Suppr超能文献

结构化决策作为一种概念框架,用于确定保护和管理的阈值。

Structured decision making as a conceptual framework to identify thresholds for conservation and management.

作者信息

Martin Julien, Runge Michael C, Nichols James D, Lubow Bruce C, Kendall William L

机构信息

Florida Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611-0485, USA.

出版信息

Ecol Appl. 2009 Jul;19(5):1079-90. doi: 10.1890/08-0255.1.

Abstract

Thresholds and their relevance to conservation have become a major topic of discussion in the ecological literature. Unfortunately, in many cases the lack of a clear conceptual framework for thinking about thresholds may have led to confusion in attempts to apply the concept of thresholds to conservation decisions. Here, we advocate a framework for thinking about thresholds in terms of a structured decision making process. The purpose of this framework is to promote a logical and transparent process for making informed decisions for conservation. Specification of such a framework leads naturally to consideration of definitions and roles of different kinds of thresholds in the process. We distinguish among three categories of thresholds. Ecological thresholds are values of system state variables at which small changes bring about substantial changes in system dynamics. Utility thresholds are components of management objectives (determined by human values) and are values of state or performance variables at which small changes yield substantial changes in the value of the management outcome. Decision thresholds are values of system state variables at which small changes prompt changes in management actions in order to reach specified management objectives. The approach that we present focuses directly on the objectives of management, with an aim to providing decisions that are optimal with respect to those objectives. This approach clearly distinguishes the components of the decision process that are inherently subjective (management objectives, potential management actions) from those that are more objective (system models, estimates of system state). Optimization based on these components then leads to decision matrices specifying optimal actions to be taken at various values of system state variables. Values of state variables separating different actions in such matrices are viewed as decision thresholds. Utility thresholds are included in the objectives component, and ecological thresholds may be embedded in models projecting consequences of management actions. Decision thresholds are determined by the above-listed components of a structured decision process. These components may themselves vary over time, inducing variation in the decision thresholds inherited from them. These dynamic decision thresholds can then be determined using adaptive management. We provide numerical examples (that are based on patch occupancy models) of structured decision processes that include all three kinds of thresholds.

摘要

阈值及其与保护的相关性已成为生态文献中的一个主要讨论话题。不幸的是,在许多情况下,由于缺乏一个清晰的思考阈值的概念框架,在试图将阈值概念应用于保护决策时可能导致了混乱。在此,我们倡导一个基于结构化决策过程来思考阈值的框架。这个框架的目的是促进一个逻辑清晰且透明的过程,以便为保护做出明智的决策。这样一个框架的具体说明自然会引发对过程中不同类型阈值的定义和作用的思考。我们区分出三类阈值。生态阈值是系统状态变量的值,在这些值处,微小变化会导致系统动态的显著变化。效用阈值是管理目标的组成部分(由人类价值观决定),是状态或绩效变量的值,在这些值处,微小变化会使管理结果的价值产生显著变化。决策阈值是系统状态变量的值,在这些值处,微小变化会促使管理行动发生改变,以实现特定的管理目标。我们提出的方法直接关注管理目标,旨在提供相对于这些目标而言最优的决策。这种方法清楚地区分了决策过程中本质上主观的部分(管理目标、潜在管理行动)和更客观的部分(系统模型、系统状态估计)。基于这些组成部分进行优化,然后会得到决策矩阵,该矩阵规定了在系统状态变量的各种值下应采取的最优行动。在这样的矩阵中区分不同行动的状态变量值被视为决策阈值。效用阈值包含在目标部分,生态阈值可能嵌入在预测管理行动后果的模型中。决策阈值由结构化决策过程的上述组成部分决定。这些组成部分本身可能随时间变化,从而导致从中继承的决策阈值发生变化。然后可以使用适应性管理来确定这些动态决策阈值。我们提供了基于斑块占据模型的结构化决策过程的数值示例,其中包括所有三种类型的阈值。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验