Brandrup F, Menné T, Agren M S, Strömberg H E, Holst R, Frisén M
Department of Dermatology, Odense University Hospital, Denmark.
Acta Derm Venereol. 1990;70(3):231-5.
Two occlusive dressings--one zinc oxide medicated (Mezinc) and one hydrocolloid (Duoderm)--were compared in a prospective, randomized trial over a period of 8 weeks to determine their healing ability and effect on pain for venous and arterial leg ulcers. All patients were patch-tested before the study and colophony allergy was an exclusion criterion. Of the 43 outpatients included, 31 completed the trial and 6 patients randomized to each treatment group were withdrawn. The initial ulcer areas decreased after 8 weeks of treatment with Mezinc by 64% and by 48% after treatment with Duoderm. Ulcer pain was relieved in 50% of the patients--with a similar analgesic effect for the two dressings. Mezinc treatment was discontinued in 2 cases due to sensitization to colophony (one ingredient of Mezinc) which indicated a risk of contact allergy to colophony due to Mezinc treatment. 1103 consecutive eczema patients were patch-tested on the back with Mezinc and colophony 20% in petrolatum simultaneously. It was found that 42 (4%) of the patients showed allergic skin reactions to colophony and 19 (2%) to Mezinc. Both dressings were well tolerated by leg ulcer patients and there appeared to be no major differences in the efficacy of the two occlusive dressings.
在一项为期8周的前瞻性随机试验中,对两种封闭性敷料——一种含药氧化锌敷料(Mezinc)和一种水胶体敷料(Duoderm)进行了比较,以确定它们对腿部静脉和动脉溃疡的愈合能力及疼痛的影响。所有患者在研究前均进行了斑贴试验,松香过敏是排除标准。纳入的43名门诊患者中,31名完成了试验,随机分配到各治疗组的6名患者退出。用Mezinc治疗8周后,初始溃疡面积减少了64%,用Duoderm治疗后减少了48%。50%的患者溃疡疼痛得到缓解,两种敷料的镇痛效果相似。2例患者因对松香(Mezinc的一种成分)致敏而停止使用Mezinc治疗,这表明Mezinc治疗存在因接触松香而发生过敏的风险。对1103例连续性湿疹患者的背部同时进行含20%松香凡士林制剂和Mezinc的斑贴试验。结果发现,42例(4%)患者对松香有皮肤过敏反应,19例(2%)对Mezinc有皮肤过敏反应。腿部溃疡患者对两种敷料的耐受性均良好,两种封闭性敷料的疗效似乎没有重大差异。