Suppr超能文献

气囊扩张治疗贲门失弛缓症的长期疗效。

Long-term outcome of pneumatic dilation in the treatment of achalasia.

机构信息

Center for Gastroenterological Research, K. U. Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

出版信息

Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010 Jan;8(1):30-5. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2009.09.020. Epub 2009 Sep 25.

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Achalasia is treated with pneumatic dilation or Heller myotomy, but studies suggest poor long-term outcomes. We analyzed long-term outcomes after initial pneumatic dilation and studied factors associated with failure.

METHODS

A total of 209 patients (111 men; mean age, 51.2 +/- 1.4 years) with achalasia who were treated with pneumatic dilation between 1992 and 2002 were followed. Outcomes were correlated with demographics, presenting symptoms, manometric features, and treatment variables by using chi(2) and Student t tests.

RESULTS

All patients were initially treated with consecutive esophageal dilations up to balloon diameters of 3.0 (26%), 3.5 (41%), or 4.0 cm (33%). After dilations, mean lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure had decreased from 31.3 +/- 1.3 to 14.0 +/- 0.7 mm Hg (P < .0001); dysphagia decreased from 96% to 26%; and 49% had gained an average of 4.6 +/- 0.5 kg (weight loss at presentation was 10.6 +/- 0.7 kg in 39%). During follow-up, 66% required no additional treatment, whereas 23% underwent repeat dilations after 79 +/- 8 months. Patients without recurrence were older (41.2 +/- 2.1 vs 56.6 +/- 1.6 years; P < .0001) and had lower post-treatment LES pressure (17.8 +/- 1.2 vs 12.9 +/- 0.6 mm Hg; P < .005). After 70-month follow-up, balloon dilation yielded good or excellent outcomes in 72% of patients. In nonresponders, rescue surgery yielded higher success rates than botulinum toxin therapy (84% vs 44%). Patient satisfaction ranged from good to excellent in 81% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Treating achalasia with initial dilation and then surgery for short-term failures yielded good long-term results in more than 70% and treatment satisfaction in more than 80% of patients. Management of dilation failures is more problematic.

摘要

背景与目的

贲门失弛缓症采用气囊扩张或 Heller 肌切开术治疗,但研究表明长期疗效不佳。我们分析了初次气囊扩张后的长期疗效,并研究了与失败相关的因素。

方法

共纳入 1992 年至 2002 年期间接受气囊扩张治疗的 209 例贲门失弛缓症患者(男性 111 例;平均年龄 51.2±1.4 岁),通过 χ2 和 t 检验分析人口统计学、临床表现、测压特征和治疗变量与结局的相关性。

结果

所有患者最初均接受连续食管扩张,球囊直径达 3.0 cm(26%)、3.5 cm(41%)或 4.0 cm(33%)。扩张后,下食管括约肌(LES)压力从 31.3±1.3 mmHg 降至 14.0±0.7 mmHg(P<0.0001);吞咽困难从 96%降至 26%;49%的患者体重平均增加 4.6±0.5 kg(39%的患者就诊时体重减轻 10.6±0.7 kg)。随访期间,66%的患者无需进一步治疗,23%的患者在 79±8 个月后再次接受扩张。无复发患者年龄更大(41.2±2.1 岁 vs 56.6±1.6 岁;P<0.0001),治疗后 LES 压力更低(17.8±1.2 mmHg vs 12.9±0.6 mmHg;P<0.005)。70 个月随访时,气囊扩张后 72%的患者获得良好或优秀的结局。在无应答者中,挽救性手术的成功率高于肉毒毒素治疗(84% vs 44%)。81%的患者对治疗满意度为良好至优秀。

结论

贲门失弛缓症患者采用初次扩张治疗,短期失败后行手术治疗,70%以上的患者获得长期良好的结果,80%以上的患者对治疗满意。扩张失败的处理更为棘手。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验