Children's Medical Ventures, Norwell, Massachusetts, USA.
J Adv Nurs. 2009 Oct;65(10):2239-48. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2009.05052.x.
This paper is a discussion of evidence-based core measures for developmental care in neonatal intensive care units.
Inconsistent definition, application and evaluation of developmental care have resulted in criticism of its scientific merit. The key concept guiding data organization in this paper is the United States of America's Joint Commission's concept of 'core measures' for evaluating and accrediting healthcare organizations. This concept is applied to five disease- and procedure-independent measures based on the Universe of Developmental Care model.
Electronically accessible, peer reviewed studies on developmental care published in English were culled for data supporting the selected objective core measures between 1978 and 2008. The quality of evidence was based on a structured predetermined format that included three independent reviewers. Systematic reviews and randomized control trials were considered the strongest level of evidence. When unavailable, cohort, case control, consensus statements and qualitative methods were considered the strongest level of evidence for a particular clinical issue.
Five core measure sets for evidence-based developmental care were evaluated: (1) protected sleep, (2) pain and stress assessment and management, (3) developmental activities of daily living, (4) family-centred care, and (5) the healing environment. These five categories reflect recurring themes that emerged from the literature review regarding developmentally supportive care and quality caring practices in neonatal populations. This practice model provides clear metrics for nursing actions having an impact on the hospital experience of infant-family dyads.
Standardized disease-independent core measures for developmental care establish minimum evidence-based practice expectations and offer an objective basis for cross-institutional comparison of developmental care programmes.
本文讨论了新生儿重症监护病房发展护理的循证核心措施。
发展护理的定义、应用和评估不一致,导致其科学价值受到批评。本文组织数据的关键概念是美国联合委员会(Joint Commission)用于评估和认证医疗机构的“核心措施”概念。该概念适用于基于发展护理宇宙模型的五个与疾病和程序无关的措施。
从 1978 年至 2008 年,以英文发表的关于发展护理的可在线获取的同行评审研究,均被筛选以获取支持选定的客观核心措施的数据。证据质量基于包括三名独立评审员的结构化预定格式。系统评价和随机对照试验被认为是最强的证据级别。当没有可用的证据时,队列研究、病例对照研究、共识声明和定性方法被认为是特定临床问题的最强证据级别。
评估了五个基于证据的发展护理核心措施集:(1)保护睡眠,(2)疼痛和压力评估与管理,(3)日常生活的发展活动,(4)以家庭为中心的护理,以及(5)康复环境。这五个类别反映了文献综述中关于新生儿群体发展支持护理和优质护理实践的反复出现的主题。该实践模式为对婴儿-家庭对子的医院体验产生影响的护理行为提供了明确的衡量标准。
发展护理的标准化与疾病无关的核心措施确立了最低限度的循证实践期望,并为发展护理计划的机构间比较提供了客观基础。