• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床特征和实验室检查单项及联合诊断急性阑尾炎的价值。

Single and combined diagnostic value of clinical features and laboratory tests in acute appendicitis.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Acad Emerg Med. 2009 Sep;16(9):835-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00486.x. Epub 2009 Aug 18.

DOI:10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00486.x
PMID:19689484
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The objective was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of clinical features and laboratory test results in detecting acute appendicitis.

METHODS

Clinical features and laboratory test results were prospectively recorded in a consecutive series of 1,101 patients presenting with abdominal pain at the emergency department (ED) in six hospitals. Likelihood ratios (LRs) and the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were calculated for the individual features. Variants of clinical presentation, based on different combinations of clinical features, were investigated and the accuracies of combinations of clinical features were evaluated.

RESULTS

The discriminative power (AUC) of the individual features in patients with suspected appendicitis ranged from 0.50 to 0.65. For five of the 23 predictor sets, the accuracy for appendicitis was more than 85%. This accuracy was only found in male patients. The relative frequency of these predictor sets ranged from 2% to 13% of patients with suspected appendicitis. A combination of the clinical features migration of pain to the right lower quadrant (RLQ), and direct tenderness in the RLQ, was present in only 28% (120/422) of clinically suspected patients, of whom no more than 85 patients had appendicitis (71%). A "classical" presentation (combination of migration of pain to the RLQ, tenderness in the RLQ, and rigidity) occurred in only 6% (25/422) of patients with suspected appendicitis and yielded an accuracy of 100% in males but only 46% in females.

CONCLUSIONS

The discriminative power (AUC) of individual clinical features and laboratory test results for appendicitis was weak in patients with suspected appendicitis. Combinations of clinical features and laboratory tests with high diagnostic accuracy are relatively infrequent in patients with suspected appendicitis.

摘要

目的

评估临床特征和实验室检查结果在诊断急性阑尾炎中的准确性。

方法

在六家医院的急诊科连续收治的 1101 例腹痛患者中,前瞻性地记录了临床特征和实验室检查结果。计算了各个特征的似然比(LR)和受试者工作特征曲线下的面积(AUC)。研究了基于不同临床特征组合的不同临床表现变体,并评估了临床特征组合的准确性。

结果

在疑似阑尾炎患者中,单个特征的鉴别能力(AUC)范围为 0.50 至 0.65。在 23 个预测因子组中的 5 个中,阑尾炎的准确率超过 85%。这种准确性仅在男性患者中发现。这些预测因子组的相对频率在疑似阑尾炎患者中范围为 2%至 13%。疼痛向右下象限(RLQ)转移和 RLQ 直接压痛的临床特征组合仅在 422 例疑似临床患者中的 28%(120/422)中出现,其中不超过 85 例患者患有阑尾炎(71%)。“经典”表现(疼痛向 RLQ 转移、RLQ 压痛和强直的组合)仅在疑似阑尾炎患者中的 6%(25/422)中发生,其在男性中的准确率为 100%,但在女性中仅为 46%。

