• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The safety of home birth: is the evidence good enough?家庭分娩的安全性：证据是否充分？
CMAJ. 2009 Sep 15;181(6-7):359-60. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.091240. Epub 2009 Aug 31.
2
Association between birth attendant type and delivery site and perinatal outcomes.分娩辅助人员类型和分娩地点与围产儿结局的关系。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2019 May;145(2):187-192. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12786. Epub 2019 Mar 8.
3
Perinatal mortality and morbidity up to 28 days after birth among 743 070 low-risk planned home and hospital births: a cohort study based on three merged national perinatal databases.743070例低风险计划在家分娩和医院分娩的围产期死亡率及出生后28天内的发病率：一项基于三个合并的国家围产期数据库的队列研究
BJOG. 2015 Apr;122(5):720-8. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13084. Epub 2014 Sep 10.
4
[Ethnic differences in preference for home delivery and in pregnancy care received by pregnant women].[孕妇对家庭分娩的偏好及所接受孕期护理的种族差异]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2008 Nov 15;152(46):2514-8.
5
[Study in the Netherlands. How safe are home deliveries?].[荷兰的研究。家庭分娩有多安全？]
MMW Fortschr Med. 2014 Nov 13;156 Spec no 2:29.
6
Home versus hospital birth--process and outcome.家庭分娩与医院分娩——过程与结果。
Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2010 Feb;65(2):132-40. doi: 10.1097/OGX.0b013e3181d0fe5d.
7
The Canadian Birth Place Study: describing maternity practice and providers' exposure to home birth.加拿大出生地点研究：描述产妇实践和提供者在家分娩的暴露情况。
Midwifery. 2012 Oct;28(5):600-8. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2012.06.011. Epub 2012 Aug 25.
8
Outcome of planned home and planned hospital births in low risk pregnancies: prospective study in midwifery practices in The Netherlands.低风险妊娠中计划在家分娩与计划在医院分娩的结局：荷兰助产实践的前瞻性研究
BMJ. 1996 Nov 23;313(7068):1309-13. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7068.1309.
9
Examining autonomy's boundaries: a follow-up review of perinatal mortality cases in UK independent midwifery.审视自主性的边界：英国独立助产士围产儿死亡案例的后续审查。
Birth. 2010 Dec;37(4):280-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2010.00422.x.
10
Place of delivery and adverse outcomes.分娩地点与不良结局
BMJ. 2010 Nov 2;341:c5560. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c5560.

引用本文的文献

1
Interpreting evidence: why values can matter as much as science.解读证据：为何价值观与科学同样重要。
Perspect Biol Med. 2012 Winter;55(1):59-70. doi: 10.1353/pbm.2012.0007.

本文引用的文献

1
Outcomes of planned home birth with registered midwife versus planned hospital birth with midwife or physician.由注册助产士接生的计划在家分娩与由助产士或医生接生的计划在医院分娩的结局比较。
CMAJ. 2009 Sep 15;181(6-7):377-83. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.081869. Epub 2009 Aug 31.
2
Perinatal mortality and morbidity in a nationwide cohort of 529,688 low-risk planned home and hospital births.在一个包含529,688例低风险计划在家分娩和医院分娩的全国性队列中的围产期死亡率和发病率。
BJOG. 2009 Aug;116(9):1177-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02175.x.
3
Estimating intrapartum-related perinatal mortality rates for booked home births: when the 'best' available data are not good enough.估算预约在家分娩的产时相关围产期死亡率：当现有的“最佳”数据仍不够完善时。
BJOG. 2009 Jun;116(7):933-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02147.x.
4
Why women do not accept randomisation for place of birth: feasibility of a RCT in The Netherlands.为何女性不接受随机分配出生地：荷兰一项随机对照试验的可行性
BJOG. 2009 Mar;116(4):537-42; discussion 542-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.02103.x.
5
Staying home to give birth: why women in the United States choose home birth.在家分娩：美国女性选择在家分娩的原因。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2009 Mar-Apr;54(2):119-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jmwh.2008.09.006.
6
Outcome of planned home births compared to hospital births in Sweden between 1992 and 2004. A population-based register study.1992年至2004年瑞典计划在家分娩与医院分娩的结局。一项基于人群的登记研究。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2008;87(7):751-9. doi: 10.1080/00016340802199903.
7
Outcomes of planned home births with certified professional midwives: large prospective study in North America.由认证专业助产士进行的计划在家分娩的结局：北美大型前瞻性研究
BMJ. 2005 Jun 18;330(7505):1416. doi: 10.1136/bmj.330.7505.1416.
8
Outcomes of planned home births versus planned hospital births after regulation of midwifery in British Columbia.不列颠哥伦比亚省助产士管理后计划在家分娩与计划在医院分娩的结局
CMAJ. 2002 Feb 5;166(3):315-23.
9
Home versus hospital birth.在家分娩与在医院分娩。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000(2):CD000352. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000352.
10
Outcome of planned home and planned hospital births in low risk pregnancies: prospective study in midwifery practices in The Netherlands.低风险妊娠中计划在家分娩与计划在医院分娩的结局：荷兰助产实践的前瞻性研究
BMJ. 1996 Nov 23;313(7068):1309-13. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7068.1309.

The safety of home birth: is the evidence good enough?

作者信息

McLachlan Helen, Forster Della

机构信息

Mother and Child Health Research, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

CMAJ. 2009 Sep 15;181(6-7):359-60. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.091240. Epub 2009 Aug 31.

DOI:10.1503/cmaj.091240
PMID:19720686
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2742151/
Abstract
摘要