• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Qualitative analysis of shared decision-making for chemoprevention in the primary care setting: provider-related barriers.初级保健环境中化学预防的共享决策定性分析:与提供者相关的障碍。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 Aug 4;22(1):208. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-01954-y.
2
Pilot study of decision support tools on breast cancer chemoprevention for high-risk women and healthcare providers in the primary care setting.高危女性和初级保健环境中的医疗保健提供者的乳腺癌化学预防决策支持工具的初步研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2018 Dec 17;18(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s12911-018-0716-5.
3
Perceptions of Racially and Ethnically Diverse Women at High Risk of Breast Cancer Regarding the Use of a Web-Based Decision Aid for Chemoprevention: Qualitative Study Nested Within a Randomized Controlled Trial.高乳腺癌风险的不同种族和民族的女性对使用基于网络的化学预防决策辅助工具的看法:随机对照试验中嵌套的定性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jun 8;23(6):e23839. doi: 10.2196/23839.
4
Patient and Provider Web-Based Decision Support for Breast Cancer Chemoprevention: A Randomized Controlled Trial.患者和医疗服务提供者在线决策支持在乳腺癌化学预防中的应用:一项随机对照试验。
Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2022 Oct 4;15(10):689-700. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-22-0013.
5
Use of web-based decision support to improve informed choice for chemoprevention: a qualitative analysis of pre-implementation interviews (SWOG S1904).利用基于网络的决策支持来提高化学预防的知情选择:实施前访谈的定性分析(SWOG S1904)。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Sep 27;24(1):272. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02691-0.
6
Breast Cancer Chemoprevention: A Practical Guide for the Primary Care Provider.乳腺癌化学预防:初级保健提供者实用指南。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2020 Jan;29(1):46-56. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2018.7643. Epub 2019 Sep 27.
7
Breast Cancer Chemoprevention among High-risk Women and those with Ductal Carcinoma In Situ.高危女性及导管原位癌患者的乳腺癌化学预防
Breast J. 2015 Jul-Aug;21(4):377-86. doi: 10.1111/tbj.12418. Epub 2015 Apr 16.
8
Addressing barriers to uptake of breast cancer chemoprevention for patients and providers.解决患者和医疗服务提供者在接受乳腺癌化学预防方面的障碍。
Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2015:e50-8. doi: 10.14694/EdBook_AM.2015.35.e50.
9
Engaging Women with Limited Health Literacy in Mammography Decision-Making: Perspectives of Patients and Primary Care Providers.参与健康素养有限的女性进行乳房 X 光检查决策:患者和初级保健提供者的观点。
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Apr;36(4):938-945. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06213-2. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
10
Study protocol: Randomized controlled trial of web-based decision support tools for high-risk women and healthcare providers to increase breast cancer chemoprevention.研究方案:针对高危女性和医疗保健提供者的基于网络的决策支持工具增加乳腺癌化学预防的随机对照试验。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2019 Aug 22;16:100433. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2019.100433. eCollection 2019 Dec.

