Lindsell D R
Radiology Department, John Radcliffe Hospital, Headington, Oxford, UK.
Lancet. 1990 Feb 17;335(8686):390-3. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(90)90217-s.
Ultrasound and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) have been compared in the investigation of abnormalities of the pancreas and biliary tract. 208 patients undergoing ERCP were studied prospectively and all had an ultrasound examination in the 24 hours before ERCP. 15 patients had dilated bile-ducts for which no cause was seen on both ultrasound and ERCP; these patients were excluded. 120 of the remaining patients had an abnormal ERCP. In 101 ultrasound findings were in agreement (sensitivity 84%). 73 patients had a normal ERCP with ultrasound agreement in 70 (specificity 95%). The sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound is now such that patients can proceed directly to ERCP for diagnostic confirmation and papillotomy or endoprosthesis insertion where appropriate.
在胰腺和胆道异常的检查中,对超声检查和内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)进行了比较。对208例行ERCP的患者进行了前瞻性研究,所有患者在ERCP前24小时内均接受了超声检查。15例患者胆管扩张,但超声和ERCP均未发现病因,这些患者被排除在外。其余患者中有120例ERCP结果异常。其中101例超声检查结果与之相符(敏感性84%)。73例ERCP结果正常的患者中,70例超声检查结果与之相符(特异性95%)。目前超声检查的敏感性和特异性使得患者可以直接进行ERCP以进行诊断确认,并在适当情况下进行乳头切开术或内置假体植入。