• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

修订后的快速认知筛查测试的验证

Validation of the revised quick cognitive screening test.

作者信息

Mate-Kole C Charles, Conway James, Catayong Katherine, Bieu Rachel, Sackey Naa Amerley, Wood Rebecca, Fellows Robert

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Central Connecticut State University, New Britain, CT 06050, USA.

出版信息

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009 Sep;90(9):1469-77. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.02.007.

DOI:10.1016/j.apmr.2009.02.007
PMID:19735773
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To validate the revised version of the Quick Cognitive Screening Test (QCST).

DESIGN

Cross-sectional.

SETTING

Senior homes; hospital; college campus.

PARTICIPANTS

Participants (N=377; 114 men, 263 women) were recruited comprising healthy controls (n=201; 40 men, 161 women), subjects with dementia (n=93; 34 men, 59 women) including Alzheimer disease (n=73) and vascular dementia (n=20); subjects with psychiatric illness (n=35, 15 men, 20 women), specifically schizophrenia or bipolar disorder; and subjects with other neurologic conditions (n=48, 25 men, 23 women) such as traumatic brain injury (n=12) and cerebrovascular disease (n=31). Diagnoses were confirmed by physicians using appropriate criteria. Recruitment was done in the northeastern region.

INTERVENTIONS

Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

In an effort to examine the reliability and validity of the revised QCST, participants were administered the revised QCST with a number of standardized measures (ie, Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive, Mini-Mental State Examination, Tests of Oral Fluency, Trail-Making Test, and Functional Activities Questionnaire).

RESULTS

The results revealed that the revised QCST discriminated between healthy controls and the neuropsychiatric participants. Additionally, the revised QCST significantly correlated with other standardized measures, confirming the revised QCST's reliability and validity as a screening instrument for subjects with cognitive deficits.

CONCLUSIONS

The revised QCST provides the clinician with a short yet reliable screening instrument in detecting cognitive deficits in subjects with dementia and other neurologic conditions.

摘要

目的

验证快速认知筛查测试(QCST)修订版。

设计

横断面研究。

地点

养老院;医院;大学校园。

参与者

招募了参与者(N = 377;男性114名,女性263名),包括健康对照组(n = 201;男性40名,女性161名)、痴呆患者(n = 93;男性34名,女性59名),其中包括阿尔茨海默病(n = 73)和血管性痴呆(n = 20);精神疾病患者(n = 35,男性15名,女性20名),具体为精神分裂症或双相情感障碍;以及患有其他神经系统疾病的患者(n = 48,男性25名,女性23名),如创伤性脑损伤(n = 12)和脑血管疾病(n = 31)。诊断由医生根据适当标准确认。招募在东北地区进行。

干预措施

不适用。

主要观察指标

为检验修订版QCST的信度和效度,对参与者进行修订版QCST,并采用了一些标准化测量方法(即阿尔茨海默病评估量表 - 认知部分、简易精神状态检查表、口语流畅性测试、连线测验和功能活动问卷)。

结果

结果显示,修订版QCST能够区分健康对照组和神经精神疾病参与者。此外,修订版QCST与其他标准化测量方法显著相关,证实了修订版QCST作为认知缺陷受试者筛查工具的信度和效度。

结论

修订版QCST为临床医生提供了一种简短而可靠的筛查工具,用于检测痴呆和其他神经系统疾病患者的认知缺陷。

相似文献

1
Validation of the revised quick cognitive screening test.修订后的快速认知筛查测试的验证
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009 Sep;90(9):1469-77. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.02.007.
2
Screening of mild cognitive impairment in Chinese older adults--a multistage validation of the Chinese abbreviated mild cognitive impairment test.中国老年人轻度认知障碍的筛查——中文版简易轻度认知障碍测试的多阶段验证
Neuroepidemiology. 2008;30(1):6-12. doi: 10.1159/000113300. Epub 2008 Jan 17.
3
Japanese version of the Frontal Assessment Battery for dementia.用于痴呆症的日本版额叶评估量表。
Psychiatry Res. 2007 Sep 30;153(1):69-75. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2006.04.004. Epub 2007 Jun 27.
4
The development and validation of a carer questionnaire to assess cognitive function in neuropsychiatric patients.一份用于评估神经精神疾病患者认知功能的照料者调查问卷的开发与验证
J Psychosom Res. 2007 Jul;63(1):93-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2007.02.004.
5
Validity and reliability of the Behavioural Assessment Tool for Cognition and Higher Function (BATCH) in neuropsychiatric patients.神经精神疾病患者认知与高级功能行为评估工具(BATCH)的效度和信度
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2007 Aug;41(8):697-704. doi: 10.1080/00048670701449203.
6
Validation of the Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status (TICS) in Japanese.日本版认知状态电话访谈(TICS)的验证
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2007 Jul;22(7):695-700. doi: 10.1002/gps.1812.
7
Measuring impairments in memory and executive function in older people using the Revised Cambridge Cognitive Examination.使用修订版剑桥认知测验评估老年人的记忆和执行功能损伤情况。
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2009 Sep;17(9):793-801. doi: 10.1097/JGP.0b013e3181b047c8.
8
[The "Neuropsychological Screening Test (NST)": initial validation and reliability studies].《“神经心理筛查测试(NST)”:初步验证与可靠性研究》
Zentralbl Neurochir. 1994;55(4):185-92.
9
The brief Kingston Standardized Cognitive Assessment--revised.简短的金斯敦标准化认知评估——修订版
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2005 Mar;20(3):227-31. doi: 10.1002/gps.1270.
10
Validation of a German version of the Confusion Assessment Method for delirium detection in a sample of acute geriatric patients with a high prevalence of dementia.在患有高痴呆患病率的急性老年患者样本中,对用于谵妄检测的德语版混乱评估方法进行验证。
Psychopathology. 2009;42(4):270-6. doi: 10.1159/000224151. Epub 2009 Jun 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Comorbid Cognitive Impairment in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD): Current Understanding, Risk Factors, Implications for Clinical Practice, and Suggested Interventions.慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)合并认知障碍:当前认识、危险因素、对临床实践的影响及建议干预措施。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Apr 8;59(4):732. doi: 10.3390/medicina59040732.
2
Brief cognitive screening instruments for early detection of Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review.用于早期发现阿尔茨海默病的简短认知筛查工具:系统评价。
Alzheimers Res Ther. 2019 Feb 28;11(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s13195-019-0474-3.
3
Cognitive screening in persons with chronic diseases in primary care: challenges and recommendations for practice.
基层医疗中慢性病患者的认知筛查:实践中的挑战与建议
Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2015 Sep;30(6):547-58. doi: 10.1177/1533317515577127.
4
Clustering mild cognitive impairment by mini-mental state examination.通过简易精神状态检查表对轻度认知障碍进行聚类分析。
Neurol Sci. 2014 Sep;35(9):1353-8. doi: 10.1007/s10072-014-1711-y. Epub 2014 Mar 19.