Suppr超能文献

《临终与死亡质量问卷》(QODD):实证领域与理论视角。

The Quality of Dying and Death Questionnaire (QODD): empirical domains and theoretical perspectives.

机构信息

Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98104, USA.

出版信息

J Pain Symptom Manage. 2010 Jan;39(1):9-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2009.05.012. Epub 2009 Sep 25.

Abstract

We used exploratory factor analysis within the confirmatory analysis framework, and data provided by family members and friends of 205 decedents in Missoula, Montana, to construct a model of latent-variable domains underlying the Quality of Dying and Death questionnaire (QODD). We then used data from 182 surrogate respondents, who were survivors of Seattle decedents, to verify the latent-variable structure. Results from the two samples suggested that survivors' retrospective ratings of 13 specific aspects of decedents' end-of-life experience served as indicators of four correlated, but distinct, latent-variable domains: Symptom Control, Preparation, Connectedness, and Transcendence. A model testing a unidimensional domain structure exhibited unsatisfactory fit to the data, implying that a single global quality measure of dying and death may provide insufficient evidence for guiding clinical practice, evaluating interventions to improve quality of care or assessing the status or trajectory of individual patients. In anticipation of possible future research tying the quality of dying and death to theoretical constructs, we linked the inferred domains to concepts from identity theory and existential psychology. We conclude that research based on the current version of the QODD might benefit from the use of composite measures representing the four identified domains, but that future expansion and modification of the questionnaire are in order.

摘要

我们在验证性分析框架内采用探索性因子分析,并利用蒙大拿州米苏拉 205 名死者的家属和朋友提供的数据,构建了死亡质量问卷(QODD)潜在变量域模型。然后,我们使用来自西雅图死者的 182 名代理应答者的数据验证了潜在变量结构。两个样本的结果表明,幸存者对死者临终体验 13 个特定方面的回顾性评分是四个相关但不同的潜在变量域的指标:症状控制、准备、联系和超越。测试单维域结构的模型对数据的拟合度不佳,这意味着单一的全球死亡质量衡量标准可能不足以提供指导临床实践、评估改善护理质量的干预措施或评估个体患者的状况或轨迹的证据。为了预测未来可能将死亡质量与理论结构联系起来的研究,我们将推断出的域与身份理论和存在主义心理学的概念联系起来。我们得出的结论是,基于当前版本的 QODD 的研究可能受益于使用代表四个确定域的综合措施,但需要进一步扩展和修改问卷。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

2
Shared priorities for the end-of-life period.临终阶段的共同优先事项。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2009 Feb;37(2):175-88. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2008.02.012. Epub 2008 Aug 22.
3
The quality of dying and death.临终与死亡的质量。
Arch Intern Med. 2008 May 12;168(9):912-8. doi: 10.1001/archinte.168.9.912.
4
The "moment of death".死亡时刻。
Omega (Westport). 2007;55(3):219-36. doi: 10.2190/OM.55.3.d.
6
Measuring the quality of dying in long-term care.衡量长期护理中的临终质量。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007 Sep;55(9):1371-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01293.x.
7
Burden to others and the terminally ill.给他人和绝症患者带来的负担。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2007 Nov;34(5):463-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2006.12.012. Epub 2007 Jul 5.
8
The dying role.临终角色。
J Palliat Med. 2007 Feb;10(1):159-68. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2006.0134.
9
Dignity in the terminally ill: revisited.晚期患者的尊严:再探讨
J Palliat Med. 2006 Jun;9(3):666-72. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2006.9.666.
10
Measuring end-of-life care outcomes retrospectively.回顾性评估临终关怀结果。
J Palliat Med. 2005;8 Suppl 1:S42-9. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2005.8.s-42.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验