Suppr超能文献

替加环素与左氧氟沙星治疗社区获得性肺炎的疗效及安全性比较

Efficacy and safety of tigecycline versus levofloxacin for community-acquired pneumonia.

作者信息

Tanaseanu Cristina, Milutinovic Slobodan, Calistru Petre I, Strausz Janos, Zolubas Marius, Chernyak Valeriy, Dartois Nathalie, Castaing Nathalie, Gandjini Hassan, Cooper C Angel

机构信息

St Pantelimon Clinical Emergency Hospital, Bucharest, Romania.

出版信息

BMC Pulm Med. 2009 Sep 9;9:44. doi: 10.1186/1471-2466-9-44.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Tigecycline, an expanded broad-spectrum glycylcycline, exhibits in vitro activity against many common pathogens associated with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), as well as penetration into lung tissues that suggests effectiveness in hospitalized CAP patients. The aim of the present study was to compare the efficacy and safety of intravenous (IV) tigecycline with IV levofloxacin in hospitalized adults with CAP.

METHODS

In this prospective, double-blind, non-inferiority phase 3 trial, eligible patients with a clinical diagnosis of CAP supported by radiographic evidence were stratified by Fine Pneumonia Severity Index and randomized to tigecycline or levofloxacin for 7-14 days of therapy. Co-primary efficacy endpoints were clinical response in the clinically evaluable (CE) and clinical modified intent-to-treat (c-mITT) populations at test-of-cure (Day 10-21 post-therapy).

RESULTS

Of the 428 patients who received at least one dose of study drug, 79% had CAP of mild-moderate severity according to their Fine score. Clinical cure rates for the CE population were 88.9% for tigecycline and 85.3% for levofloxacin. Corresponding c-mITT population rates were 83.7% and 81.5%, respectively. Eradication rates for Streptococcus pneumoniae were 92% for tigecycline and 89% for levofloxacin. Nausea, vomiting, and diarrhoea were the most frequently reported adverse events. Rates of premature discontinuation of study drug or study withdrawal because of any adverse event were similar for both study drugs.

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that IV tigecycline is non-inferior to IV levofloxacin and is generally well-tolerated in the treatment of hospitalized adults with CAP.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT00081575.

摘要

背景

替加环素是一种新型广谱甘氨酰环素类抗菌药物,对许多与社区获得性肺炎(CAP)相关的常见病原体具有体外活性,并且能够渗透到肺组织中,提示其对住院CAP患者有效。本研究旨在比较静脉注射替加环素与左氧氟沙星治疗住院成人CAP的疗效和安全性。

方法

在这项前瞻性、双盲、非劣效性3期试验中,符合临床诊断标准且有影像学证据支持的CAP患者,根据肺炎严重程度指数进行分层,并随机接受替加环素或左氧氟沙星治疗7 - 14天。共同主要疗效终点为治疗结束时(治疗后第10 - 21天)临床可评估(CE)人群和临床改良意向性治疗(c-mITT)人群的临床反应。

结果

428例接受至少一剂研究药物的患者中,79%根据其肺炎严重程度指数得分为轻度至中度CAP。CE人群中替加环素的临床治愈率为88.9%,左氧氟沙星为85.3%。相应的c-mITT人群治愈率分别为83.7%和81.5%。肺炎链球菌的根除率替加环素为92%,左氧氟沙星为89%。恶心、呕吐和腹泻是最常报告的不良事件。两种研究药物因任何不良事件导致的研究药物提前停药或研究退出率相似。

结论

这些结果表明,静脉注射替加环素不劣于静脉注射左氧氟沙星,并且在治疗住院成人CAP时通常耐受性良好。

试验注册号

NCT00081575。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc1a/2753558/438b10224785/1471-2466-9-44-1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验