• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与猪舍相同的实验装置中,舍内粪便分离对生物空气质量的影响。

Impact of in-barn manure separation on biological air quality in an experimental setup identical to that in swine buildings.

作者信息

Lavoie J, Godbout S, Lemay S P, Belzile M

机构信息

Institut de Recherché Robert-Sauvé en Santé et en Sécurité du Travail (IRSST), Montreal, Québec, Canada.

出版信息

J Agric Saf Health. 2009 Jul;15(3):225-40. doi: 10.13031/2013.27407.

DOI:10.13031/2013.27407
PMID:19728546
Abstract

In-barn manure separation systems are becoming popular due to various environmental pressures on the swine industry. According to the literature, separation of feces and urine directly underneath the slats should have a positive impact on barn air quality. Removal and rapid separation of the two phases (solid/liquid) would reduce the dust and bioaerosol emissions, which would significantly improve the air quality in pig-housing facilities. From an occupational health and safety perspective, the maximum endotoxin and total bacteria concentrations to ensure workers' safety should not exceed 450 endotoxin units per cubic meter of air (EU m(-3)) and 10(4) colony-forming units per cubic meter of air (CFU m(-3)), respectively. In the current study, the effect on air quality of six in-barn manure handling systems was measured. A flat scraper system and four separation systems installed under the slats (a conveyor belt system, a conveyor net system, and a V-shaped scraper operated at two operation frequencies) were evaluated and compared to a conventional pull-plug system (control). The experiment took place in twelve independent and identical rooms housing four grower-finisher pigs each, and air samples were collected and analyzed for total dust, endotoxins, bacteria, and mold counts. The results obtained from this experimental setup show that the separation of feces and urine under the slats would concentrate at least 80% of the phosphorus in the solid phase. The total bacteria and endotoxin concentrations are lower than those found in commercial hog barns but remain higher than the recommended levels. Only the total dust concentrations are approximately 10% of their regulated value. This separation has no impact on dust and bioaerosol concentrations compared to the control.

摘要

由于养猪业面临的各种环境压力,舍内粪便分离系统正变得越来越流行。根据文献记载,在板条下方直接分离粪便和尿液应对畜舍空气质量产生积极影响。去除并快速分离这两个相(固体/液体)将减少灰尘和生物气溶胶排放,这将显著改善养猪设施内的空气质量。从职业健康与安全角度来看,为确保工人安全,空气中内毒素和总细菌的最大浓度分别不应超过每立方米空气450内毒素单位(EU m(-3))和每立方米空气10(4)菌落形成单位(CFU m(-3))。在本研究中,测量了六种舍内粪便处理系统对空气质量的影响。评估并比较了一个平刮板系统和安装在板条下方的四个分离系统(一个输送带系统、一个输送网系统以及以两种运行频率运行的V形刮板)与一个传统拔塞系统(对照)。实验在12个独立且相同的房间中进行,每个房间饲养4头生长育肥猪,采集空气样本并分析其中的总灰尘、内毒素、细菌和霉菌数量。从该实验设置获得的结果表明,在板条下方分离粪便和尿液会使至少80%的磷集中在固相。总细菌和内毒素浓度低于商业猪场中的浓度,但仍高于推荐水平。只有总灰尘浓度约为其规定值的10%。与对照相比,这种分离对灰尘和生物气溶胶浓度没有影响。

相似文献

1
Impact of in-barn manure separation on biological air quality in an experimental setup identical to that in swine buildings.与猪舍相同的实验装置中,舍内粪便分离对生物空气质量的影响。
J Agric Saf Health. 2009 Jul;15(3):225-40. doi: 10.13031/2013.27407.
2
Impact of production systems on swine confinement buildings bioaerosols.生产体系对猪舍生物气溶胶的影响。
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2010 Feb;7(2):94-102. doi: 10.1080/15459620903425642.
3
Size distribution of particulate and associated endotoxin and bacteria in traditional swine barn rooms and rooms sprinkled with oil.传统猪舍和喷油猪舍中颗粒物及相关内毒素和细菌的粒径分布。
J Agromedicine. 2011 Oct;16(4):271-9. doi: 10.1080/1059924X.2011.606418.
4
Influence of building maintenance, environmental factors, and seasons on airborne contaminants of swine confinement buildings.建筑维护、环境因素和季节对猪舍空气传播污染物的影响。
AIHAJ. 2000 Jan-Feb;61(1):56-63.
5
Organic dust exposures from work in dairy barns.奶牛场工作中有机粉尘暴露。
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1998 Jun;59(6):403-13. doi: 10.1080/15428119891010668.
6
Assessment of Korean farmer's exposure level to dust in pig buildings.韩国农民在猪舍中的粉尘暴露水平评估。
Ann Agric Environ Med. 2008;15(1):51-8.
7
Association of environmental air contaminants with disease and productivity in swine.猪的环境空气污染物与疾病及生产力的关联
Am J Vet Res. 1991 Oct;52(10):1723-30.
8
Bacterial and fungal flora of dust deposits in a pig building.猪舍内灰尘沉积物中的细菌和真菌菌群。
Occup Environ Med. 1996 Jul;53(7):484-7. doi: 10.1136/oem.53.7.484.
9
Swine confinement buildings: effects of airborne particles and settled dust on airway smooth muscles.猪舍:空气传播颗粒和沉降灰尘对气道平滑肌的影响。
Ann Agric Environ Med. 2009;16(2):233-8.
10
Volatile organic compounds at swine facilities: a critical review.猪场挥发性有机化合物:批判性回顾。
Chemosphere. 2012 Oct;89(7):769-88. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.04.061. Epub 2012 Jun 7.

引用本文的文献

1
The Use of Bioaerosol Sampling for Airborne Virus Surveillance in Swine Production Facilities: A Mini Review.生物气溶胶采样在猪生产设施空气传播病毒监测中的应用:一篇综述短文
Front Vet Sci. 2017 Jul 27;4:121. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2017.00121. eCollection 2017.