Giaffer M H, North G, Holdsworth C D
Gastroenterology Unit, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield.
Lancet. 1990 Apr 7;335(8693):816-9. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(90)90936-y.
30 patients with active Crohn's disease, mean Crohn's Disease Activity Index 301 (SE 32), who would otherwise have been treated with steroids, were randomised to receive for 4 weeks either an elemental diet ('Vivonex') (n = 16) or a polymeric diet ('Fortison') (n = 14). Assessment on days 10 and 28 showed that clinical remission occurred in 5 (36%) of the 14 patients on fortison compared with 12 (75%) of the 16 patients assigned to vivonex. The difference in remission rate was significant (p less than 0.03). Dietary treatment resulted in little change in the nutritional state and various laboratory indices of activity over a 4 week period despite clinical improvement. Polymeric diets do not seem to offer an effective therapeutic alternative to elemental diets in patients with acute exacerbations of Crohn's disease.
30例活动期克罗恩病患者,克罗恩病活动指数平均为301(标准误32),这些患者原本需接受类固醇治疗,他们被随机分为两组,一组接受要素饮食(“Vivonex”)(n = 16),另一组接受聚合饮食(“Fortison”)(n = 14),为期4周。在第10天和第28天的评估显示,接受Fortison治疗的14例患者中有5例(36%)实现临床缓解,而分配到Vivonex的16例患者中有12例(75%)实现临床缓解。缓解率差异具有显著性(p小于0.03)。尽管临床症状有所改善,但在4周期间,饮食治疗对营养状况和各种活动实验室指标的影响很小。在克罗恩病急性加重期患者中,聚合饮食似乎并不能作为要素饮食的有效治疗替代方案。