Suppr超能文献

慢性危重症患者出院4个月后的综合结局

Composite outcomes of chronically critically ill patients 4 months after hospital discharge.

作者信息

Daly Barbara J, Douglas Sara L, Gordon Nahida H, Kelley Carol G, O'Toole E, Montenegro Hugo, Higgins Patricia

机构信息

School of Nursing, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio 44106-4904, USA.

出版信息

Am J Crit Care. 2009 Sep;18(5):456-64; quiz 465. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2009580.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Data on likely postdischarge outcomes are important for decision making about chronically critically ill patients. It seems reasonable to categorize outcomes into "better" or overall desirable states and "worse" or generally undesirable states. Survival, being at home, and being cognitively intact are commonly identified as important to quality of life and thus may be combined to describe composite outcome states.

OBJECTIVE

To categorize postdischarge outcome states of chronically critically ill patients and identify predictors of better and worse states.

METHODS

Reanalysis of data from a trial of a disease management program for chronically critically ill patients. Two composite outcomes were created: (1) the "better" outcome: no cognitive impairment at 2 months after discharge and alive and at home at 4 months (ie, met all 3 criteria), and (2) the "worse" outcome: cognitive impairment 2 months after discharge, or death after discharge, or not living at home 4 months after discharge (ie, met at least 1 of these criteria).

RESULTS

Of 218 patients not requiring ventilatory support at discharge, 111 (50.9%) had a better outcome. Of 159 patients who were cognitively intact at discharge, 111 (69.8%) had a better outcome. Of the 39 patients who required ventilatory support at discharge, only 1 (3%) achieved the better outcome. Of 98 patients who were cognitively impaired at discharge, only 29 (30%) had the better outcome.

CONCLUSION

Need for mechanical ventilatory support and persistent cognitive impairment at discharge were associated with worse outcomes 4 months after discharge.

摘要

背景

关于出院后可能出现的结果的数据对于慢性危重症患者的决策至关重要。将结果分为“较好”或总体理想状态以及“较差”或一般不理想状态似乎是合理的。生存、在家以及认知功能完好通常被认为对生活质量很重要,因此可以结合起来描述综合结果状态。

目的

对慢性危重症患者出院后的结果状态进行分类,并确定较好和较差状态的预测因素。

方法

对一项针对慢性危重症患者的疾病管理项目试验的数据进行重新分析。创建了两个综合结果:(1)“较好”结果:出院后2个月无认知障碍,出院后4个月存活且在家(即满足所有3项标准);(2)“较差”结果:出院后2个月出现认知障碍,或出院后死亡,或出院后4个月不在家(即满足这些标准中的至少1项)。

结果

在出院时不需要通气支持的218例患者中,111例(50.9%)有较好的结果。在出院时认知功能完好的159例患者中,111例(69.8%)有较好的结果。在出院时需要通气支持的39例患者中,只有1例(3%)取得了较好的结果。在出院时存在认知障碍的98例患者中,只有29例(30%)有较好的结果。

结论

出院时需要机械通气支持和持续存在认知障碍与出院后4个月的较差结果相关。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

3
Cognitive Deficits Following Intensive Care.重症监护后认知障碍。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2019 Sep 20;116(38):627-634. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2019.0627.
5
Chronic Critical Illness: Application of What We Know.慢性危重症:已知知识的应用。
Nutr Clin Pract. 2018 Feb;33(1):39-45. doi: 10.1002/ncp.10024. Epub 2018 Jan 11.
8
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation among mechanically ventilated patients.机械通气患者的心肺复苏
Intensive Care Med. 2014 Apr;40(4):556-63. doi: 10.1007/s00134-014-3247-2. Epub 2014 Feb 26.

本文引用的文献

6
Intensive care decision making in the seriously ill and elderly.重症患者及老年患者的重症监护决策
Crit Care Med. 2004 Mar;32(3):649-54. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000115636.29294.2f.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验