• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

磁惊厥治疗和电惊厥治疗动物模型中神经元和神经胶质细胞数量未改变。

Unaltered neuronal and glial counts in animal models of magnetic seizure therapy and electroconvulsive therapy.

机构信息

Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University, USA.

出版信息

Neuroscience. 2009 Dec 29;164(4):1557-64. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2009.09.051. Epub 2009 Sep 25.

DOI:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2009.09.051
PMID:19782728
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2784087/
Abstract

Anatomical evidence of brain damage from electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is lacking; but there are no modern stereological studies in primates documenting its safety. Magnetic seizure therapy (MST) is under development as a less invasive form of convulsive therapy, and there is only one prior report on its anatomical effects. We discerned no histological lesions in the brains of higher mammals subjected to electroconvulsive shock (ECS) or MST, under conditions that model closely those used in humans. We sought to extend these findings by determining whether these interventions affected the number of neurons or glia in the frontal cortex or hippocampus. Twenty-four animals received 6 weeks of ECS, MST, or anesthesia alone, 4 days per week. After perfusion fixation, numbers of neurons and glia in frontal cortex and hippocampus were determined by unbiased stereological methods. We found no effect of either intervention on volumes or total number or numerical density of neurons or glia in hippocampus, frontal cortex, or subregions of these structures. Induction of seizures in a rigorous model of human ECT and MST therapy does not cause a change in the number of neurons or glia in potentially vulnerable regions of brain. This study, while limited to young, healthy, adult subjects, provides further evidence that ECT and MST, when appropriately applied, do not cause structural damage to the brain.

摘要

脑损伤的解剖学证据缺乏;但在灵长类动物中,没有现代立体学研究证明其安全性。磁惊厥疗法(MST)作为一种侵入性较小的惊厥疗法正在开发中,仅有一份关于其解剖学影响的报告。在模拟人类使用条件非常接近的情况下,我们未发现接受电惊厥休克(ECS)或 MST 的高等哺乳动物的脑组织中有组织学损伤。我们试图通过确定这些干预措施是否影响前额皮质或海马体中的神经元或神经胶质细胞数量来扩展这些发现。24 只动物接受了 6 周的 ECS、MST 或单独麻醉,每周 4 天。灌注固定后,采用无偏立体学方法确定前额皮质和海马体中神经元和神经胶质细胞的数量。我们发现两种干预措施均未影响海马体、前额皮质或这些结构的亚区中神经元或神经胶质细胞的体积、总数或数值密度。在严格的人类 ECT 和 MST 治疗模型中诱导癫痫发作不会导致大脑潜在脆弱区域中神经元或神经胶质细胞数量的变化。这项研究虽然仅限于年轻、健康的成年受试者,但进一步证明了 ECT 和 MST 在适当应用时不会对大脑造成结构损伤。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a16/2784087/96da2dcc64dc/nihms149589f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a16/2784087/c207dc1522ff/nihms149589f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a16/2784087/d2c80d12d600/nihms149589f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a16/2784087/96da2dcc64dc/nihms149589f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a16/2784087/c207dc1522ff/nihms149589f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a16/2784087/d2c80d12d600/nihms149589f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a16/2784087/96da2dcc64dc/nihms149589f3.jpg

