• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[2003年西班牙64岁以上人群的正式和非正式家庭护理分布情况]

[Distribution of formal and informal home care for people older than 64 years in Spain 2003].

作者信息

Rogero-García Jesús

机构信息

Instituto de Economía, Geografía y Demografía (IEGD), Centro de Ciencias Humanas y Sociales (CCHS), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC).

出版信息

Rev Esp Salud Publica. 2009 May-Jun;83(3):393-405. doi: 10.1590/s1135-57272009000300005.

DOI:10.1590/s1135-57272009000300005
PMID:19701571
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There has been a relative lack of research examing the distribution of care to elderly dependent people in Spain. The aim of this paper is to analyse how formal and informal care is provided to elderly dependent people in Spain and to assess the socio-economic conditions in which the different kinds of care emerge.

METHODS

This study is based on a sample of the elderly dependent population selected from those who reported the need of care in the 2003 Spanish Health Survey. The distribution of care among older people was cross-tabulated to identify the type of care, while regression models were used to identify the socio-economic characteristics of people receiving formal and/or informal care.

RESULTS

Around 7.5% of the elderly people who need care do not receive it. Among those who do receive it, 89.4% receive informal care, 14.8% private care and 8.1% public care. 11.9% of elderly people in the study receive a mix of formal an informal care. Elderly people living in households in which the monthly income exceeds EUR 900 are five times more likely than people living in households in which the monthly income is less than EUR 600 to receive private care instead of public care. People older than 84 years are six times more likely to receive public care than people aged between 65 and 74.

CONCLUSIONS

Men are two times more likely than women to receive exclusively informal care. Women are three times more likely than men to receive both kinds of care simultaneously. Formal care complements informal care. Private care is more common than public care. Men, people living in larger-sized households, and people with fewer socio-economic resources are more likely to receive informal care.

摘要

背景

西班牙在研究老年受扶养人群护理分配方面相对缺乏研究。本文旨在分析西班牙如何为老年受扶养人群提供正式和非正式护理,并评估不同类型护理出现的社会经济条件。

方法

本研究基于从2003年西班牙健康调查中报告需要护理的人群中选取的老年受扶养人群样本。对老年人的护理分配进行交叉制表以确定护理类型,同时使用回归模型确定接受正式和/或非正式护理的人群的社会经济特征。

结果

约7.5%需要护理的老年人未得到护理。在得到护理的人群中,89.4%接受非正式护理,14.8%接受私人护理,8.1%接受公共护理。研究中的11.9%老年人同时接受正式和非正式护理。月收入超过900欧元家庭中的老年人接受私人护理而非公共护理的可能性是月收入低于600欧元家庭中老年人的五倍。84岁以上的老年人接受公共护理的可能性是65至74岁老年人的六倍。

结论

男性仅接受非正式护理的可能性是女性的两倍。女性同时接受两种护理的可能性是男性的三倍。正式护理补充非正式护理。私人护理比公共护理更常见。男性、居住在大家庭中的人以及社会经济资源较少的人更有可能接受非正式护理。

