Swobodnik W, Meyer W, Brecht-Kraus D, Wechsler J G, Geiger S, Malfertheiner P, Junge U, Ditschuneit H
Klin Wochenschr. 1983 Mar 15;61(6):291-6. doi: 10.1007/BF01497778.
From February to November 1981 the diagnostic relevance of ultrasound (US), computed tomography (CT) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) was compared prospectively in 75 patients with suspected pancreatic disease. Final diagnosis was confirmed by autopsy, surgery, clinical course, and further laboratory data. Thus it was possible to exclude pancreatic disorders in 32 patients. By ERCP we diagnosed all tumors; sensitivity was 100%. Sensitivity of US and CT were 63% each. In five cases US made the false positive diagnosis" pancreatic malignant tumor" (specificity 93%), CT and ERCP in two cases (specificity 97% each). In chronic pancreatitis specificity of US and ERCP were 100% and specificity of CT was 98%. Sensitivity of ERCP amounted to 93%, CT and US revealed 74% and 52%, respectively. We conclude that ERCP is the best morphologic diagnostic tool in differentiating chronic pancreatitis from pancreatic carcinoma. US is a good screening method and CT reveals good diagnostic results in acute pancreatitis.
1981年2月至11月,对75例疑似胰腺疾病患者前瞻性地比较了超声(US)、计算机断层扫描(CT)和内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)的诊断相关性。最终诊断通过尸检、手术、临床病程及进一步实验室数据得以证实。因此,32例患者被排除胰腺疾病。通过ERCP我们诊断出了所有肿瘤,敏感性为100%。US和CT的敏感性均为63%。US有5例假阳性诊断为“胰腺恶性肿瘤”(特异性93%),CT和ERCP各有2例假阳性诊断(特异性均为97%)。在慢性胰腺炎中,US和ERCP的特异性均为100%,CT的特异性为98%。ERCP的敏感性为93%,CT和US分别为74%和52%。我们得出结论,ERCP是鉴别慢性胰腺炎和胰腺癌的最佳形态学诊断工具。US是一种良好的筛查方法,CT在急性胰腺炎中显示出良好的诊断结果。