Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Psychol Med. 2010 May;40(5):749-59. doi: 10.1017/S0033291709991097. Epub 2009 Sep 7.
Cognitive deficits in schizophrenia are well established and are known to be present during the first episode of a psychotic disorder. In addition, consistent heterogeneity within these impairments remains unexplained. One potential source of variability may be the level of pre-morbid adjustment prior to the onset of first-episode psychosis (FEP).
Ninety-four FEP patients and 32 healthy controls were assessed at baseline on several neuropsychological tests comprising six cognitive domains (verbal memory, visual memory, working memory, processing speed, reasoning/problem-solving and attention) and an abbreviated version of the full IQ. A global neurocognitive domain was also computed. Pre-morbid adjustment patterns were divided into three distinct groups: stable-poor, stable-good and deteriorating course.
Based on a cut-off of 0.8 for effect size, the stable-poor pre-morbid adjustment group was significantly more impaired on most cognitive domains and full IQ compared to the deteriorating group, who were more severely impaired on all measures compared to the stable-good group. The type of cognitive deficit within each subgroup did not differ and the results indicate that a global neurocognition measure may reliably reflect the severity of cognitive impairment within each subgroup.
Pre-morbid adjustment patterns prior to onset of psychosis are associated with severity but not type of cognitive impairment. Patients in the stable-poor group are generally more impaired compared to the deteriorating group, who are, in turn, more impaired than the stable-good group.
精神分裂症患者的认知缺陷是明确的,并且已知存在于精神病首次发作期间。此外,这些损伤内的一致性异质性仍然无法解释。变异性的一个潜在来源可能是首次发作精神病(FEP)前的病前调整水平。
94 名 FEP 患者和 32 名健康对照者在基线时接受了几项神经心理学测试的评估,包括六个认知领域(言语记忆、视觉记忆、工作记忆、加工速度、推理/解决问题和注意力)和全智商的缩写版。还计算了一个综合神经认知领域。病前调整模式分为三组:稳定差、稳定好和恶化。
基于效应大小的 0.8 截止值,稳定差的病前调整组在大多数认知领域和全智商方面的损伤明显比恶化组更严重,而恶化组在所有指标上的损伤比稳定好组更严重。每个亚组内的认知缺陷类型没有差异,结果表明,综合神经认知测量可能可靠地反映每个亚组内认知损伤的严重程度。
精神病发作前的病前调整模式与认知损伤的严重程度而非类型有关。稳定差组的患者一般比恶化组的患者损伤更严重,而恶化组的患者又比稳定好组的患者损伤更严重。