• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于皮褶厚度的模型对于评估高水平运动员身体成分的变化是否准确且适用?

Are skinfold-based models accurate and suitable for assessing changes in body composition in highly trained athletes?

作者信息

Silva Analiza M, Fields David A, Quitério Ana L, Sardinha Luís B

机构信息

Exercise and Health Laboratory, Faculty of Human Movement-Technical University of Lisbon, Portugal.

出版信息

J Strength Cond Res. 2009 Sep;23(6):1688-96. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181b3f0e4.

DOI:10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181b3f0e4
PMID:19675495
Abstract

This study was designed to assess the usefulness of skinfold (SKF) equations developed by Jackson and Pollock (JP) and by Evans (Ev) in tracking body composition changes (relative fat mass [%FM], absolute fat mass [FM], and fat-free mass [FFM]) of elite male judo athletes before a competition using a 4-compartment (4C) model as the reference method. A total of 18 male, top-level (age: 22.6 +/- 2.9 yr) athletes were evaluated at baseline (weight: 73.4 +/- 7.9 kg; %FM4C: 7.0 +/- 3.3%; FM4C: 5.1 +/- 2.6 kg; and FFM4C: 68.3 +/- 7.3 kg) and before a competition (weight: 72.7 +/- 7.5 kg; %FM4C: 6.5 +/- 3.4%; FM4C: 4.8 +/- 2.6 kg; and FFM4C: 67.9 +/- 7.1 kg). Measures of body density assessed by air displacement plethysmography, bone mineral content by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry, and total-body water by bioelectrical impedance spectroscopy were used to estimate 4C model %FM, FM, and FFM. Seven SKF site models using both JP and Ev were used to estimate %FM, FM, and FFM along with the simplified Ev3SKF site. Changes in %FM, FM, and FFM were not significantly different from the 4C model. The regression model for the SKF in question and the reference method did not differ from the line of identity in estimating changes in %FM, FM, and FFM. The limits of agreement were similar, ranging from -3.4 to 3.6 for %FM, -2.7 to 2.5 kg for FM, and -2.5 to 2.7 kg for FFM. Considering the similar performance of both 7SKF- and 3SKF-based equations compared with the criterion method, these data indicate that either the 7- or 3-site SFK models are not valid to detect %FM, FM, and FFM changes of highly trained athletes. These results highlighted the inaccuracy of anthropometric models in tracking desired changes in body composition of elite male judo athletes before a competition.

摘要

本研究旨在评估由杰克逊和波洛克(JP)以及埃文斯(Ev)开发的皮褶厚度(SKF)方程,在以四成分(4C)模型作为参考方法的情况下,追踪精英男子柔道运动员比赛前身体成分变化(相对脂肪量[%FM]、绝对脂肪量[FM]和去脂体重[FFM])的有效性。共有18名男性顶级运动员(年龄:22.6±2.9岁)在基线时(体重:73.4±7.9千克;%FM4C:7.0±3.3%;FM4C:5.1±2.6千克;FFM4C:68.3±7.3千克)以及比赛前(体重:72.7±7.5千克;%FM4C:6.5±3.4%;FM4C:4.8±2.6千克;FFM4C:67.9±7.1千克)接受了评估。通过空气置换体积描记法评估身体密度、通过双能X射线吸收法评估骨矿物质含量以及通过生物电阻抗光谱法评估全身水含量,以估算4C模型的%FM、FM和FFM。使用了同时采用JP和Ev的7个SKF部位模型以及简化的Ev3SKF部位模型来估算%FM、FM和FFM。%FM、FM和FFM的变化与4C模型无显著差异。所讨论的SKF回归模型与参考方法在估算%FM、FM和FFM变化方面与恒等线无差异。一致性界限相似,%FM为-3.4至3.6,FM为-2.7至2.5千克,FFM为-2.5至2.7千克。考虑到基于7SKF和3SKF的方程与标准方法相比表现相似,这些数据表明7部位或3部位的SFK模型均无法有效检测出训练有素运动员的%FM、FM和FFM变化。这些结果凸显了人体测量模型在追踪精英男子柔道运动员比赛前身体成分预期变化方面的不准确之处。

