Institute of Clinical Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Medical College, Tainan 70421, Taiwan.
Inflammation. 2009 Dec;32(6):410-8. doi: 10.1007/s10753-009-9150-2.
Intrapleural fibrinolytic therapy (IFT) provides clinical benefit in the treatment of complicated pleural parapneumonic effusion (CPE). Whether IFT influences the proinflammatory cytokines production and fibrinlytic activity is currently unclear. Therefore, we collected pleural effusion samples from CPE patients with IFT (study group) and patients without IFT (control group). A membrane human inflammatory cytokines array kit was used to compare the difference of targeted cytokine production between these two groups. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) methods were used for quantitative analysis of targeted cytokines and fibrinolytic enzymes. The results showed there were no significant differences between the study (n = 16) and control (n = 14) groups in patients' demographic data. After fibrinolytic therapy, the patients in the study group had significant lower plasminogen activator inhibitor (PAI) level (732.36+/-254.09 ng/mL vs 1,509.36+/-1,340.11 ng/mL, p<0.05) and higher urokinase plasminogen activator (u-PA) level (75.56+/-41.70 ng/mL vs 6.87+/-5.07 ng/mL, p<0.05) than they did before treatment. Moreover, the tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinase-2 (TIMP-2) (1,560.03+/-403.49 pg/mL vs 3,686.45+/-1,263.83 pg/mL, p<0.05) and inflammatory chemokine, regulated on activation normal T-cell expressed and secreted/chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 5 (RANTES), (293.58+/-212.93 pg/mL vs 749.27+/-53.79 pg/mL, p<0.05), were also significantly lower in the study group after fibrinolytic therapy, but not in the control group. In conclusion, intrapleural fibrinolytic treatment with urokinase could enhance fibrinolytic activity and decrease TIMP-2 and RANTES production.
胸腔内纤维蛋白溶解疗法 (IFT) 在治疗复杂性胸腔脓性胸腔积液 (CPE) 中提供临床获益。目前尚不清楚 IFT 是否会影响前炎症细胞因子的产生和纤维蛋白溶解活性。因此,我们收集了接受 IFT 治疗的 CPE 患者(研究组)和未接受 IFT 治疗的患者(对照组)的胸腔积液样本。使用膜人炎症细胞因子阵列试剂盒比较两组之间靶向细胞因子产生的差异。酶联免疫吸附测定 (ELISA) 方法用于定量分析靶向细胞因子和纤维蛋白溶解酶。结果显示,研究组(n = 16)和对照组(n = 14)患者的人口统计学数据无显著差异。纤维蛋白溶解治疗后,研究组患者的纤溶酶原激活物抑制剂 (PAI) 水平显著降低(732.36+/-254.09 ng/mL 比 1509.36+/-1340.11 ng/mL,p<0.05),尿激酶型纤溶酶原激活物 (u-PA) 水平显著升高(75.56+/-41.70 ng/mL 比 6.87+/-5.07 ng/mL,p<0.05),治疗前。此外,组织金属蛋白酶抑制剂-2 (TIMP-2)(1560.03+/-403.49 pg/mL 比 3686.45+/-1263.83 pg/mL,p<0.05)和炎症趋化因子、调节激活正常 T 细胞表达和分泌/趋化因子 (C-C 基序) 配体 5 (RANTES)(293.58+/-212.93 pg/mL 比 749.27+/-53.79 pg/mL,p<0.05)在纤维蛋白溶解治疗后也显著降低,但对照组没有。总之,尿激酶胸腔内纤维蛋白溶解治疗可增强纤维蛋白溶解活性,降低 TIMP-2 和 RANTES 产生。