• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于单个项目在识别记忆和元认知中的作用:信号检测理论面临的挑战

On the role of individual items in recognition memory and metacognition: challenges for signal detection theory.

作者信息

Busey Thomas A, Arici Anne

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2009 Sep;35(5):1123-36. doi: 10.1037/a0016646.

DOI:10.1037/a0016646
PMID:19686009
Abstract

The authors tested the role of individual items in recognition memory using a forced-choice paradigm with face stimuli. They constructed distractor stimuli using morphing procedures that were similar to two parent faces and then compared a studied morph against an unstudied morph that was similar to two studied parents. The similarity of the parent faces was carefully balanced so that the choosing rates for the studied and unstudied morphs were approximately equal. Despite being equally likely to choose the studied and the unstudied morph, participants were systematically more confident when choosing the studied morph. This result is incompatible with Gaussian signal detection theory, even with unequal variances for targets and distractors. The authors propose an extension of an extant sampling model, SimSample, which provides a qualitative and quantitative account of the confidence and recognition dissociation. The results suggest that observers make contact with individual items when making recognition judgments with faces and that the structure of the sampling and decision process naturally leads to this dissociation of confidence and recognition.

摘要

作者使用带有面部刺激的强制选择范式测试了各个项目在识别记忆中的作用。他们使用与两张亲本面孔相似的变形程序构建了干扰刺激,然后将一个研究过的变形与一个未研究过的、与两个研究过的亲本相似的变形进行比较。亲本面孔的相似度经过仔细平衡,以便研究过的和未研究过的变形的选择率大致相等。尽管选择研究过的和未研究过的变形的可能性相同,但参与者在选择研究过的变形时系统地更有信心。这一结果与高斯信号检测理论不相容,即使目标和干扰物的方差不相等。作者提出了现有采样模型SimSample的扩展,该模型对信心和识别分离提供了定性和定量的解释。结果表明,观察者在对面孔进行识别判断时会接触到各个项目,并且采样和决策过程的结构自然会导致这种信心和识别的分离。

相似文献

1
On the role of individual items in recognition memory and metacognition: challenges for signal detection theory.关于单个项目在识别记忆和元认知中的作用:信号检测理论面临的挑战
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2009 Sep;35(5):1123-36. doi: 10.1037/a0016646.
2
Speeded old-new recognition of multidimensional perceptual stimuli: modeling performance at the individual-participant and individual-item levels.多维感知刺激的快速新旧识别:个体参与者和个体项目水平的建模表现
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2006 Apr;32(2):314-34. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.32.2.314.
3
The generation and resemblance heuristics in face recognition: cooperation and competition.人脸识别中的生成启发法和相似性启发法:合作与竞争。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2006 Mar;32(2):259-76. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.2.259.
4
Component structure of individual differences in true and false recognition of faces.面部真假识别中个体差异的成分结构。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2009 Sep;35(5):1207-30. doi: 10.1037/a0016368.
5
Angry faces are special too: evidence from the visual scanpath.愤怒的面孔也很特别:来自视觉扫描路径的证据。
Neuropsychology. 2009 Sep;23(5):658-67. doi: 10.1037/a0014518.
6
Test sequence priming in recognition memory.识别记忆中的测试序列启动。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2009 Sep;35(5):1162-74. doi: 10.1037/a0016372.
7
Separating mnemonic process from participant and item effects in the assessment of ROC asymmetries.在评估 ROC 不对称性时,将助记过程与参与者和项目效果分开。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2010 Jan;36(1):224-32. doi: 10.1037/a0017682.
8
The effects of perceptual history on memory of visual objects.感知历史对视觉对象记忆的影响。
Vision Res. 2007 Mar;47(7):965-73. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2007.01.003. Epub 2007 Feb 14.
9
My left brain and me: a dissociation in the perception of self and others.我与我的左脑:自我与他人认知中的分离
Neuropsychologia. 2004;42(9):1156-61. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.02.007.
10
Effects of conceptual processing on familiarity-based recognition.概念加工对基于熟悉度的识别的影响。
Can J Exp Psychol. 2010 Mar;64(1):67-76. doi: 10.1037/a0018375.

引用本文的文献

1
Confounding in Studies on Metacognition: A Preliminary Causal Analysis Framework.元认知研究中的混杂因素:一个初步的因果分析框架
Front Psychol. 2020 Aug 21;11:1933. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01933. eCollection 2020.
2
Where is the criterion noise in recognition? (Almost) everyplace you look: comment on Kellen, Klauer, and Singmann (2012).识别中的标准噪音在哪里?(几乎)在你看到的每一个地方:评论 Kellen、Klauer 和 Singmann(2012)。
Psychol Rev. 2013 Jul;120(3):720-6. doi: 10.1037/a0031911.
3
The neural basis of metacognitive ability.元认知能力的神经基础。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2012 May 19;367(1594):1338-49. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2011.0417.
4
Effects of loss aversion on post-decision wagering: implications for measures of awareness.损失规避对决策后押注的影响:对意识衡量指标的启示。
Conscious Cogn. 2010 Mar;19(1):352-63. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2009.11.002. Epub 2009 Dec 11.