相似文献

1
[Distribution of formal and informal home care for people older than 64 years in Spain 2003].[2003年西班牙64岁以上人群的正式和非正式家庭护理分布情况]
Rev Esp Salud Publica. 2009 May-Jun;83(3):393-405. doi: 10.1590/s1135-57272009000300005.
2
Functional ability and health complaints among older people with a combination of public and informal care vs. public care only.接受公共护理与非正式护理相结合的老年人与仅接受公共护理的老年人的功能能力和健康问题。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2008 Mar;22(1):136-48. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2007.00549.x.
3
Gender disparities in the receipt of home care for elderly people with disability in the United States.美国残疾老年人接受家庭护理方面的性别差异。
JAMA. 2000 Dec 20;284(23):3022-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.284.23.3022.
4
Use of informal and formal care among community dwelling dependent elderly in Spain.西班牙社区居住的依赖他人照顾的老年人对非正式和正式照料的使用情况。
Eur J Public Health. 2014 Aug;24(4):668-73. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckt088. Epub 2013 Jun 27.
5
Informal and formal care of older people in Iceland.冰岛老年人的非正式和正式照料
Scand J Caring Sci. 2014 Dec;28(4):802-11. doi: 10.1111/scs.12114. Epub 2014 Feb 5.
6
[Changes in the quality of life of older people living at home: does type of care play a role?].居家老年人生活质量的变化:护理类型起作用吗?
Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr. 2011 Sep;42(4):170-83. doi: 10.1007/s12439-011-0031-4.
7
Direct and indirect costs and resource use in dementia care: A cross-sectional study in patients living at home.痴呆症护理中的直接和间接成本及资源使用:一项针对居家患者的横断面研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2016 Mar;55:39-49. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2015.10.012. Epub 2015 Nov 19.
8
Changes over a decade in end-of-life care and transfers during the last 3 months of life: a repeated survey among proxies of deceased older people.十余年来临终关怀和生命最后 3 个月内转院的变化:对已故老年人的代理人进行的重复调查。
Palliat Med. 2013 Jun;27(6):544-52. doi: 10.1177/0269216312457212. Epub 2012 Sep 17.
9
Frailty differences in older adults' use of informal and formal care.老年人对非正式和正式护理的使用存在脆弱性差异。
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2018 Nov-Dec;79:69-77. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2018.05.018. Epub 2018 Jun 2.
10
Analysing the importance of older people's resources for the use of home care in a cash-for-care scheme: evidence from Vienna.分析老年人资源在现金换护理计划中对居家护理使用的重要性:来自维也纳的证据。
Health Soc Care Community. 2017 Mar;25(2):514-526. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12334. Epub 2016 Feb 25.

引用本文的文献

1
A Sex- and Gender-Based Approach to Chronic Conditions in Central Catalonia (Spain): A Descriptive Cross-Sectional Study.西班牙加泰罗尼亚中部地区慢性疾病的性别与性别差异方法:一项描述性的横断面研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Jan 29;21(2):152. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21020152.
2
The Association of Caregivers' Socio-Economic Conditions with Family Caregiving Norms: Evidence from China.照顾者的社会经济状况与家庭照顾规范的关联:来自中国的证据
Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Apr 26;13(5):362. doi: 10.3390/bs13050362.
3
Quality of Life in Caregivers of Cancer Patients: A Literature Review.
癌症患者照顾者的生活质量:文献综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 15;20(2):1570. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20021570.
4
Health-related quality of life in caregivers of community-dwelling individuals with disabilities or chronic conditions. A gender-differentiated analysis in a cross-sectional study.社区居住的残疾或慢性病患者照料者的健康相关生活质量。一项横断面研究中的性别差异分析。
BMC Nurs. 2022 Mar 29;21(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s12912-022-00845-x.
5
Sociodemographic and health factors associated with the risk of financial catastrophe when informal care for patients with haematological neoplasms is replaced by formal care.当血液肿瘤患者的非正式护理被正式护理取代时,与经济灾难风险相关的社会人口学和健康因素。
Health Econ Rev. 2022 Mar 9;12(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s13561-022-00364-0.
6
Development and psychometric testing of the Spanish version of the Caregiver Preparedness Scale.《照顾者准备量表》西班牙语版本的编制与心理测量学测试
Nurs Open. 2021 May;8(3):1183-1193. doi: 10.1002/nop2.732. Epub 2020 Dec 19.
7
Shadow and extended shadow cost sharing associated to informal long-term care: the case of Spain.与非正式长期护理相关的影子成本和扩展影子成本分担:以西班牙为例。
Health Econ Rev. 2020 May 19;10(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s13561-020-00272-1.
8
Gender Differences in Social Support Received by Informal Caregivers: A Personal Network Analysis Approach.《非正式照护者所获得的社会支持中的性别差异:一种个人网络分析方法》。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Dec 31;16(1):91. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16010091.
9
Catastrophic financial effect of replacing informal care with formal care: a study based on haematological neoplasms.用正规护理取代非正规护理的灾难性财务影响:一项基于血液系统肿瘤的研究。
Eur J Health Econ. 2019 Mar;20(2):303-316. doi: 10.1007/s10198-018-0998-7. Epub 2018 Aug 18.
10
Paid and unpaid support received by co-resident informal caregivers attending to community-dwelling older adults in Spain.在西班牙,照顾社区居住老年人的同住非正式照料者所获得的有偿和无偿支持。
Eur J Ageing. 2011 Apr 6;8(2):95. doi: 10.1007/s10433-011-0184-6. eCollection 2011 Jun.