相似文献

1
Unaltered neuronal and glial counts in animal models of magnetic seizure therapy and electroconvulsive therapy.磁惊厥治疗和电惊厥治疗动物模型中神经元和神经胶质细胞数量未改变。
Neuroscience. 2009 Dec 29;164(4):1557-64. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2009.09.051. Epub 2009 Sep 25.
2
Differential heart rate response to magnetic seizure therapy (MST) relative to electroconvulsive therapy: a nonhuman primate model.相对于电休克治疗,磁休克治疗(MST)的心率差异反应:一种非人灵长类动物模型。
Neuroimage. 2009 Sep;47(3):1086-91. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.05.070. Epub 2009 Jun 2.
3
Differences in Seizure Expression Between Magnetic Seizure Therapy and Electroconvulsive Shock.磁休克治疗与电休克治疗在癫痫发作表现上的差异
J ECT. 2018 Jun;34(2):95-103. doi: 10.1097/YCT.0000000000000470.
4
Differential neurophysiological effects of magnetic seizure therapy (MST) and electroconvulsive shock (ECS) in non-human primates.磁休克疗法(MST)和电惊厥休克(ECS)对非人灵长类动物的不同神经生理效应。
Clin EEG Neurosci. 2008 Jul;39(3):144-9. doi: 10.1177/155005940803900309.
5
Absence of histological lesions in primate models of ECT and magnetic seizure therapy.在电休克治疗(ECT)和磁惊厥治疗的灵长类动物模型中无组织学损伤。
Am J Psychiatry. 2004 Mar;161(3):576-8. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.161.3.576.
6
Neurophysiological characterization of high-dose magnetic seizure therapy: comparisons with electroconvulsive shock and cognitive outcomes.高剂量磁休克治疗的神经生理学特征:与电休克治疗及认知结果的比较
J ECT. 2009 Sep;25(3):157-64. doi: 10.1097/YCT.0b013e31818dd40a.
7
Individualized Low-Amplitude Seizure Therapy: Minimizing Current for Electroconvulsive Therapy and Magnetic Seizure Therapy.个体化低振幅癫痫治疗:降低电休克治疗和磁休克治疗的电流强度
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2015 Aug;40(9):2076-84. doi: 10.1038/npp.2015.122. Epub 2015 Apr 28.
8
Minimum Electric Field Exposure for Seizure Induction with Electroconvulsive Therapy and Magnetic Seizure Therapy.电休克治疗和磁休克治疗诱发癫痫发作的最小电场暴露量。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2017 May;42(6):1192-1200. doi: 10.1038/npp.2016.276. Epub 2016 Dec 9.
9
Confirmatory Efficacy and Safety Trial of Magnetic Seizure Therapy for Depression (CREST-MST): study protocol for a randomized non-inferiority trial of magnetic seizure therapy versus electroconvulsive therapy.磁惊厥治疗抑郁症的确证疗效和安全性试验(CREST-MST):磁惊厥治疗与电惊厥治疗比较的随机非劣效性试验研究方案。
Trials. 2021 Nov 8;22(1):786. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05730-7.
10
Randomized controlled trial of the cognitive side-effects of magnetic seizure therapy (MST) and electroconvulsive shock (ECS).磁休克疗法(MST)与电休克疗法(ECS)认知副作用的随机对照试验。
Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2006 Feb;9(1):1-11. doi: 10.1017/S146114570500578X. Epub 2005 Jul 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Magnetic seizure therapy for people with schizophrenia.磁惊厥治疗精神分裂症。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jun 5;6(6):CD012697. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012697.pub2.
2
Magnetic Seizure Therapy Compared to Electroconvulsive Therapy for Schizophrenia: A Randomized Controlled Trial.磁休克治疗与电休克治疗用于精神分裂症的比较:一项随机对照试验
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Nov 25;12:770647. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.770647. eCollection 2021.
3
Comparative efficacy and cognitive function of magnetic seizure therapy vs. electroconvulsive therapy for major depressive disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis.比较磁惊厥疗法与电惊厥疗法治疗重性抑郁障碍的疗效和认知功能:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Transl Psychiatry. 2021 Aug 21;11(1):437. doi: 10.1038/s41398-021-01560-y.
4
Magnetic seizure therapy for treatment-resistant depression.磁惊厥疗法治疗难治性抑郁症。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jun 16;6(6):CD013528. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013528.pub2.
