UC Center for the Environmental Implications of Nanotechnology and Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2010 Apr;18(2):174-84. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2009.2032638. Epub 2009 Sep 22.
The main aim of our study was to investigate the possibility of applying machine learning techniques to the analysis of electromyographic patterns (EMG) collected from arthritic patients during gait. The EMG recordings were collected from the lower limbs of patients with arthritis and compared with those of healthy subjects (CO) with no musculoskeletal disorder. The study involved subjects suffering from two forms of arthritis, viz, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and hip osteoarthritis (OA). The analysis of the data was plagued by two problems which frequently render the analysis of this type of data extremely difficult. One was the small number of human subjects that could be included in the investigation based on the terms specified in the inclusion and exclusion criteria for the study. The other was the high intra- and inter-subject variability present in EMG data. We identified some of the muscles differently employed by the arthritic patients by using machine learning techniques to classify the two groups and then identified the muscles that were critical for the classification. For the classification we employed least-squares kernel (LSK) algorithms, neural network algorithms like the Kohonen self organizing map, learning vector quantification and the multilayer perceptron. Finally we also tested the more classical technique of linear discriminant analysis (LDA). The performance of the different algorithms was compared. The LSK algorithm showed the highest capacity for classification. Our study demonstrates that the newly developed LSK algorithm is adept for the treatment of biological data. The muscles that were most important for distinguishing the RA from the CO subjects were the soleus and biceps femoris. For separating the OA and CO subjects however, it was the gluteus medialis muscle. Our study demonstrates how classification with EMG data can be used in the clinical setting. While such procedures are unnecessary for the diagnosis of the type of arthritis present, an understanding of the muscles which are responsible for the classification can help to better identify targets for rehabilitative measures.
我们研究的主要目的是探讨将机器学习技术应用于关节炎患者步态中肌电图(EMG)模式分析的可能性。EMG 记录取自关节炎患者的下肢,并与无肌肉骨骼疾病的健康受试者(CO)进行比较。研究涉及两种关节炎患者,即类风湿关节炎(RA)和髋骨关节炎(OA)。数据分析受到两个问题的困扰,这两个问题经常使得此类数据的分析变得极其困难。一个问题是,根据研究的纳入和排除标准,能够纳入研究的人体受试者数量很少。另一个问题是 EMG 数据中存在很高的个体内和个体间可变性。我们使用机器学习技术对两组进行分类,从而确定了关节炎患者使用的一些不同的肌肉,并确定了对分类至关重要的肌肉。对于分类,我们采用了最小二乘核(LSK)算法、神经网络算法,如 Kohonen 自组织映射、学习向量量化和多层感知器。最后,我们还测试了更经典的线性判别分析(LDA)技术。比较了不同算法的性能。LSK 算法显示出最高的分类能力。我们的研究表明,新开发的 LSK 算法擅长处理生物数据。对于区分 RA 和 CO 受试者最重要的肌肉是比目鱼肌和股二头肌。但是,对于区分 OA 和 CO 受试者,最重要的肌肉是臀中肌。我们的研究展示了如何在临床环境中使用肌电图数据进行分类。虽然这些程序对于诊断存在的关节炎类型是不必要的,但了解负责分类的肌肉可以帮助更好地确定康复措施的目标。