Levitsky Adrian, Erlandsson Malin C, van Vollenhoven Ronald F, Bokarewa Maria I
Unit for Clinical Therapy Research, Inflammatory Diseases (ClinTRID), Karolinska Institutet, D1:00, Karolinska University Hospital, 17176, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Rheumatology and Inflammation Research, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
BMC Med. 2015 Sep 30;13:247. doi: 10.1186/s12916-015-0485-2.
The identification of biomarkers that predict optimal and individual choices of treatment for patients with rheumatoid arthritis gains increasing attention. The purpose of this study was to investigate if the proto-oncogene survivin might aid in treatment decisions in early rheumatoid arthritis.
Serum survivin levels were measured in 302 patients who completed the Swedish pharmacotherapy (SWEFOT) trial at baseline, 3, 12, and 24 months. Survivin levels > 0.45 ng/mL were considered positive. Based on the survivin status, core set outcomes measuring disease activity, functional disability, as well as global health and pain were evaluated after methotrexate (MTX) monotherapy at 3 months, and at 12 and 24 months of follow-up. Treatment of non-responders was randomly intensified with either a combination of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (triple therapy: MTX, sulfasalazine, and hydroxychloroquine) or by adding antibodies against tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF).
Antirheumatic treatment resulted in an overall decrease of serum survivin levels. Survivin-positive patients at baseline who initially responded to MTX had a higher risk of disease re-activation (OR 3.21 (95% CI 1.12-9.24), P = 0.032) and failed to improve in their functional disability (P = 0.018) if having continued on MTX monotherapy compared to survivin-negative patients. Ever-smokers who were survivin-positive were less likely to respond to MTX than those who were survivin-negative (OR 1.91 (1.01-3.62), P = 0.045). In survivin-positive patients, triple therapy led to better improvements in disease activity than did MTX + anti-TNF. At 24 months, survivin-positive patients randomized to anti-TNF had a higher risk of active disease than those randomized to triple therapy (OR 3.15 (1.09-9.10), P = 0.037).
We demonstrate for the first time that survivin is a valuable serologic marker that can distinguish drug-specific clinical responses in early rheumatoid arthritis through the pragmatic clinical setting of the care-based SWEFOT trial. Although treatment response cannot solely be attributable to survivin status, per protocol sensitivity analyses confirmed the superior effect of triple therapy on survivin-positive patients.
Survivin-positive patients have poor outcomes if treated with MTX monotherapy. A decrease of survivin levels during treatment is associated with better clinical responses. For survivin-positive patients who fail MTX, triple therapy is associated with better outcomes than anti-TNF therapy.
WHO database at the Karolinska University Hospital: CT20080004 ; ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00764725, registered 1 October 2008.
识别可预测类风湿关节炎患者最佳个体化治疗选择的生物标志物越来越受到关注。本研究的目的是调查原癌基因生存素是否有助于早期类风湿关节炎的治疗决策。
在302例完成瑞典药物治疗(SWEFOT)试验的患者中,于基线、3个月、12个月和24个月时测量血清生存素水平。生存素水平>0.45 ng/mL被视为阳性。根据生存素状态,在甲氨蝶呤(MTX)单药治疗3个月、随访12个月和24个月时,评估测量疾病活动、功能残疾以及整体健康和疼痛的核心指标结局。对无反应者的治疗随机强化,采用改善病情抗风湿药联合治疗(三联疗法:MTX、柳氮磺胺吡啶和羟氯喹)或添加抗肿瘤坏死因子抗体(抗TNF)。
抗风湿治疗导致血清生存素水平总体下降。基线时生存素阳性且最初对MTX有反应的患者,如果继续接受MTX单药治疗,与生存素阴性患者相比,疾病重新激活的风险更高(OR 3.21(95%CI 1.12 - 9.24),P = 0.032),且功能残疾无改善(P = 0.018)。生存素阳性的曾经吸烟者对MTX的反应比生存素阴性者更差(OR 1.91(1.01 - 3.62),P = 0.045)。在生存素阳性患者中,三联疗法比MTX + 抗TNF能更好地改善疾病活动。在24个月时,随机接受抗TNF治疗的生存素阳性患者活动性疾病的风险高于随机接受三联疗法的患者(OR 3.15(1.09 - 9.10),P = 0.037)。
我们首次证明,通过基于护理的SWEFOT试验这一务实的临床环境,生存素是一种有价值的血清学标志物,可区分早期类风湿关节炎中药物特异性的临床反应。虽然治疗反应不能仅归因于生存素状态,但根据方案的敏感性分析证实了三联疗法对生存素阳性患者的优越效果。
生存素阳性患者接受MTX单药治疗预后较差。治疗期间生存素水平下降与更好的临床反应相关。对于MTX治疗失败的生存素阳性患者,三联疗法比抗TNF治疗预后更好。
卡罗林斯卡大学医院WHO数据库:CT20080004;ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT00764725,2008年10月1日注册。