• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性阑尾炎手术治疗与非手术治疗的比较。

Comparison of operative and non operative management of acute appendicitis.

作者信息

Turhan Ahmet Nuray, Kapan Selin, Kütükçü Ersen, Yiğitbaş Hakan, Hatipoğlu Sinan, Aygün Erşan

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Bakirköy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2009 Sep;15(5):459-62.

PMID:19779986
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In this prospective study, operative and nonoperative management of acute appendicitis were evaluated regarding their safety and cost effectiveness.

METHODS

Two hundred ninety patients presenting to our Emergency Department between March 2005 and March 2006 with acute appendicitis were included in this prospective study. Nonoperative medical therapy was performed in 107 patients (Group 1), and 183 patients were treated surgically (Group 2). Routine follow-up controls were done on the 10th day, at the 3rd and 6th months and at the first year after discharge in Group 1. Both groups were compared regarding age, gender, mean hospital stay, modified Alvarado score, morbidity, mortality, and cost effectiveness.

RESULTS

The male/female ratio of Groups 1 and 2 were 65/42 (mean age: 30.98+/-1.30) and 125/58 (mean age: 26.25+/-0.79), respectively. In Group 1, 19 patients were operated. Operation indications were resistance to therapy, patient's request, and operation in another hospital. Although the mean hospital stay of Group 1 was statistically significantly longer than Group 2, the mean cost of the therapy was $559 in Group 2 and $433 in Group 1. Morbidity rates were similar, with no mortality in either group.

CONCLUSION

With its high success rate and cost effectiveness, medical treatment seems to be a good alternative to the gold standard therapy of surgery in management of acute appendicitis.

摘要

背景

在这项前瞻性研究中,对急性阑尾炎的手术治疗和非手术治疗的安全性和成本效益进行了评估。

方法

本前瞻性研究纳入了2005年3月至2006年3月期间到我院急诊科就诊的290例急性阑尾炎患者。107例患者(第1组)接受非手术药物治疗,183例患者接受手术治疗(第2组)。第1组在出院后第10天、第3个月、第6个月和第1年进行常规随访。比较两组患者的年龄、性别、平均住院时间、改良Alvarado评分、发病率、死亡率和成本效益。

结果

第1组和第2组的男/女比例分别为65/42(平均年龄:30.98±1.30)和125/58(平均年龄:26.25±0.79)。第1组中有19例患者接受了手术。手术指征为治疗抵抗、患者要求以及在另一家医院进行手术。尽管第1组的平均住院时间在统计学上显著长于第2组,但第2组的平均治疗费用为559美元,第1组为433美元。两组的发病率相似,均无死亡病例。

结论

药物治疗成功率高且具有成本效益,似乎是急性阑尾炎治疗中替代手术金标准治疗的良好选择。

相似文献

1
Comparison of operative and non operative management of acute appendicitis.急性阑尾炎手术治疗与非手术治疗的比较。
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2009 Sep;15(5):459-62.
2
Perforated appendicitis: urgency or interval surgery?穿孔性阑尾炎:急诊手术还是择期手术?
Zentralbl Chir. 2007 Dec;132(6):539-41. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-981369.
3
Management of acute appendicitis: the impact of CT scanning on the bottom line.急性阑尾炎的治疗:CT 扫描对底线的影响。
J Am Coll Surg. 2010 May;210(5):699-705, 705-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.12.043.
4
Laparoscopic appendectomy--is it worth the cost? Trend analysis in the US from 2000 to 2005.腹腔镜阑尾切除术——是否物有所值?2000年至2005年美国的趋势分析。
J Am Coll Surg. 2009 Feb;208(2):179-85.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.10.026.
5
Is acute appendicitis a surgical emergency?急性阑尾炎是外科急症吗?
Am Surg. 2007 Jun;73(6):626-9; discussion 629-30.
6
Impact of a clinical pathway and standardization of treatment for acute appendicitis.临床路径及急性阑尾炎治疗标准化的影响
Surg Today. 2003;33(5):336-41. doi: 10.1007/s005950300077.
7
[Interval appendectomy as indicated rather than as routine therapy: fewer operations and shorter hospital stays].[间隔期阑尾切除术应按需进行而非作为常规治疗:手术更少,住院时间更短]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2007 Mar 31;151(13):759-63.
8
Treatment of perforated appendicitis in children: what is the cost?儿童穿孔性阑尾炎的治疗:费用是多少?
J Pediatr Surg. 2012 Jun;47(6):1177-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2012.03.024.
9
Can acute appendicitis be treated by antibiotics alone?急性阑尾炎能用抗生素单独治疗吗?
Am Surg. 2007 Nov;73(11):1161-5.
10
A simple and more cost-effective antibiotic regimen for perforated appendicitis.一种用于穿孔性阑尾炎的简单且更具成本效益的抗生素治疗方案。
J Pediatr Surg. 2006 May;41(5):1020-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2005.12.054.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost utility analysis of antibiotics compared with operative treatment in uncomplicated acute appendicitis.单纯性急性阑尾炎中抗生素与手术治疗的成本效用分析
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 29;15(1):14963. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-00111-5.
2
Controversies and Future Directions in Management of Acute Appendicitis: An Updated Comprehensive Review.急性阑尾炎管理中的争议与未来方向:最新综合综述
J Clin Med. 2024 May 22;13(11):3034. doi: 10.3390/jcm13113034.
3
Appendectomy versus antibiotic treatment for acute appendicitis.阑尾切除术与抗生素治疗急性阑尾炎的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Apr 29;4(4):CD015038. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015038.pub2.
4
Prevalence of appendicolith in children with acute appendicitis and its correlation with disease severity.急性阑尾炎患儿阑尾结石的患病率及其与疾病严重程度的相关性。
North Clin Istanb. 2023 Sep 14;10(5):631-635. doi: 10.14744/nci.2022.67984. eCollection 2023.
5
Comparison of the efficacy and safety of antibiotic treatment and appendectomy for acute uncomplicated appendicitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.抗生素治疗与阑尾切除术治疗急性单纯性阑尾炎的疗效和安全性比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Surg. 2023 Jul 24;23(1):208. doi: 10.1186/s12893-023-02108-1.
6
Management of appendicitis: appendicectomy, antibiotic therapy, or both?阑尾炎的治疗:阑尾切除术、抗生素治疗还是两者兼用?
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2023 Mar 27;85(4):897-901. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000000401. eCollection 2023 Apr.
7
Circulating fibrocyte percentage and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio are accurate biomarkers of uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis: a prospective cohort study.循环成纤维细胞百分比和中性粒细胞-淋巴细胞比值是单纯性和复杂性阑尾炎的准确生物标志物:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Int J Surg. 2023 Mar 1;109(3):343-351. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000234.
8
Development and Feasibility Testing of a Decision Aid for Acute Appendicitis.急性阑尾炎决策辅助工具的开发与可行性测试
J Surg Res. 2023 Sep;289:82-89. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2023.03.028. Epub 2023 Apr 20.
9
Randomized clinical trials comparing antibiotic therapy with appendicectomy for uncomplicated acute appendicitis: meta-analysis.随机临床试验比较抗生素治疗与阑尾切除术治疗单纯性急性阑尾炎:荟萃分析。
BJS Open. 2022 Jul 7;6(4). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrac100.
10
Antibiotic treatment for appendicitis in Norway and Sweden: a nationwide survey on treatment practices.挪威和瑞典的阑尾炎抗生素治疗:治疗实践的全国性调查。
BMC Surg. 2022 Jun 15;22(1):229. doi: 10.1186/s12893-022-01680-2.