Suppr超能文献

富含二氧化碳、富含氧气的空气与正常空气治疗急性高原病的比较。

Comparison of carbon-dioxide-enriched, oxygen-enriched, and normal air in treatment of acute mountain sickness.

作者信息

Bärtsch P, Baumgartner R W, Waber U, Maggiorini M, Oelz O

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Inselspital, Berne, Switzerland.

出版信息

Lancet. 1990 Sep 29;336(8718):772-5. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(90)93240-p.

Abstract

Twenty mountaineers with acute mountain sickness (AMS) at an altitude of 4559 m were randomly allocated to treatment with oxygen-enriched (33% oxygen), carbon-dioxide-enriched (3% carbon dioxide), or normal compressed air. Treatment with oxygen significantly improved the arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2), relieved symptoms of AMS, and reduced cerebral blood flow as estimated by transcranial doppler ultrasound examination of the median cerebral artery. The only significant effect of carbon dioxide was increased ventilation resulting in a slight rise in PaO2. Thus, in contrast to previous uncontrolled trials, this study does not support the usefulness of carbon dioxide treatment in AMS.

摘要

20名在海拔4559米处患急性高原病(AMS)的登山者被随机分配接受富氧(33%氧气)、富二氧化碳(3%二氧化碳)或普通压缩空气治疗。吸氧治疗显著提高了动脉血氧分压(PaO2),缓解了急性高原病症状,并通过经颅多普勒超声检查大脑中动脉估计减少了脑血流量。二氧化碳的唯一显著作用是增加通气,导致PaO2略有升高。因此,与之前的非对照试验不同,本研究不支持二氧化碳治疗急性高原病的有效性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验