Benedetti Fabrizio, Dogue Sara
University of Turin Medical School, Neuroscience Department, Turin, Italy.
Plateau Rosa Labs, Breuil-Cervinia, Italy, Zermatt, Switzerland.
PLoS One. 2015 Nov 4;10(11):e0140967. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140967. eCollection 2015.
Clinical trials use placebos with the assumption that they are inert, thus all placebos are considered to be equal. Here we show that this assumption is wrong and that different placebo procedures are associated to different therapeutic rituals which, in turn, trigger different mechanisms and produce different therapeutic outcomes. We studied high altitude, or hypobaric hypoxia, headache, in which two different placebos were administered. The first was placebo oxygen inhaled through a mask, whereas the second was placebo aspirin swallowed with a pill. Both placebos were given after a conditioning procedure, whereby either real oxygen or real aspirin was administered for three consecutive sessions to reduce headache pain. We found that after real oxygen conditioning, placebo oxygen induced pain relief along with a reduction in ventilation, blood alkalosis and salivary prostaglandin (PG)E2, yet without any increase in blood oxygen saturation (SO2). By contrast, after real aspirin conditioning, placebo aspirin induced pain relief through the inhibition of all the products of cyclooxygenase, that is, PGD2, PGE2, PGF2, PGI2, thromboxane (TX)A2, without affecting ventilation and blood alkalosis. Therefore, two different placebos, associated to two different therapeutic rituals, used two different pathways to reduce headache pain. The analgesic effect following placebo oxygen was superior to placebo aspirin. These findings show that different placebos may use different mechanisms to reduce high altitude headache, depending on the therapeutic ritual and the route of administration. In clinical trials, placebos and outcome measures should be selected very carefully in order not to incur in wrong interpretations.
临床试验使用安慰剂时假定它们是无活性的,因此所有安慰剂都被认为是等效的。在此我们表明这一假定是错误的,不同的安慰剂程序与不同的治疗仪式相关联,而这些治疗仪式反过来会触发不同的机制并产生不同的治疗结果。我们研究了高原性或低压性缺氧性头痛,对其施用了两种不同的安慰剂。第一种是通过面罩吸入的安慰剂氧气,而第二种是随药丸吞服的安慰剂阿司匹林。两种安慰剂都是在预处理程序之后给予的,在预处理程序中,连续三个疗程施用真正的氧气或真正的阿司匹林以减轻头痛疼痛。我们发现,在真正的氧气预处理之后,安慰剂氧气可减轻疼痛,同时通气量、血液碱中毒和唾液前列腺素(PG)E2减少,但血氧饱和度(SO2)没有任何增加。相比之下,在真正的阿司匹林预处理之后,安慰剂阿司匹林通过抑制环氧化酶的所有产物,即PGD2、PGE2、PGF2、PGI2、血栓素(TX)A2来减轻疼痛,而不影响通气量和血液碱中毒。因此,与两种不同治疗仪式相关联的两种不同安慰剂采用了两种不同途径来减轻头痛疼痛。安慰剂氧气后的镇痛效果优于安慰剂阿司匹林。这些发现表明,不同的安慰剂可能根据治疗仪式和给药途径使用不同的机制来减轻高原性头痛。在临床试验中,应非常谨慎地选择安慰剂和结果测量指标,以免产生错误的解释。