引用本文的文献

1
Perceptions of chemoprevention among individuals at high risk of oral cancer: qualitative study within the UK-based SAVER trial.口腔癌高危个体对化学预防的认知:基于英国SAVER试验的定性研究
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 17;15(6):e101326. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-101326.
2
User Comprehension and EHR Integration of the Decision Aid for Breast Cancer Risk Assessment: A Qualitative Study.乳腺癌风险评估决策辅助工具的用户理解与电子健康记录整合:一项定性研究
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2025 May 22;2024:1129-1138. eCollection 2024.
3
Shared Decision Making Among Racially and/or Ethnically Diverse Populations in Primary Care: A Scoping Review of Barriers and Facilitators.初级保健中不同种族和/或族裔人群的共同决策:障碍与促进因素的范围综述
Ann Fam Med. 2025 Mar 24;23(2):108-116. doi: 10.1370/afm.240087.
4
Developing decision support tools for high-risk women and healthcare providers to increase chemoprevention informed choice and uptake: A retrospective translational science case study.为高危女性和医疗服务提供者开发决策支持工具,以提高化学预防的知情选择和接受率:一项回顾性转化科学案例研究。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2024 Sep 10;8(1):e115. doi: 10.1017/cts.2024.565. eCollection 2024.
5
Use of web-based decision support to improve informed choice for chemoprevention: a qualitative analysis of pre-implementation interviews (SWOG S1904).利用基于网络的决策支持来提高化学预防的知情选择:实施前访谈的定性分析(SWOG S1904)。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Sep 27;24(1):272. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02691-0.
6
Making Informed Choices On Incorporating Chemoprevention into carE (MiCHOICE, SWOG 1904): Design and methods of a cluster randomized controlled trial.在护理中做出明智的选择,纳入化学预防(MiCHOICE,SWOG1904):一项集群随机对照试验的设计和方法。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2024 Jul;142:107564. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2024.107564. Epub 2024 May 3.
7
A Scoping Review of Personalized, Interactive, Web-Based Clinical Decision Tools Available for Breast Cancer Prevention and Screening in the United States.美国可用于乳腺癌预防和筛查的个性化、交互式、基于网络的临床决策工具的范围综述
MDM Policy Pract. 2024 Mar 17;9(1):23814683241236511. doi: 10.1177/23814683241236511. eCollection 2024 Jan-Jun.
8
Barriers to Mammography Screening among Black Women at a Community Health Center in South Florida, USA.美国南佛罗里达州一家社区健康中心黑人女性进行乳腺钼靶筛查的障碍
Med Res Arch. 2023 Apr;11(4). doi: 10.18103/mra.v11i4.3814. Epub 2023 Apr 25.

本文引用的文献

1
Patient and Provider Web-Based Decision Support for Breast Cancer Chemoprevention: A Randomized Controlled Trial.患者和医疗服务提供者在线决策支持在乳腺癌化学预防中的应用:一项随机对照试验。
Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2022 Oct 4;15(10):689-700. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-22-0013.
2
Breast cancer risk reduction: who, why, and what?乳腺癌风险降低:谁、为什么以及什么?
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2022 Sep;83:36-45. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2021.11.012. Epub 2021 Dec 8.
3
Understanding low chemoprevention uptake by women at high risk of breast cancer: findings from a qualitative inductive study of women's risk-reduction experiences.了解高乳腺癌风险女性对化学预防措施的低接受度:基于女性风险降低经验的定性归纳研究结果。
BMC Womens Health. 2021 Apr 16;21(1):157. doi: 10.1186/s12905-021-01279-4.
4
Observer Ratings of Shared Decision Making Do Not Match Patient Reports: An Observational Study in 5 Family Medicine Practices.观察者对共享决策的评估与患者报告不符:5 家家庭医学实践中的观察性研究。
Med Decis Making. 2021 Jan;41(1):51-59. doi: 10.1177/0272989X20977885.
5
Potential Unintended Consequences Of Recent Shared Decision Making Policy Initiatives.近期共享决策政策倡议的潜在意外后果。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2019 Nov;38(11):1876-1881. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.00243.
6
Study protocol: Randomized controlled trial of web-based decision support tools for high-risk women and healthcare providers to increase breast cancer chemoprevention.研究方案:针对高危女性和医疗保健提供者的基于网络的决策支持工具增加乳腺癌化学预防的随机对照试验。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2019 Aug 22;16:100433. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2019.100433. eCollection 2019 Dec.
7
Breast cancer chemoprevention: An update on current practice and opportunities for primary care physicians.乳腺癌化学预防:当前实践的更新和初级保健医生的机会。
Prev Med. 2019 Dec;129:105834. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.105834. Epub 2019 Sep 5.
8
Medication Use to Reduce Risk of Breast Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.药物预防乳腺癌的使用:美国预防服务工作组推荐声明。
JAMA. 2019 Sep 3;322(9):857-867. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.11885.
9
Medication Use for the Risk Reduction of Primary Breast Cancer in Women: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.女性原发性乳腺癌风险降低的药物治疗:美国预防服务工作组的更新证据报告和系统评价。
JAMA. 2019 Sep 3;322(9):868-886. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.5780.
10
What Is the Effectiveness of Patient Decision Aids for Cancer-Related Decisions? A Systematic Review Subanalysis.患者决策辅助工具对癌症相关决策的有效性如何?一项系统评价子分析。
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2018 Dec;2:1-13. doi: 10.1200/CCI.17.00148.