结论

在疑似阑尾炎患者中,单个临床特征和实验室检查结果对阑尾炎的鉴别能力(AUC)较弱。在疑似阑尾炎患者中,具有较高诊断准确性的临床特征和实验室检查组合相对较少。

相似文献

1
Single and combined diagnostic value of clinical features and laboratory tests in acute appendicitis.临床特征和实验室检查单项及联合诊断急性阑尾炎的价值。
Acad Emerg Med. 2009 Sep;16(9):835-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00486.x. Epub 2009 Aug 18.
2
Additional value of biochemical tests in suspected acute appendicitis.生化检查在疑似急性阑尾炎中的附加价值。
Eur J Surg. 1997 Jul;163(7):533-8.
3
[Evaluation of diagnostic scales for appendicitis in patients with lower abdominal pain].[下腹部疼痛患者阑尾炎诊断量表的评估]
Biomedica. 2007 Sep;27(3):419-28.
4
[Acute appendicitis in children: is there an histo-clinical correlation?].[儿童急性阑尾炎:组织学与临床之间存在关联吗?]
Arch Pediatr. 2005 Feb;12(2):234-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arcped.2004.01.003.
5
Diagnostic accuracy of inflammatory markers in patients operated on for suspected acute appendicitis: a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.疑似急性阑尾炎手术患者炎症标志物的诊断准确性:受试者工作特征曲线分析
Eur J Surg. 1999 Jul;165(7):679-85. doi: 10.1080/11024159950189744.
6
Meta-analysis of the clinical and laboratory diagnosis of appendicitis.阑尾炎临床与实验室诊断的荟萃分析。
Br J Surg. 2004 Jan;91(1):28-37. doi: 10.1002/bjs.4464.
7
The use of white blood cell count and left shift in the diagnosis of appendicitis in children.白细胞计数及核左移在儿童阑尾炎诊断中的应用。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2007 Feb;23(2):69-76. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e31802d1716.
8
Interleukin-6 and lipopolysaccharide-binding protein in acute appendicitis in children.儿童急性阑尾炎中的白细胞介素-6和脂多糖结合蛋白
Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2007;67(2):197-206. doi: 10.1080/00365510601010397.
9
Pitfalls in appendicitis.阑尾炎的陷阱
Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2010 Feb;28(1):103-18, viii. doi: 10.1016/j.emc.2009.09.003.
10
[Prospective evaluation of admission for acute abdominal pain in children].[儿童急性腹痛入院的前瞻性评估]
Pediatrie. 1989;44(6):481-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Signs and symptoms of serious illness in adults with acute abdominal pain presenting to ambulatory care: a systematic review.成人急性腹痛患者在门诊就诊时严重疾病的体征和症状:一项系统评价
BJGP Open. 2024 Oct 29;8(3). doi: 10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0245. Print 2024 Oct.
2
Typical and Atypical Presentations of Appendicitis and Their Implications for Diagnosis and Treatment: A Literature Review.阑尾炎的典型与非典型表现及其对诊断和治疗的意义:文献综述
Cureus. 2023 Apr 2;15(4):e37024. doi: 10.7759/cureus.37024. eCollection 2023 Apr.
3
Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography in adults with suspected acute appendicitis at the emergency department in a private tertiary hospital in Tanzania.
坦桑尼亚一家私立三级医院急诊科成人疑似急性阑尾炎的计算机断层扫描诊断准确性。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 27;17(10):e0276720. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276720. eCollection 2022.
4
Can peritoneal thickening and enhancement be used to determine perforation in patients with acute appendicitis?腹膜增厚和强化能否用于判断急性阑尾炎患者是否穿孔?
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2022 Apr;28(4):428-433. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2020.58991.
5
Leucocyte count and C-reactive protein cannot be relied upon in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in HIV-infected patients.白细胞计数和 C 反应蛋白不能依赖于诊断 HIV 感染患者的急性阑尾炎。
BJS Open. 2021 Jan 8;5(1). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zraa016.
6
Computed tomography for diagnosis of acute appendicitis in adults.成人急性阑尾炎诊断的计算机断层扫描
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Nov 19;2019(11):CD009977. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009977.pub2.
7
Added value of graded compression ultrasound to the Alvarado score in cases of right iliac fossa pain.在右下腹疼痛病例中,分级加压超声对阿尔瓦拉多评分的附加值。
Afr J Emerg Med. 2016 Sep;6(3):138-143. doi: 10.1016/j.afjem.2016.02.004. Epub 2016 Apr 7.
8
The diagnostic accuracy of clinical and laboratory parameters in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in the adult emergency department population - a case control pilot study.临床和实验室参数对成人急诊人群中急性阑尾炎的诊断准确性 - 一项病例对照的初步研究。
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2018 Oct 15;28(3):030712. doi: 10.11613/BM.2018.030712.
9
Obstructive Uropathy Secondary to Missed Acute Appendicitis.漏诊急性阑尾炎继发梗阻性尿路病
Case Rep Surg. 2016;2016:4641974. doi: 10.1155/2016/4641974. Epub 2016 Oct 12.
10
Biomarkers of acute appendicitis: systematic review and cost-benefit trade-off analysis.急性阑尾炎的生物标志物:系统评价与成本效益权衡分析
Surg Endosc. 2017 Mar;31(3):1022-1031. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5109-1. Epub 2016 Aug 5.