相似文献

1
Are skinfold-based models accurate and suitable for assessing changes in body composition in highly trained athletes?基于皮褶厚度的模型对于评估高水平运动员身体成分的变化是否准确且适用?
J Strength Cond Res. 2009 Sep;23(6):1688-96. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181b3f0e4.
2
Is bioelectrical impedance spectroscopy accurate in estimating changes in fat-free mass in judo athletes?生物电阻抗光谱法在评估柔道运动员去脂体重变化时是否准确?
J Sports Sci. 2012;30(12):1225-33. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2012.692481. Epub 2012 Jun 14.
3
The usefulness of Tanita TBF-310 for body composition assessment in Judo athletes using a four-compartment molecular model as the reference method.以四室分子模型作为参考方法,探讨百利达TBF-310在柔道运动员身体成分评估中的实用性。
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2019 Nov 7;65(10):1283-1289. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.65.10.1283. eCollection 2019.
4
Estimating fat-free mass in elite-level male rowers: a four-compartment model validation of laboratory and field methods.精英水平男性赛艇运动员无脂肪体重的估算:实验室和现场方法的四室模型验证
J Sports Sci. 2017 Apr;35(7):624-633. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2016.1183802. Epub 2016 May 9.
5
Accuracy of DXA in estimating body composition changes in elite athletes using a four compartment model as the reference method.应用四室模型作为参考方法评估 DXA 估计精英运动员身体成分变化的准确性。
Nutr Metab (Lond). 2010 Mar 22;7:22. doi: 10.1186/1743-7075-7-22.
6
Impact of food and fluid intake on technical and biological measurement error in body composition assessment methods in athletes.食物和液体摄入量对运动员身体成分评估方法中技术和生物学测量误差的影响。
Br J Nutr. 2017 Feb;117(4):591-601. doi: 10.1017/S0007114517000551.
7
Validation of air-displacement plethysmography for estimation of body fat mass in healthy elderly subjects.健康老年受试者中空气置换体积描记法用于估计体脂量的验证
Eur J Nutr. 2003 Aug;42(4):207-16. doi: 10.1007/s00394-003-0416-4.
8
Body composition in prepubertal girls: comparison of six methods.青春期前女孩的身体成分:六种方法的比较
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2001 Sep;25(9):1352-9. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0801731.
9
Estimation of Hydration and Density of Fat-Free Mass in Indian Children Using a 4-Compartment Model: Implications for the Estimation of Body Composition Using 2-Compartment Models.使用四室模型估算印度儿童去脂体重的水分和密度:对使用双室模型估算身体成分的影响。
J Nutr. 2023 Feb;153(2):435-442. doi: 10.1016/j.tjnut.2022.12.025. Epub 2022 Dec 28.
10
Comparison of body composition assessment methods in patients with human immunodeficiency virus-associated wasting receiving growth hormone.接受生长激素治疗的人类免疫缺陷病毒相关消瘦患者身体成分评估方法的比较
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006 Aug;91(8):2952-9. doi: 10.1210/jc.2006-0431. Epub 2006 Jun 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Validity between dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and bioelectrical impedance for segmental fat analysis and a novel low-cost model developed using anthropometry in young adults.双能X线吸收法与生物电阻抗法在分段脂肪分析中的有效性以及一种利用人体测量学为年轻成年人开发的新型低成本模型。
J Transl Med. 2025 Jan 10;23(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s12967-024-06062-1.
2
Multicomponent body composition of university club sport athletes.大学俱乐部体育运动员的多组分身体成分
J Int Soc Sports Nutr. 2025 Dec;22(1):2446575. doi: 10.1080/15502783.2024.2446575. Epub 2024 Dec 26.
3
Validation of skinfold equations and alternative methods for the determination of fat-free mass in young athletes.
青少年运动员皮褶厚度方程及无脂肪体重测定替代方法的验证
Front Sports Act Living. 2023 Aug 11;5:1240252. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2023.1240252. eCollection 2023.
4
Measurement of Energy Intake Using the Principle of Energy Balance Overcomes a Critical Limitation in the Assessment of Energy Availability.利用能量平衡原理测量能量摄入克服了能量可利用性评估中的一个关键限制。
Sports Med Open. 2023 Feb 22;9(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s40798-023-00558-8.
5
Concordance between Laboratory and Field Methods for the Assessment of Body Fat in Olympic Combat Athletes: Analysis of the Influence of Adiposity.实验室与现场方法评估奥运格斗运动员体脂的一致性:肥胖影响的分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 8;19(8):4493. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19084493.
6
Come Back Skinfolds, All Is Forgiven: A Narrative Review of the Efficacy of Common Body Composition Methods in Applied Sports Practice.回来吧皮褶厚度,既往不咎:常见身体成分测量方法在运动实践中应用的功效的叙述性综述。
Nutrients. 2021 Mar 25;13(4):1075. doi: 10.3390/nu13041075.
7
Gaelic Football Match-Play: Performance Attenuation and Timeline of Recovery.盖尔式足球比赛:表现衰减与恢复时间表
Sports (Basel). 2020 Dec 17;8(12):166. doi: 10.3390/sports8120166.
8
Estimation of Body Fat Percentage in Jockeys: Implications for a Weight Category Sport.赛马骑师体脂百分比的估计:对体重分级运动的影响
Int J Exerc Sci. 2020 May 1;13(4):511-525. doi: 10.70252/BVOJ4674. eCollection 2020.
9
Anthropometric Profile of Soccer Players as a Determinant of Position Specificity and Methodological Issues of Body Composition Estimation.足球运动员的人体测量学特征是位置特异性的决定因素和身体成分估计的方法学问题。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jul 5;16(13):2386. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16132386.
10
Effect of Ramadan Fasting on Weight and Body Composition in Healthy Non-Athlete Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.伊斯兰教斋戒月对健康非运动员成年人体重和身体成分的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Nutrients. 2019 Feb 24;11(2):478. doi: 10.3390/nu11020478.