初级保健环境中化学预防的共享决策定性分析:与提供者相关的障碍。

Qualitative analysis of shared decision-making for chemoprevention in the primary care setting: provider-related barriers.

机构信息

Christine E. Lynn College of Nursing, Florida Atlantic University, 777 Glades Road, Boca Raton, FL, 33431, USA.

Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 Aug 4;22(1):208. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-01954-y.

DOI:10.1186/s12911-022-01954-y
PMID:35927732
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9354269/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Chemoprevention with anti-estrogens, such as tamoxifen, raloxifene or aromatase inhibitors, have been shown to reduce breast cancer risk in randomized controlled trials; however, uptake among women at high-risk for developing breast cancer remains low. The aim of this study is to identify provider-related barriers to shared decision-making (SDM) for chemoprevention in the primary care setting.

METHODS

Primary care providers (PCPs) and high-risk women eligible for chemoprevention were enrolled in a pilot study and a randomized clinical trial of web-based decision support tools to increase chemoprevention uptake. PCPs included internists, family practitioners, and gynecologists, whereas patients were high-risk women, age 35-75 years, who had a 5-year invasive breast cancer risk ≥ 1.67%, according to the Gail model. Seven clinical encounters of high-risk women and their PCPs who were given access to these decision support tools were included in this study. Audio-recordings of the clinical encounters were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using grounded theory methodology.

RESULTS

Six primary care providers, of which four were males (mean age 36 [SD 6.5]) and two were females (mean age 39, [SD 11.5]) and seven racially/ethnically diverse high-risk female patients participated in this study. Qualitative analysis revealed three themes: (1) Competing demands during clinical encounters; (2) lack of knowledge among providers about chemoprevention; and (3) limited risk communication during clinical encounters.

CONCLUSIONS

Critical barriers to SDM about chemoprevention were identified among PCPs. Providers need education and resources through decision support tools to engage in risk communication and SDM with their high-risk patients, and to gain confidence in prescribing chemoprevention in the primary care setting.

摘要

背景

在随机对照试验中,抗雌激素药物如他莫昔芬、雷洛昔芬或芳香酶抑制剂的化学预防已被证明可降低乳腺癌风险;然而,在有发展为乳腺癌高风险的女性中,这种药物的使用率仍然很低。本研究旨在确定初级保健环境中化学预防共享决策(SDM)中与提供者相关的障碍。

方法

初级保健提供者(PCP)和有资格接受化学预防的高危女性参加了一项试点研究和一项基于网络的决策支持工具的随机临床试验,以提高化学预防的使用率。PCP 包括内科医生、家庭医生和妇科医生,而患者是年龄在 35-75 岁之间、根据 Gail 模型具有 5 年侵袭性乳腺癌风险≥1.67%的高危女性。本研究纳入了接受这些决策支持工具的高危女性及其 PCP 的 7 次临床接触。临床接触的音频记录被逐字转录,并使用扎根理论方法进行分析。

结果

本研究纳入了 6 名初级保健提供者,其中 4 名男性(平均年龄 36 [SD 6.5])和 2 名女性(平均年龄 39 [SD 11.5])和 7 名不同种族/族裔的高危女性患者。定性分析揭示了三个主题:(1)临床接触期间的竞争需求;(2)提供者对化学预防的知识不足;(3)临床接触期间的风险沟通有限。

结论

在 PCP 中确定了化学预防 SDM 的关键障碍。提供者需要通过决策支持工具获得教育和资源,以便与他们的高危患者进行风险沟通和 SDM,并在初级保健环境中对开处化学预防药物有信心。