Miskulin Dana C, Weiner Daniel E, Tighiouart Hocine, Ladik Vladimir, Servilla Karen, Zager Philip G, Martin Alice, Johnson H K, Meyer Klemens B
Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA 02111, USA.
Am J Kidney Dis. 2009 Dec;54(6):1081-8. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2009.07.010. Epub 2009 Sep 25.
Anemia management in hemodialysis patients poses significant challenges. The present study explored the hypothesis that computerized dosing of intravenous erythropoietin (EPO) would increase the percentage of hemoglobin (Hb) values within the target range and reduce staff time spent on anemia management.
Retrospective cohort.
SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: In-center hemodialysis patients who received EPO at Dialysis Clinic Inc dialysis units for at least 3 months between October 1, 2005, and April 30, 2006.
Computerized decision support (CDS) for EPO dosing is compared with manual physician-directed dosing.
Achieved monthly Hb values, quantity of EPO administered, and time spent by dialysis unit personnel.
Monthly Hb and quantity of EPO administered to 1,118 patients from 18 dialysis units treated using CDS and 7,823 patients from 125 dialysis units treated using manual dosing.
There was no difference in the likelihood of a monthly Hb level of 11-12 or 10-12 g/dL using CDS compared with manual dosing. The likelihood of an Hb level > 12 g/dL decreased and the likelihood of an Hb level < 10 g/dL increased using CDS. EPO use was 4% lower using CDS, although the difference was not statistically significant. CDS was associated with a nearly 50% decrease (P < 0.001) in the time spent by dialysis unit staff on anemia management.
Retrospective and nonrandomized.
The number of monthly Hb values in an 11- (and 10-) to 12-g/dL target range and EPO use did not differ with EPO dosing using CDS compared with manual dosing. Staff resources devoted to anemia management decreased significantly using CDS.
血液透析患者的贫血管理面临重大挑战。本研究探讨了以下假设:静脉注射促红细胞生成素(EPO)的计算机化给药方案将提高血红蛋白(Hb)值处于目标范围内的百分比,并减少工作人员在贫血管理上花费的时间。
回顾性队列研究。
2005年10月1日至2006年4月30日期间,在透析诊所公司透析单元接受EPO治疗至少3个月的中心血液透析患者。
将EPO给药的计算机化决策支持(CDS)与医生手动指导给药进行比较。
达到的每月Hb值、EPO给药量以及透析单元人员花费的时间。
对18个使用CDS治疗的透析单元的1118名患者和125个使用手动给药治疗的透析单元的7823名患者,测量其每月Hb值和EPO给药量。
与手动给药相比,使用CDS时每月Hb水平达到11 - 12或10 - 12 g/dL的可能性没有差异。使用CDS时,Hb水平> 12 g/dL的可能性降低,Hb水平< 10 g/dL的可能性增加。使用CDS时EPO用量降低了4%,尽管差异无统计学意义。CDS与透析单元工作人员在贫血管理上花费的时间减少近50%相关(P < 0.001)。
回顾性且非随机。
与手动给药相比,使用CDS进行EPO给药时,每月Hb值处于11(和10)至12 g/dL目标范围内的数量以及EPO用量没有差异。使用CDS时,用于贫血管理的人员资源显著减少。