Fernlöf Gunilla, Sjöström Britta M, Lindell Klas M, Wall Ulrika E
Patient Safety AstraZeneca R&D, Mölndal, Sweden.
Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2009 Dec;20(8):667-74. doi: 10.1097/MBC.0b013e32832ff5aa.
Several new oral anticoagulants are currently investigated in phase III programmes, mainly with inhibition of factor Xa or thrombin as their pharmacological target. Advantages are expected with these new drugs compared with vitamin K antagonists, but one potential drawback is the lack of specific antidotes. During the clinical studies with ximelagatran, an oral direct thrombin inhibitor withdrawn due to hepatic side effects, investigators were instructed to manage bleedings with routine measures. We have retrospectively tried to assess whether this was sufficient or whether there was a need for reversal strategies. The study population consisted of patients with major bleedings in three long-term studies (104 ximelagatran, 155 warfarin). All individual patient narratives were reviewed with respect to management of the bleeding. Complementary data were retrieved from the data-based case report forms. Approximately, two of three of the patients in both groups were subject to some kind of treatment. One-third (1/3) in both groups had transfusions documented and/or received specific medication. Vitamin K was given more often to warfarin patients. Two ximelagatran patients received prothrombin complex (four-factor concentrate), but one was a patient with a severe hepatopathy suspected to be drug-induced. Overall, the case descriptions did not reveal any apparent differences in the course of events between groups. We found no indications that the lack of an antidote posed a clinical problem in patients treated with ximelagatran as compared with warfarin. The relatively short half-life of melagatran, the active metabolite of ximelagatran, may have contributed to these results.
目前有几种新型口服抗凝剂正处于Ⅲ期临床试验阶段,其主要药理靶点为抑制因子Xa或凝血酶。与维生素K拮抗剂相比,这些新药有望具有诸多优势,但一个潜在的缺点是缺乏特效解毒剂。在对ximelagatran(一种因肝脏副作用而撤市的口服直接凝血酶抑制剂)进行临床研究期间,研究人员奉命采用常规措施处理出血情况。我们进行了回顾性研究,以评估这样做是否足够,或者是否需要采取逆转策略。研究对象包括三项长期研究中出现严重出血的患者(104例使用ximelagatran,155例使用华法林)。我们对所有患者的个体病历进行了回顾,以了解出血的处理情况。补充数据从基于数据库的病例报告表中获取。两组中大约三分之二的患者接受了某种治疗。两组中均有三分之一的患者有输血记录和/或接受了特定药物治疗。华法林组患者使用维生素K的情况更为常见。两名使用ximelagatran的患者接受了凝血酶原复合物(四因子浓缩物)治疗,但其中一名患者患有严重肝病,怀疑是药物所致。总体而言,病例描述并未显示两组在事件过程中有任何明显差异。我们没有发现迹象表明,与华法林相比,缺乏解毒剂给使用ximelagatran治疗的患者带来了临床问题。ximelagatran的活性代谢产物melagatran相对较短的半衰期可能促成了这些结果。