5
Safety and recommendations for TMS use in healthy subjects and patient populations, with updates on training, ethical and regulatory issues: Expert Guidelines.TMS 在健康受试者和患者人群中的使用安全性和建议,以及培训、伦理和监管问题的最新信息:专家指南。
Clin Neurophysiol. 2021 Jan;132(1):269-306. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2020.10.003. Epub 2020 Oct 24.
6
25 Hz Magnetic Seizure Therapy Is Feasible but Not Optimal for Chinese Patients With Schizophrenia: A Case Series.25赫兹磁休克治疗对中国精神分裂症患者可行但非最佳:病例系列研究
Front Psychiatry. 2018 May 29;9:224. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00224. eCollection 2018.
7
Electroconvulsive shock attenuated microgliosis and astrogliosis in the hippocampus and ameliorated schizophrenia-like behavior of Gunn rat.电休克减轻了冈恩大鼠海马中的小胶质细胞增生和星形胶质细胞增生,并改善了其类似精神分裂症的行为。
J Neuroinflammation. 2016 Sep 2;13(1):230. doi: 10.1186/s12974-016-0688-2.
8
Electroconvulsive therapy and structural neuroplasticity in neocortical, limbic and paralimbic cortex.电休克治疗与新皮质、边缘系统及边缘旁皮质的结构神经可塑性
Transl Psychiatry. 2016 Jun 7;6(6):e832. doi: 10.1038/tp.2016.102.
9
How Does Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Influence Glial Cells in the Central Nervous System?经颅磁刺激如何影响中枢神经系统中的胶质细胞?
Front Neural Circuits. 2016 Apr 5;10:26. doi: 10.3389/fncir.2016.00026. eCollection 2016.
10
Magnetic Seizure Therapy for Unipolar and Bipolar Depression: A Systematic Review.磁休克治疗单相和双相抑郁症:一项系统评价。
Neural Plast. 2015;2015:521398. doi: 10.1155/2015/521398. Epub 2015 May 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Repeated electroconvulsive seizures increase the total number of synapses in adult male rat hippocampus.反复电惊厥发作会增加成年雄性大鼠海马体中的突触总数。
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2009 May;19(5):329-38. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2008.12.007. Epub 2009 Jan 26.
2
Magnetic seizure therapy of treatment-resistant depression in a patient with bipolar disorder.双相情感障碍患者难治性抑郁症的磁休克治疗
J ECT. 2009 Jun;25(2):137-40. doi: 10.1097/YCT.0b013e31817dc45a.
3
Quick recovery of orientation after magnetic seizure therapy for major depressive disorder.重度抑郁症经磁休克治疗后定向力的快速恢复
Br J Psychiatry. 2008 Aug;193(2):152-5. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.107.044362.
4
Differential effects of high-dose magnetic seizure therapy and electroconvulsive shock on cognitive function.高剂量磁休克疗法和电休克对认知功能的不同影响。
Biol Psychiatry. 2008 Jun 15;63(12):1163-70. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2007.11.024. Epub 2008 Feb 8.
5
New interneurons in the adult neocortex: small, sparse, but significant?成年新皮层中的新生中间神经元:数量少、分布稀疏,但意义重大?
Biol Psychiatry. 2008 Apr 1;63(7):650-5. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2007.09.023. Epub 2007 Dec 11.
6
Loss of synapses in the entorhinal-dentate gyrus pathway following repeated induction of electroshock seizures in the rat.大鼠反复接受电击惊厥诱导后内嗅-齿状回通路中突触的丧失
J Neurosci Res. 2008 Jan;86(1):71-83. doi: 10.1002/jnr.21474.
7
G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences.G*Power 3:一款适用于社会科学、行为科学和生物医学科学的灵活的统计功效分析程序。
Behav Res Methods. 2007 May;39(2):175-91. doi: 10.3758/bf03193146.
8
Neuropathologic examination after 91 ECT treatments in a 92-year-old woman with late-onset depression.一名92岁患有迟发性抑郁症的女性在接受91次电休克治疗后的神经病理学检查。
J ECT. 2007 Jun;23(2):96-8. doi: 10.1097/YCT.0b013e31804bb99d.
9
Neocortical and hippocampal neuron and glial cell numbers in the rhesus monkey.恒河猴新皮层和海马体中的神经元及神经胶质细胞数量
Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2007 Mar;290(3):330-40. doi: 10.1002/ar.20504.
10
Antidepressant-induced neurogenesis in the hippocampus of adult nonhuman primates.成年非人灵长类动物海马体中抗抑郁药诱导的神经发生
J Neurosci. 2007 May 2;27(18):4894-901. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0237-07.2007.