.
8
Women's perceptions of personalized risk-based breast cancer screening and prevention: An international focus group study.女性对基于个性化风险的乳腺癌筛查和预防的认知:一项国际焦点小组研究。
Psychooncology. 2019 May;28(5):1056-1062. doi: 10.1002/pon.5051. Epub 2019 Mar 25.
9
"Cervical cancer screening: awareness is not enough". Understanding barriers to screening among women in West Cameroon-a qualitative study using focus groups."宫颈癌筛查:仅有意识是不够的"。了解喀麦隆西部妇女筛查障碍的定性研究:使用焦点小组。
Reprod Health. 2021 Jul 9;18(1):147. doi: 10.1186/s12978-021-01186-9.
10
Healthcare professionals' views following implementation of risk stratification into a national breast cancer screening programme.实施风险分层后,医疗保健专业人员对国家乳腺癌筛查计划的看法。
BMC Cancer. 2022 Oct 12;22(1):1058. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-10134-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Do women with a history of breast cancer recommend risk-based breast cancer screening? An in-depth interview study.有乳腺癌病史的女性会推荐基于风险的乳腺癌筛查吗?一项深入访谈研究。
Front Psychol. 2025 Apr 22;16:1414099. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1414099. eCollection 2025.
2
Primary care providers' experience and satisfaction with personalised breast cancer screening risk communication: a descriptive cross-sectional study.初级保健提供者对个性化乳腺癌筛查风险沟通的体验与满意度:一项描述性横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2025 May 2;15(5):e093936. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-093936.
3
Navigating the risks: Stakeholder views on risk-based cervical cancer screening.

本文引用的文献

1
Breast Cancer Risk Assessment and Primary Prevention Advice in Primary Care: A Systematic Review of Provider Attitudes and Routine Behaviours.基层医疗中乳腺癌风险评估与一级预防建议:对医疗服务提供者态度和常规行为的系统评价
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Aug 18;13(16):4150. doi: 10.3390/cancers13164150.
2
Generalizability of Polygenic Risk Scores for Breast Cancer Among Women With European, African, and Latinx Ancestry.多基因风险评分在具有欧洲、非洲和拉丁裔血统的女性乳腺癌中的可推广性。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Aug 2;4(8):e2119084. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.19084.
3
Cost-effectiveness of risk-based breast cancer screening: A systematic review.
应对风险:利益相关者对基于风险的宫颈癌筛查的看法。
PLoS One. 2025 Mar 5;20(3):e0317986. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317986. eCollection 2025.
4
Acceptability and perceptions of personalised risk-based cancer screening among health-care professionals and the general public: a systematic review and meta-analysis.医疗保健专业人员和公众对基于个性化风险的癌症筛查的可接受性和认知:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lancet Public Health. 2025 Feb;10(2):e85-e96. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(24)00278-0.
5
Risk-Stratified Breast Cancer Screening in Malaysia: Challenges and Opportunities.马来西亚风险分层乳腺癌筛查:挑战与机遇。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2024 Mar 1;25(3):785-791. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2024.25.3.785.
6
"For and against" factors influencing participation in personalized breast cancer screening programs: a qualitative systematic review until March 2022.影响参与个性化乳腺癌筛查项目的“支持与反对”因素:截至2022年3月的定性系统评价
Arch Public Health. 2024 Feb 22;82(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s13690-024-01248-x.
7
Implementation considerations for risk-tailored cancer screening in the population: A scoping review.风险定制癌症筛查在人群中的实施考虑因素:范围综述。
Prev Med. 2024 Apr;181:107897. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2024.107897. Epub 2024 Feb 18.
8
A Comprehensive Review of Breast Fibroadenoma: Correlating Clinical and Pathological Findings.乳腺纤维腺瘤综合综述:临床与病理结果的关联
Cureus. 2023 Dec 5;15(12):e49948. doi: 10.7759/cureus.49948. eCollection 2023 Dec.
9
Canadian Healthcare Professionals' Views and Attitudes toward Risk-Stratified Breast Cancer Screening.加拿大医疗保健专业人员对风险分层乳腺癌筛查的看法和态度。
J Pers Med. 2023 Jun 21;13(7):1027. doi: 10.3390/jpm13071027.
10
Barriers to Implementation of Breast Cancer Risk Assessment: The Health Care Team Perspective.实施乳腺癌风险评估的障碍:医疗保健团队的观点。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2023 Mar;20(3):342-351. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2022.12.019.
基于风险的乳腺癌筛查的成本效益:一项系统综述。
Int J Cancer. 2021 Apr 12. doi: 10.1002/ijc.33593.
4
Evaluating Polygenic Risk Scores for Breast Cancer in Women of African Ancestry.评估非洲裔裔女性乳腺癌的多基因风险评分。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2021 Sep 4;113(9):1168-1176. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djab050.
5
Healthcare professionals' behaviour regarding the implementation of shared decision-making in screening programmes: A systematic review.卫生保健专业人员在筛查项目中实施共同决策的行为:系统评价。
Patient Educ Couns. 2021 Aug;104(8):1933-1944. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.01.032. Epub 2021 Jan 30.
6
Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries.《全球癌症统计数据 2020:全球 185 个国家和地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率估计》。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
7
[PAPPS Cancer Expert Group. Cancer Prevention Recommendations. 2020 PAPPS update].[PAPPS癌症专家小组。癌症预防建议。2020年PAPPS更新版]
Aten Primaria. 2020 Nov;52 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):44-69. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2020.09.003.
8
Feasibility and acceptability of personalised breast cancer screening (DECIDO study): protocol of a single-arm proof-of-concept trial.个性化乳腺癌筛查的可行性与可接受性(DECIDO研究):单臂概念验证试验方案
BMJ Open. 2020 Dec 23;10(12):e044597. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044597.
9
Dutch women's intended participation in a risk-based breast cancer screening and prevention programme: a survey study identifying preferences, facilitators and barriers.荷兰女性参与基于风险的乳腺癌筛查和预防计划的意愿:一项调查研究,确定偏好、促进因素和障碍。
BMC Cancer. 2020 Oct 6;20(1):965. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07464-2.
10
Risk stratified breast cancer screening: UK healthcare policy decision-making stakeholders' views on a low-risk breast screening pathway.风险分层乳腺癌筛查:英国医疗保健政策决策利益相关者对低风险乳腺癌筛查途径的看法。
BMC Cancer. 2020 Jul 22;20(1):680. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07158-9.