Schubert Carla R, Cruickshanks Karen J, Murphy Claire, Huang Guan-Hua, Klein Barbara E K, Klein Ronald, Nieto F Javier, Pankow James S, Tweed Ted S
University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009 Jul;1170:531-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04102.x.
Olfactory function may be important for environmental and nutritional safety and enjoyment. Population-based epidemiological studies of olfaction are needed to understand the magnitude of the health burden, identify modifiable risk factors, and develop and test prevention and treatment strategies for olfactory impairment. However, measuring olfaction in large studies is challenging, requiring repeatable, efficient methods that can measure change over time. Two large cohort studies, the Epidemiology of Hearing Loss Study (EHLS) and the Beaver Dam Offspring Study (BOSS), included olfactory testing. In both studies, the San Diego Odor Identification Test (SDOIT) was used to measure olfaction. Subjects were asked to identify eight common household odors (such as coffee and chocolate). Olfactory impairment was defined as correctly identifying fewer than six out of eight odorants after two trials. The EHLS participants were age 53-95 years at the time of the first measurement (1998-2000), and participants in the BOSS were age 21-84 years. The prevalence of olfactory impairment in the EHLS was 25% overall, more common in men than women, and increased with age. Five years later olfaction was measured a second time and the majority (84%) of the EHLS participants were classified the same. Among those with impairment at the base line nearly one-third (31%) improved to unimpaired. This heterogeneity in olfactory impairment has unique implications for data analyses and predicting outcomes and associations. Preliminary data from the BOSS suggest the prevalence of olfactory impairment may be lower in younger generations. All these factors point to a continuing need for epidemiological studies of olfaction.
嗅觉功能对于环境、营养安全及享受而言可能至关重要。需要开展基于人群的嗅觉流行病学研究,以了解健康负担的程度、识别可改变的风险因素,并制定和测试嗅觉障碍的预防及治疗策略。然而,在大型研究中测量嗅觉具有挑战性,需要可重复、高效且能测量随时间变化的方法。两项大型队列研究,即听力损失流行病学研究(EHLS)和比弗代尔后代研究(BOSS),纳入了嗅觉测试。在这两项研究中,均使用圣地亚哥气味识别测试(SDOIT)来测量嗅觉。受试者被要求识别八种常见的家庭气味(如咖啡和巧克力)。嗅觉障碍的定义为在两次测试后正确识别出的八种气味剂少于六种。EHLS的参与者在首次测量时(1998 - 2000年)年龄为53 - 95岁,BOSS的参与者年龄为21 - 84岁。EHLS中嗅觉障碍的总体患病率为25%,在男性中比女性更常见,且随年龄增加而上升。五年后对嗅觉进行了第二次测量,EHLS的大多数参与者(84%)分类相同。在基线时存在障碍的参与者中,近三分之一(31%)改善为无障碍。嗅觉障碍的这种异质性对数据分析以及预测结果和关联具有独特的意义。BOSS的初步数据表明,年轻一代中嗅觉障碍的患病率可能较低。所有这些因素都表明持续开展嗅觉流行病学研究的必要性。