Partners In Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Hum Resour Health. 2009 Aug 20;7:75. doi: 10.1186/1478-4491-7-75.
The scarcity of physicians in sub-Saharan Africa - particularly in rural clinics staffed only by non-physician health workers - is constraining access to HIV treatment, as only they are legally allowed to start antiretroviral therapy in the HIV-positive patient. Here we present a pilot study from Uganda assessing agreement between non-physician clinicians (nurses and clinical officers) and physicians in their decisions as to whether to start therapy.
We conducted the study at 12 government antiretroviral therapy sites in three regions of Uganda, all of which had staff trained in delivery of antiretroviral therapy using the WHO Integrated Management of Adult and Adolescent Illness guidelines for chronic HIV care. We collected seven key variables to measure patient assessment and the decision as to whether to start antiretroviral therapy, the primary variable of interest being the Final Antiretroviral Therapy Recommendation. Patients saw either a clinical officer or nurse first, and then were screened identically by a blinded physician during the same clinic visit. We measured inter-rater agreement between the decisions of the non-physician health workers and physicians in the antiretroviral therapy assessment variables using simple and weighted Kappa analysis.
Two hundred fifty-four patients were seen by a nurse and physician, while 267 were seen by a clinical officer and physician. The majority (>50%) in each arm of the study were in World Health Organization Clinical Stages I and II and therefore not currently eligible for antiretroviral therapy according to national antiretroviral therapy guidelines. Nurses and clinical officers both showed moderate to almost perfect agreement with physicians in their Final Antiretroviral Therapy Recommendation (unweighted kappa=0.59 and kappa=0.91, respectively). Agreement was also substantial for nurses versus physicians for assigning World Health Organization Clinical Stage (weighted kappa=0.65), but moderate for clinical officers versus physicians (kappa=0.44).
Both nurses and clinical officers demonstrated strong agreement with physicians in deciding whether to initiate antiretroviral therapy in the HIV patient. This could lead to immediate benefits with respect to antiretroviral therapy scale-up and decentralization to rural areas in Uganda, as non-physician clinicians--particularly clinical officers--demonstrated the capacity to make correct clinical decisions to start antiretroviral therapy. These preliminary data warrant more detailed and multicountry investigation into decision-making of non-physician clinicians in the management of HIV disease with antiretroviral therapy, and should lead policy-makers to more carefully explore task-shifting as a shorter-term response to addressing the human resource crisis in HIV care and treatment.
撒哈拉以南非洲地区医生短缺 - 特别是在只有非医师卫生工作者的农村诊所 - 限制了艾滋病毒治疗的可及性,因为只有他们才被法律允许在艾滋病毒阳性患者中开始抗逆转录病毒治疗。在这里,我们介绍了一项来自乌干达的试点研究,评估了非医师临床医生(护士和临床医生)与医生在决定是否开始治疗方面的决策是否一致。
我们在乌干达三个地区的 12 个政府抗逆转录病毒治疗点进行了这项研究,这些点都有接受过使用世卫组织成人和青少年艾滋病毒慢性病综合管理指南提供抗逆转录病毒治疗培训的工作人员。我们收集了七个关键变量来衡量患者评估以及开始抗逆转录病毒治疗的决策,主要关注的变量是最终抗逆转录病毒治疗建议。患者首先由临床医生或护士就诊,然后在同一就诊期间由盲法医生进行相同的筛查。我们使用简单和加权 Kappa 分析来衡量非医师卫生工作者和医生在抗逆转录病毒治疗评估变量中的决策之间的评分者间一致性。
254 名患者由护士和医生就诊,而 267 名患者由临床医生和医生就诊。研究中每个手臂的大多数 (>50%) 患者处于世卫组织临床阶段 I 和 II,因此根据国家抗逆转录病毒治疗指南目前不符合抗逆转录病毒治疗的条件。护士和临床医生在最终抗逆转录病毒治疗建议方面与医生的一致性均为中度至几乎完全一致(未加权 Kappa=0.59 和 Kappa=0.91)。护士与医生之间对世卫组织临床阶段的分配也具有实质性一致性(加权 Kappa=0.65),但临床医生与医生之间为中度一致性(Kappa=0.44)。
护士和临床医生在决定是否开始对艾滋病毒患者进行抗逆转录病毒治疗方面均与医生表现出高度一致。这可能会立即带来益处,因为抗逆转录病毒治疗在乌干达的扩大和向农村地区的转移,因为非医师临床医生 - 特别是临床医生 - 有能力做出正确的临床决策开始抗逆转录病毒治疗。这些初步数据值得更详细和多国调查非医师临床医生在管理艾滋病毒疾病和抗逆转录病毒治疗方面的决策,应该促使决策者更仔细地探索任务转移,作为解决艾滋病毒护理和治疗人力资源危机的短期应对措施。