Institute of Crop Science, National Key Facility of Crop Gene Resource and Genetic Improvement, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, PR China.
BMC Mol Biol. 2009 Sep 28;10:93. doi: 10.1186/1471-2199-10-93.
Real-time quantitative reverse transcription PCR (RT-qPCR) data needs to be normalized for its proper interpretation. Housekeeping genes are routinely employed for this purpose, but their expression level cannot be assumed to remain constant under all possible experimental conditions. Thus, a systematic validation of reference genes is required to ensure proper normalization. For soybean, only a small number of validated reference genes are available to date.
A systematic comparison of 14 potential reference genes for soybean is presented. These included seven commonly used (ACT2, ACT11, TUB4, TUA5, CYP, UBQ10, EF1b) and seven new candidates (SKIP16, MTP, PEPKR1, HDC, TIP41, UKN1, UKN2). Expression stability was examined by RT-qPCR across 116 biological samples, representing tissues at various developmental stages, varied photoperiodic treatments, and a range of soybean cultivars. Expression of all 14 genes was variable to some extent, but that of SKIP16, UKN1 and UKN2 was overall the most stable. A combination of ACT11, UKN1 and UKN2 would be appropriate as a reference panel for normalizing gene expression data among different tissues, whereas the combination SKIP16, UKN1 and MTP was most suitable for developmental stages. ACT11, TUA5 and TIP41 were the most stably expressed when the photoperiod was altered, and TIP41, UKN1 and UKN2 when the light quality was changed. For six different cultivars in long day (LD) and short day (SD), their expression stability did not vary significantly with ACT11, UKN2 and TUB4 being the most stable genes. The relative gene expression level of GmFTL3, an ortholog of Arabidopsis FT (FLOWERING LOCUS T) was detected to validate the reference genes selected in this study.
None of the candidate reference genes was uniformly expressed across all experimental conditions, and the most suitable reference genes are conditional-, tissue-specific-, developmental-, and cultivar-dependent. Most of the new reference genes performed better than the conventional housekeeping genes. These results should guide the selection of reference genes for gene expression studies in soybean.
实时定量逆转录 PCR (RT-qPCR) 数据需要进行归一化处理,才能正确解释。通常使用管家基因进行此目的,但不能假定其表达水平在所有可能的实验条件下保持不变。因此,需要系统地验证参考基因以确保正确的归一化。对于大豆,迄今为止只有少数经过验证的参考基因可用。
本文提出了对大豆 14 种潜在参考基因的系统比较。这些基因包括 7 种常用的(ACT2、ACT11、TUB4、TUA5、CYP、UBQ10、EF1b)和 7 种新的候选基因(SKIP16、MTP、PEPKR1、HDC、TIP41、UKN1、UKN2)。通过 RT-qPCR 在 116 个生物学样本中检测了所有 14 个基因的表达稳定性,这些样本代表了不同发育阶段的组织、不同光周期处理和一系列大豆品种。所有 14 个基因的表达都在一定程度上存在差异,但 SKIP16、UKN1 和 UKN2 的表达总体上最稳定。ACT11、UKN1 和 UKN2 的组合适合作为不同组织间基因表达数据归一化的参考基因,而 SKIP16、UKN1 和 MTP 的组合最适合发育阶段。当光周期改变时,ACT11、TUA5 和 TIP41 的表达最稳定,当光质改变时,TIP41、UKN1 和 UKN2 的表达最稳定。在长日(LD)和短日(SD)下的六个不同品种中,ACT11、UKN2 和 TUB4 是最稳定的基因,它们的相对基因表达水平没有显著变化。检测到大豆 GmFTL3 的相对基因表达水平,该基因是拟南芥 FT(FLOWERING LOCUS T)的同源物,以验证本研究中选择的参考基因。
没有一个候选参考基因在所有实验条件下都均匀表达,最合适的参考基因是条件、组织特异性、发育和品种依赖性的。大多数新的参考基因的表现优于传统的管家基因。这些结果应指导大豆基因表达研究中参考基因的选择。