Nolen Susan Bobbitt
University of Washington.
Cogn Instr. 2007 May 1;25(2-3):219-270. doi: 10.1080/07370000701301174.
In a 3-year longitudinal, mixed-method study, 67 children in two schools were observed during literacy activities in Grades 1-3. Children and their teachers were interviewed each year about the children's motivation to read and write. Taking a grounded theory approach, content analysis of the child interview protocols identified the motivations that were salient to children at each grade level in each domain, looking for patterns by grade and school. Analysis of field notes, teacher interviews, and child interviews suggests that children's motivation for literacy is best understood in terms of development in specific contexts. Development in literacy skill and teachers' methods of instruction and raising motivation provided affordances and constraints for literate activity and its accompanying motivations. In particular, there was support for both the developmental hypotheses of Renninger and her colleagues (Hidi & Renninger, 2006) and of Pressick-Kilborne and Walker (2002). The positions of poor readers and the strategies they used were negotiated and developed in response to the social meanings of reading, writing, and relative literacy skill co-constructed by students and teachers in each classroom. The relationship of these findings to theories of motivation is discussed.
在一项为期3年的纵向混合方法研究中,对两所学校的67名儿童在一至三年级的读写活动进行了观察。每年都会就儿童的读写动机对儿童及其教师进行访谈。采用扎根理论方法,对儿童访谈记录进行内容分析,确定每个领域中每个年级对儿童来说突出的动机,并按年级和学校寻找模式。对实地记录、教师访谈和儿童访谈的分析表明,儿童的读写动机最好从特定背景下的发展角度来理解。读写技能的发展、教师的教学方法以及激发动机的方式,为读写活动及其伴随的动机提供了支持和限制。特别是,研究结果支持了雷宁格及其同事(希迪和雷宁格,2006年)以及普雷西克 - 基尔伯恩和沃克(2002年)的发展假设。阅读能力较差的学生的地位以及他们使用的策略,是根据每个课堂上学生和教师共同构建的阅读、写作及相对读写技能的社会意义来协商和发展的。本文还讨论了这些研究结果与动机理论的关系。