Akpanudo Sutoidem M, Price James H, Jordan Timothy, Khuder Sadik, Price Joy A
Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services, College of Health Science and Human Service, The University of Toledo, Toledo, OH 43606, USA.
J Community Health. 2009 Dec;34(6):461-71. doi: 10.1007/s10900-009-9178-0.
A random sample of clinical psychologists was surveyed regarding their smoking cessation practices and perceptions. A total of 352 psychologists responded (57%) to the valid and reliable questionnaire. The majority (59.1%) of psychologists did not always identify and document the smoking status of patients. The majority reported high efficacy expectations (66.4%) and low outcome expectations (55.1%) for using the 5A's smoking cessation counseling technique. Counselors that had never smoked were almost two times more likely to have higher efficacy expectations than those that were current smokers or ex-smokers (OR = 1.94, 95% CI 1.18-3.12). The factors that predicted regular use of the 5A's included the number of identified barriers, psychologists' level of self efficacy, and the urbanicity of one's practice location.
我们对一组随机抽取的临床心理学家进行了调查,了解他们的戒烟实践和看法。共有352名心理学家(57%)对有效且可靠的问卷做出了回应。大多数心理学家(59.1%)并非总是确定并记录患者的吸烟状况。大多数人报告称,对于使用“5A戒烟咨询技术”,他们的效能期望较高(66.4%),而结果期望较低(55.1%)。从未吸烟的咨询师对该技术有较高效能期望的可能性几乎是当前吸烟者或曾经吸烟者的两倍(比值比=1.94,95%置信区间1.18 - 3.12)。预测“5A戒烟咨询技术”能否得到经常使用的因素包括所识别出的障碍数量、心理学家的自我效能水平以及其执业地点的城市化程度。