Precision of traditional approaches for lumbar plexus block: impact and management of interindividual anatomic variability.

BACKGROUND

Traditional methods for approaching the lumbar plexus from the posterior rely on finding the intersection of lines that are drawn based on surface landmarks. These methods may be inaccurate in many cases. The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy of these traditional approaches and determine if modifications could increase their accuracy.

METHODS

The lumbar plexus region of 48 cadavers (78 +/- 7 yr; 167 +/- 6 cm; 60 +/- 13 kg; men/women: 29/19) was dissected, and relevant anatomic structures were marked. Needle proximity curves were obtained by triangulation for the five traditional approaches and for vectors from the posterior superior iliac spine directed towards the lumbar spinous processes of L3 and towards L4.

RESULTS

Proximity curves (mean +/- SD) showed that except Pandin's approach (13 +/- 5 mm too medial), all others were too lateral: Winnie (17 +/- 8 mm), Chayen (8 +/- 5 mm), Capdevila (6 +/- 4 mm), and Dekrey (17 +/- 6 mm). Further, the curves had a narrow parabolic shape and thus a narrow margin of error. Both diagonal vectors had a significantly higher proximity to the lumbar plexus as compared with traditional approaches with a wide parabola, indicating more error tolerance. Using the vector posterior superior iliac spine-L3 with a length between 1/6-1/3 (= 16-22 mm) of the distance posterior superior iliac spine-L3, a proximity to the lumbar plexus < 5.0 +/- 0.3 mm was reached.

CONCLUSION

Improvement of both the proximity and the margin of error is possible by using diagonal landmark vectors. Relying on the position of the posterior superior iliac spine eliminates the sex and sided differences and individual body size, which can be problematic if firm metric distances are used in determining the entry point.