Munro Cindy L, Grap Mary Jo, Jones Deborah J, McClish Donna K, Sessler Curtis N
Adult Health Department, School of Nursing, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia 23298-0567, USA.
Am J Crit Care. 2009 Sep;18(5):428-37; quiz 438. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2009792.
Ventilator-associated pneumonia is associated with increased morbidity and mortality.
To examine the effects of mechanical (toothbrushing), pharmacological (topical oral chlorhexidine), and combination (toothbrushing plus chlorhexidine) oral care on the development of ventilator-associated pneumonia in critically ill patients receiving mechanical ventilation.
Critically ill adults in 3 intensive care units were enrolled within 24 hours of intubation in a randomized controlled clinical trial with a 2 x 2 factorial design. Patients with a clinical diagnosis of pneumonia at the time of intubation and edentulous patients were excluded. Patients (n = 547) were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 treatments: 0.12% solution chlorhexidine oral swab twice daily, toothbrushing thrice daily, both toothbrushing and chlorhexidine, or control (usual care). Ventilator-associated pneumonia was determined by using the Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score (CPIS).
The 4 groups did not differ significantly in clinical characteristics. At day 3 analysis, 249 patients remained in the study. Among patients without pneumonia at baseline, pneumonia developed in 24% (CPIS >or=6) by day 3 in those treated with chlorhexidine. When data on all patients were analyzed together, mixed models analysis indicated no effect of either chlorhexidine (P = .29) or toothbrushing (P = .95). However, chlorhexidine significantly reduced the incidence of pneumonia on day 3 (CPIS >or=6) among patients who had CPIS <6 at baseline (P = .006). Toothbrushing had no effect on CPIS and did not enhance the effect of chlorhexidine.
Chlorhexidine, but not toothbrushing, reduced early ventilator-associated pneumonia in patients without pneumonia at baseline.
呼吸机相关性肺炎与发病率和死亡率增加相关。
探讨机械性(刷牙)、药物性(局部应用口腔洗必泰)及联合(刷牙加洗必泰)口腔护理对接受机械通气的重症患者发生呼吸机相关性肺炎的影响。
在3个重症监护病房中,对重症成年患者在插管后24小时内纳入一项采用2×2析因设计的随机对照临床试验。排除插管时临床诊断为肺炎的患者和无牙患者。患者(n = 547)被随机分配至4种治疗方法中的1种:0.12%洗必泰溶液每日2次口腔擦拭、每日3次刷牙、刷牙加洗必泰或对照(常规护理)。采用临床肺部感染评分(CPIS)确定呼吸机相关性肺炎。
4组患者的临床特征无显著差异。在第3天分析时,249例患者仍在研究中。在基线时无肺炎的患者中,接受洗必泰治疗的患者在第3天时24%发生肺炎(CPIS≥6)。当对所有患者的数据进行综合分析时,混合模型分析表明洗必泰(P = 0.29)和刷牙(P = 0.95)均无效果。然而,洗必泰在基线时CPIS<6的患者中显著降低了第3天肺炎的发生率(CPIS≥6)(P = 0.006)。刷牙对CPIS无影响,也未增强洗必泰的效果。
洗必泰而非刷牙可降低基线时无肺炎患者早期呼吸机相关性肺炎的发生率。