Suppr超能文献

全酸蚀粘接剂对牙本质粘接效果的体外评价。

In vitro evaluation of bonding effectiveness to dentin of all-in-one adhesives.

机构信息

Department of Dental Materials and Fixed Prosthodontics, University of Siena, Policlinico Le Scotte, Viale Bracci, 53100 Siena, Italy.

出版信息

J Dent. 2010 Feb;38(2):106-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2009.09.008. Epub 2009 Sep 23.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The study was aimed at assessing the bonding potential of all-in-one adhesives to dentin.

METHODS

The microtensile bond strength of the all-in-one adhesives Bond Force (Tokuyama), AdheSE One (Ivoclar-Vivadent), and Xeno V (Dentsply) was measured in comparison with the etch-and-rinse system XP Bond (Dentsply). The ultrastructural characteristics of dentin-adhesive interface were observed under scanning electron microscope (SEM). Twenty human extracted third molars had their mid-coronal dentin exposed and ground with wet 600-grit SiC paper in order to create a standardized smear layer. Bonding procedures were performed according to the manufacturers' instructions and microtensile beams were obtained with the "non-trimming" technique. The bond strengths in MPa were statistically analyzed including pre-test failures as "zero" values (Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, Levene's test, One-Way ANOVA, Tukey's test p<0.05).

RESULTS

The following bond strengths were recorded in MPa (mean+/-standard deviation): AdheSE One 31.7+/-21.3; Xeno V 42.8+/-26.4; Bond Force 43.3+/-22.1; XP Bond 51.9+/-18.6. The statistical analysis demonstrated that the bond strengths achieved by Bond Force and Xeno V were similar to that of the etch-and-rinse adhesive, whereas the bond strength of AdheSE One was significantly lower. A distinct hybrid layer with resin tags was seen only in XP Bond specimens. All-in-one adhesives demonstrated a rather superficial interaction with the dentin substrate.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the strongest bond to dentin was established by the etch-and-rinse system, however the all-in-one adhesives containing organic solvents reached bond strength levels that were comparable from a statistical point of view.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估一体化粘结剂对牙本质的粘结潜力。

方法

本研究比较了一体化粘结剂 Bond Force(拓美)、AdheSE One(义获嘉伟瓦登特)和 Xeno V(登士柏)与酸蚀-冲洗粘结系统 XP Bond(登士柏)的微拉伸粘结强度。使用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)观察牙本质-粘结剂界面的超微结构特征。将 20 颗人离体第三磨牙的近中牙冠暴露并用湿 600 目 SiC 砂纸研磨,以形成标准化的玷污层。根据制造商的说明进行粘结程序,并使用“非切割”技术获得微拉伸梁。使用 Kolmogorov-Smirnov 检验、Levene 检验、One-Way ANOVA 和 Tukey 检验(p<0.05)对以预测试失败为“零”值的 MPa 粘结强度进行统计学分析。

结果

记录的 MPa(平均值+/-标准差)如下:AdheSE One 31.7+/-21.3;Xeno V 42.8+/-26.4;Bond Force 43.3+/-22.1;XP Bond 51.9+/-18.6。统计学分析表明,Bond Force 和 Xeno V 获得的粘结强度与酸蚀-冲洗粘结剂相似,而 AdheSE One 的粘结强度明显较低。仅在 XP Bond 标本中观察到具有树脂标签的明显混合层。一体化粘结剂与牙本质基质表现出相当浅的相互作用。

结论

尽管酸蚀-冲洗系统建立了最强的牙本质粘结,但含有有机溶剂的一体化粘结剂在统计学上达到了可比较的粘结强度水平。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验